JavaFX和Silverlight的优点和缺点 [英] Pros and Cons of JavaFX and Silverlight

问题描述

我知道Flex，JavaFX和Silverlight的性能已经存在问题。我的问题有点宽泛：

I know there is already a question about the performance of Flex, JavaFX, and Silverlight. My question is a bit more broad:

我们正在评估JavaFX和Silverlight的优点，作为控制/配置我们后端服务的GUI技术（目前已编写）在Java）。服务和GUI通常在同一台机器上，但也必须支持远程管理（通过浏览器）。我们目前分成两个团队：一个.Net和一个Java，虽然Java开发人员也有一些.Net经验。

We are evaluating the merits of JavaFX and Silverlight to serve as the GUI technology that controls/configures our back-end service (currently written in Java). The service and GUI are usually on the same machine, but remote management (via browser) must also be supported. We are currently split into 2 teams: one .Net and one Java, although the Java developers also have some .Net experience.

正如我所看到的，专业人士和缺点目前如下：

As I see it, the pros & cons are currently the following:

• 优点：
  
  
  
  
  • 优秀的IDE集成
  
  
  • 良好的开发人员 - 设计师工作流程
  
  
  • 性能
  
  
  • 广泛的第三方支持（工具，控制等）
  
  
  • 来自微软的大量动力和动力
  
  
  • 非常良好的浏览器外集成
  
  
  • Pros:
    • Excellent IDE integration
    • Good developer-designer workflow
    • Performance
    • Extensive 3rd-party support (tools, controls, etc)
    • Lots of momentum and drive from Microsoft
    • Very good out-of-browser integration
    
    
    • 仅在Mac和Mac上支持Windows（Moonlight支持不符合标准）
    
    
    
    
    • 优点：$ b​​
      $ b
      
      
      • 广泛的平台支持
      
      
      
      
      • 仅支持拉丁字符集（目前）
      
      
      • 更少的设计师工具
      
      
      • 很少或没有浏览器外集成。更新：显然有浏览器支持。
      
      
      • 性能（至少在我在www.javafx.com上查看过的演示）
      
      
      • 成熟度
      
      
      • Only supports Latin character sets (at this time)
      • Fewer designer tools
      • Little or no out-of-browser integration. Update: apparently there is out-of-browser support.
      • Performance (at least on the demos I viewed at www.javafx.com)
      • Maturity

      如果我遗漏任何东西或误会某事，请告诉我还有什么我没有考虑过的。我们还查看了Adobe AIR，但已将其排除在外，因为我们所有的开发人员都已经拥有Java和/或.Net的经验。

      Please let me know if I'm missing anything or mistaken about something, and what else I haven't considered. We also looked at Adobe AIR, but ruled it out because all our developers already have experience in Java and/or .Net.

      请不要在这里开始任何火焰战争。这不是一个宗教问题，我真的想要一些实用的建议和事实。

      Please don't start any flame wars here. This is not a religious question, and I really would like some practical advice and facts.

      推荐答案

      几个想到 JavaFX 。

      
      
      • 仅支持拉丁字符集（此时）（false）JavaFx使用标准的Java字符串表示，并且渲染完全能够处理非拉丁字符。
      
      
      • 更少的设计器工具（true）但是看看最新的NetBeans（更多@ 链接文字）
      
      
      • 很少或根本没有 - 浏览器集成（错误）JavaFX在Web /桌面，移动和新平台上运行。
      
      
      • 每个版本的性能都在提高。
      
      
      • 成熟度与Silverlight相同，但基于已安装的JVM具有更好的市场份额。
      
      
      • Only supports Latin character sets (at this time) (false) JavaFx uses standard Java string representation and also rendering is fully capable to handle non Latin characters.
      • Fewer designer tools (true) but take a look at newest NetBeans (more @ link text)
      • Little or no out-of-browser integration (false) JavaFX runs in web/desktop, mobile and new platforms are planned.
      • Performance is improving with each release.
      • Maturity has same as Silverlight, but with better market share based on installed JVMs.

      您对 JavaFX 有点不对。

      这篇关于JavaFX和Silverlight的优点和缺点的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！