Thrift，Protocol Buffers，JSON，EJB等的性能比较？ [英] Performance comparison of Thrift, Protocol Buffers, JSON, EJB, other?

问题描述

我们正在调查传输/协议解决方案，并且即将进行各种性能测试，所以我想如果他们已经这样做，我会向社区查询：

We're looking into transport/protocol solutions and were about to do various performance tests, so I thought I'd check with the community if they've already done this:

有没有人为简单的回显服务做过服务器性能测试，以及比较Linux上的EJB3，Thrift和Protocol Buffers的各种消息大小的序列化/反序列化？

Has anyone done server performance tests for simple echo services as well as serialization/deserialization for various messages sizes comparing EJB3, Thrift, and Protocol Buffers on Linux?

主要语言是Java，C / C ++，Python和PHP。

Primarily languages will be Java, C/C++, Python, and PHP.

更新：我对此仍然很感兴趣，如果有人做了任何进一步的基准测试，请让我知道。此外，非常有趣的基准显示压缩JSON执行类似/优于Thrift / Protocol Buffers ，所以我我也把JSON扔进这个问题。

Update: I'm still very interested in this, if anyone has done any further benchmarks please let me know. Also, very interesting benchmark showing compressed JSON performing similar / better than Thrift / Protocol Buffers, so I'm throwing JSON into this question as well.

推荐答案

thrift-protobuf-compare 项目维基。它包括许多其他序列化库。

Latest comparison available here at the thrift-protobuf-compare project wiki. It includes many other serialization libraries.

这篇关于Thrift，Protocol Buffers，JSON，EJB等的性能比较？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！