控制反转与控制之间的区别依赖注入 [英] Difference between Inversion of Control & Dependency Injection
问题描述
IoC和DI概念对我来说非常混乱，所以我阅读了很多观点和不同人的帖子，最后得出结论。因此我理解这些主题是...
IoC and DI concept were very much confusing for me so I read lots of views and post of different people and finally reach to the conclusion. So as I understand these topics are...
控制反转是java中用于制作松散耦合和更易于维护的应用程序的技术，并且依赖注入是一种实现这个概念（技术）的方法。
Inversion of control is a technique in java for making loosely coupled and more easily maintainable applications, and dependency injection is a one of the way to achieve this concept(technique).
控制容器的反转在运行时从java类注入依赖关系，以生成松散耦合的应用程序。
Inversion of control container inject dependency at run time from java classes to make loosely coupled application.
这是真的吗？如果我错了，请纠正我...
Is this true ? correct me if I am wrong...
推荐答案
IoC是一个通用术语，而不是让应用程序调用方法框架，框架调用应用程序提供的实现。
IoC is a generic term meaning rather than having the application call the methods in a framework, the framework calls implementations provided by the application.
DI是IoC的一种形式，其中实现通过构造函数/ setter / service查找传递到对象，该对象将依赖以便正确行事。
DI is a form of IoC, where implementations are passed into an object through constructors/setters/service look-ups, which the object will 'depend' on in order to behave correctly.
参考：控制反转与依赖注入
这篇关于控制反转与控制之间的区别依赖注入的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
