目标C：是否可用于ios？ [英] Objective C: is Posing available for ios?
问题描述
- 我正在尝试为一个ios项目实施冒充。
- 场景：
在运行时定义控制器类 - 我意识到poseAsClass或class_poseAs是不适用于ios
&也不赞成使用macOX。 - 将会感谢任何在ios中实施冒充的指示。谢谢
- I am trying to implement posing for one ios project.
- The scenario: Defining class of controller at run time
- I realise that poseAsClass or class_poseAs is not available for ios & also deprecated for macOX.
- will be grateful to any directions to implement posing in ios. Thanks
推荐答案
如果你想篡改整个姿势/混合方法真的很有用OS /私有SDK提供的类 - 但是你通常不应该这样做，并且在你自己的代码中将它用作标准方法并不是一个好主意。
The whole pose / swizzle approach is really useful if you want to tamper with the OS / private SDK supplied classes - but you generally shouldn't be doing that and it's not a good idea to use it as a standard approach in your own code.
场景：在运行时定义控制器类
The scenario: Defining class of controller at run time
通常使用抽象超类/来执行此操作interface / @protocol定义潜在控制器需要实现的接口，然后在运行时切换它们。
You would usually do this by using an abstract superclass / interface / @protocol to define the interface that your potential controllers need to implement and then switching them in and out at runtime.
在你的情况下，似乎你有一个控制器充当真正控制器的代理。你在技术上也不需要@protocol，因为 UITableViewController 实际上是你的抽象超类，但你的代理最好是 UITableViewController 并拥有该视图，并且您的其他控制器为 NSObject 子类并且只需符合 UITableView DataSource / Delegate 协议。
In your case it seems that you would have one controller which acts as a proxy for the true controller. You also don't technically need an @protocol because UITableViewController is effectively your abstract superclass, but it would be best for your proxy to be a UITableViewController and own the view and for your other controllers to be NSObject subclasses and simply conform to the UITableView DataSource/Delegate protocols.
这篇关于目标C：是否可用于ios？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
