JSF面向WEB-INF外的配置文件？ [英] JSF faces config file outside WEB-INF?

问题描述

创建多个面配置文件时，在WEB-INF之外使用faces-config.xml是正确的吗？ JSF规范似乎对此并不十分清楚（第10.1.3节）

When creating multiple faces config files, it is correct to have the faces-config.xml outside of WEB-INF? The JSF spec does not seem to be very clear about this (Section 10.1.3)

如果是，那么应该如何在web.xml中声明这个faces-config.xml ？ IDE生成的路径（如Eclipse / JDev）通常使用类似的东西：

If yes, how should this faces-config.xml be declared in web.xml? the paths generated by IDE's (like Eclipse/JDev) generally use something like:

<context-param>
    <param-name>javax.faces.CONFIG_FILES</param-name>
    <param-value>/WEB-INF/faces-config1.xml</param-value>
</context-param>

现在，如果我的faces-config.xml在WEB-INF之外 - 声明是否正确param值如/WebContent/WEB-INF/faces-config2.xml？

Now, if my faces-config.xml is outside WEB-INF -- is it correct to declare the param-value as something like "/WebContent/WEB-INF/faces-config2.xml"?

推荐答案

这是可能的，但不推荐。你在WEB-INF下放置配置文件的原因是服务器知道不提供这些文件 - 你有代码，数据库配置和其他敏感的东西。

It is possible, but not recommended. The reason you put configuration files under WEB-INF is that the server knows not to serve these files - you have your code, database configuration and other sensitive stuff there.

你不能使用/WebContent/WEB-INF/faces-config2.xml - AFAIKWebContent是eclipse特有的。将配置文件名称设置为WAR内的绝对名称。这意味着它们将始终以/ WEB-INF /\".

You cannot use "/WebContent/WEB-INF/faces-config2.xml" - AFAIK "WebContent" is eclipse specific. have the config files names to be absolute inside the WAR. It means that they will always begin with "/WEB-INF/".

这篇关于JSF面向WEB-INF外的配置文件？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！