是否允许调用[self release]来控制对象的生命周期? [英] Is calling [self release] allowed to control object lifetime?

查看:107
本文介绍了是否允许调用[self release]来控制对象的生命周期?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我想在Objective C中创建一个对象,但我没有对它进行引用。

I want to create an object in Objective C but I don't hold a reference to it.

是否可以通过调用[self release]让对象控制自己的生命周期?

Is it allowed to let the object control its own lifetime by calling [self release]?

以防万一你想知道为什么我需要这个:我想创建一个订阅某些通知的对象,但过了一段时间后不再需要该对象并且应该消失。

In case you're wondering why I need this: I want to create an object that subscribes to some notifications, but after a while the object is no longer needed and should go away.

那么,允许以下内容吗?

So, is the following allowed?

- (void) destroyMyself {
   [[NSNotificationCenter defaultCenter] removeObserver:self];

   [self release];
} 


推荐答案

规则很简单。如果您拥有对象,则应该只释放它。即,使用以new或alloc开头的方法或包含副本的方法获取对象。

The rules are simple. You should only release an object if you own it. i.e. the object was obtained with a method starting "new" or "alloc" or a method containing copy.

可可内存管理规则

因此,除非之前完成[自我保留],否则对象不得进行[自我释放]或[自动释放]。

An object must not therefore do [self release] or [self autorelease] unless it has previously done [self retain].

这篇关于是否允许调用[self release]来控制对象的生命周期?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆