python使用isinstance比较boolean和int [英] python comparing boolean and int using isinstance
问题描述
有人可以解释为什么 isinstance()
在下列情况下返回True?在编写代码时我期望False。
Can someone give me an explanation why isinstance()
returns True in the following case? I expected False, when writing the code.
print isinstance(True, (float, int))
True
我的猜测是它的python的内部子类,零和一个浮点数或者int - 都评估当用作布尔值时,但不知道确切的原因。
My guess would be that its python's internal subclassing, as zero and one - wheter float or int - both evaluate when used as boolean, but don't know the exact reason.
解决这种情况的最pythonic方法是什么?我可以使用 type()
,但在大多数情况下,这被认为是pythonic。
What would be the most pythonic way to solve a such a situation? I could use type()
but in most cases this is considered less pythonic.
推荐答案
由于历史原因, bool
是 int
的子类,所以 True
是 int
的实例。 (最初,Python没有bool类型,返回真值的东西返回1或0. 当他们添加 bool
时,为了向后兼容,True和False必须尽可能为1和0的替换,因此是子类化。)
For historic reasons, bool
is a subclass of int
, so True
is an instance of int
. (Originally, Python had no bool type, and things that returned truth values returned 1 or 0. When they added bool
, True and False had to be drop-in replacements for 1 and 0 as much as possible for backward compatibility, hence the subclassing.)
解决这个问题的正确方法取决于你认为的问题。
The correct way to "solve" this depends on exactly what you consider the problem to be.
- 如果你想
True
停止成为int
,那么太糟糕了。这不会发生。 -
如果您想检测布尔值并以不同于其他整数的方式处理它们,您可以这样做:
- If you want
True
to stop being anint
, well, too bad. That's not going to happen. If you want to detect booleans and handle them differently from other ints, you can do that:
if isinstance(whatever, bool):
# special handling
elif isinstance(whatever, (float, int)):
# other handling
如果要检测特定类正好的对象float
或 int
,拒绝子类,你可以这样做:
If you want to detect objects whose specific class is exactly float
or int
, rejecting subclasses, you can do that:
if type(whatever) in (float, int):
# Do stuff.
这篇关于python使用isinstance比较boolean和int的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!