Java框架选择问题 [英] Java Framework Choice Question
问题描述
我们确实有许多Java可用的框架。 Struts，Swing，JSF 2.0，Spring等按优先级使用。实际上，我不知道它们有多少！
We do have many frameworks available in Java. Struts, Swing, JSF 2.0, Spring etc are used as per their priority. Actually, I don't know how many they are as well!
但是，由于我对Java更新，甚至学习它们的架构，我无法确定哪个框架可以与什么类型的项目一起使用！
But, as I am fresher to Java, even learning after their architecture, I cannot decide which framework can be used with what type of Projects !
另外，我对Spring + JSF这样的框架的混合使用感到困惑。它有什么好处？
Also, I am confused with mixed use of framework like Spring + JSF. What is the benefit to it ?
让我感到困惑的另一件事是关于市场上可用的UI组件。就像，我们有Primefaces，Ice-faces，MyFaces，Rich-faces。它们可能支持也可能不支持内置的AJAX。它们也可能包含一些错误。什么是Framework + UI组件的最佳选择，可以直接为任何项目提供最佳的解决方案？
Another thing making me confusing is about the UI components available in market. Like, we do have Primefaces, Ice-faces, MyFaces, Rich-faces. They may or may not have been supporting AJAX in-built. They may contains some bugs as well. What is best choice for Framework + UI component that can directly provide a best feet solution for any project ?
推荐答案
我们确实有许多Java可用的框架。 Struts，Swing，JSF 2.0，Spring等按优先级使用。实际上，我不知道它们有多少！
We do have many frameworks available in Java. Struts, Swing, JSF 2.0, Spring etc are used as per their priority. Actually, I don't know how many they are as well!
Swing 不是基于Web的框架。这是一个桌面UI框架。你可能会对Spring MVC感到困惑。
Swing is not a webbased framework. It's a desktop UI framework. You're probably confusing with Spring MVC.
所有这些框架都可分为两种：
All of those frameworks are dividable in two kinds:
- 基于请求的MVC框架（Struts，Spring MVC）。
- 基于组件的MVC框架（JSF，Wicket）。
基于组件的MVC框架被视为基于请求的MVC框架的进一步发展。如果您想要更多抽象（即基本上最终得到视图和模型），请选择基于组件的MVC框架。如果您想要更多地控制控制器部件，请选择基于请求的MVC框架。
A component based MVC framework is seen as a further evolution of request based MVC framework. Choose a component based MVC framework if you want more abstraction (i.e. you basically end up with a view and a model). Choose a request based MVC framework if you want more control over the controller part.
另请参阅：
- Struts2 or JSF
- Component based vs Request based Java frameworks
- Choosing a Java web framework now
但是，因为我对Java更新鲜，甚至在他们的架构之后学习，我无法确定哪个框架可以用于什么类型的项目！
But, as I am fresher to Java, even learning after their architecture, I cannot decide which framework can be used with what type of Projects !
作为个人意见，转到JSF 2.0。
As a personal opinion, go for JSF 2.0.
另见：
- Sun JSF 2.0 tutorial
- Coreservlets JSF 2.0 tutorial
- Simple JSF 2.0 CRUD example
另外，我对Spring + JSF等框架的混合使用感到困惑。它有什么好处？
Also, I am confused with mixed use of framework like Spring + JSF. What is the benefit to it ?
Spring更像是一个注入（控制反转）框架。有人可能会说，它是EJB的替代品。 Spring MVC 是一个基于请求的框架。
Spring is more an injection (inversion of control) framework. One may say, it's the alternative to EJB. Spring MVC is a request based framework.
参见：
- Wikipedia: Inversion of Control
- Spring vs others
让我感到困惑的另一件事是关于市场上可用的UI组件。就像，我们有Primefaces，Ice-faces，MyFaces，Rich-faces。它们可能支持也可能不支持内置的AJAX。它们也可能包含一些错误。什么是Framework + UI组件的最佳选择，可以直接为任何项目提供最佳的解决方案？
Another thing making me confusing is about the UI components available in market. Like, we do have Primefaces, Ice-faces, MyFaces, Rich-faces. They may or may not have been supporting AJAX in-built. They may contains some bugs as well. What is best choice for Framework + UI component that can directly provide a best feet solution for any project ?
MyFaces是另一个JSF 实现，对于残余，你只提到JSF组件库。这些是用于在JSF实现的顶部。选择哪一个取决于哪一个最适合您的功能要求（肤色，可吸收性，增强性等）。
MyFaces is another JSF implementation and for the remnant you only mention JSF component libraries. Those are meant to be used on top of a JSF implementation. Which one to choose depends on which one suits your functional requirements the best (skinnability, ajaxability, enhancability, etc).
作为个人意见， PrimeFaces 2.0 看起来最好。
As a personal opinion, PrimeFaces 2.0 looks the best.
参见：
- JSF实现和组件库之间的区别是什么
- JSP / Servlet / JSF之间有什么区别
- What's the difference between JSF implementations and component libraries
- What's the difference between JSP/Servlet/JSF
这篇关于Java框架选择问题的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
