工会主义者与分裂主义者 [英] unionists versus separatists

查看:136
本文介绍了工会主义者与分裂主义者的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

C程序员似乎分为两个阵营:


1.希望将C和C ++拉近距离的工会会员和

2.分离主义者想要远离C ++绘制C语言。


激进的分离主义者编写C ++编译器不接受的C代码。

激进的工会主义者坚持认为C最终会采用

C ++的所有语义。


C真的有一个与C ++分开的未来吗?

最终所有的C程序员都会放弃C for C ++?

或者C程序员的竞争最终会消亡吗?

解决方案

On 2004-01-27,E。Robert Tisdale< E. ************** @ jpl.nasa.gov>写道:

C程序员似乎分为两个阵营:

1.希望将C和C ++拉近距离的工会会员和
2.想要的分离主义者C远离C ++。

激进的分离主义者编写C ++编译器不接受的C代码。激进的工会主义者坚持认为C最终会采用所有的语义。 C ++。

C真的有一个与C ++分开的未来吗?
所有C程序员最终会放弃C for C ++吗?
或者C程序员的竞争最终会消亡吗? / blockquote>


如何用汇编语言重新构造查询?用C替代C和

用C代替C ++?


- James


电子。 Robert Tisdale写道:

C程序员似乎分为两个阵营:

1.希望将C和C ++拉近距离的工会会员> 2.希望将C画得远离C ++的分离主义者。


至少三个营地。你忘记了所有那些没有给出什么的人,因为C和C ++是不同的语言,因为C和C ++是单独的语言。

激进的分离主义编写C ++编译器赢得的C代码不接受。


别傻了。我编写COBOL编译器不接受的C代码。那个

让我成为COBOL和C的激进分裂主义者吗?当然不是。

激进的工会主义者坚持认为C最终会采用所有C ++的语义。


如果你想要C ++,你知道在哪里找到它。

C真的有一个与C ++分开的未来吗?


是的。

所有C程序员最终都会放弃C for C ++吗?


No.

或者C程序员的竞争最终会消亡吗?




不太可能。

-

Richard Heathfield: bi **** @ eton.powernet.co.uk

Usenet是一个奇怪的地方。 - Dennis M Ritchie,1999年7月29日。

C FAQ: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html

K& R答案,C书等:< a rel =nofollowhref =http://users.powernet.co.uk/etontarget =_ blank> http://users.powernet.co.uk/eton


电子。罗伯特·提斯代尔写道:

C程序员似乎分为两个阵营:

1.希望将C和C ++拉近距离的工会会员和
2.分离主义者谁想要远离C ++绘制C语言。

激进的分离主义者编写C ++编译器不会接受的C代码。
激进的工会主义者坚持认为C最终会采用所有的C ++的语义。

C真的有一个与C ++分开的未来吗?
所有C程序员最终会放弃C for C ++吗?
或者C程序员的竞争最终会消亡?




我在C语言中编程,虽然我讨厌暂时不得不用C ++编写
...我不是一个separist,我根本不喜欢C ++ ..我试着用b $ b来完善我的C代码作为C代码,而不是作为C ++代码...


PS对于OOP,我更喜欢Java;)(不要开始火焰战争)...


C programmers appear to be divided into two camps:

1. unionists who want to draw C and C++ closer together and
2. separatist who want draw C farther away from C++.

Radical separatist write C codes that C++ compilers won''t accept.
Radical unionists insist that C will eventually adopt
all of the semantics of C++.

Does C really have a future separate from C++?
Will all C programmers eventually abandon C for C++?
Or will the race of C programmers eventually die out?

解决方案

On 2004-01-27, E. Robert Tisdale <E.**************@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:

C programmers appear to be divided into two camps:

1. unionists who want to draw C and C++ closer together and
2. separatist who want draw C farther away from C++.

Radical separatist write C codes that C++ compilers won''t accept.
Radical unionists insist that C will eventually adopt
all of the semantics of C++.

Does C really have a future separate from C++?
Will all C programmers eventually abandon C for C++?
Or will the race of C programmers eventually die out?



How about rephrasing your query with "assembly language" in place of C, and
with C in place of C++?

-- James


E. Robert Tisdale wrote:

C programmers appear to be divided into two camps:

1. unionists who want to draw C and C++ closer together and
2. separatist who want draw C farther away from C++.
Three camps, at least. You forgot all about those who don''t give a damn what
C++ does, because C and C++ are separate languages.
Radical separatist write C codes that C++ compilers won''t accept.
Don''t be silly. I write C code that COBOL compilers won''t accept. Does that
make me a radical separatist with respect to COBOL and C? Of course not.
Radical unionists insist that C will eventually adopt
all of the semantics of C++.
If you want C++, you know where to find it.
Does C really have a future separate from C++?
Yes.
Will all C programmers eventually abandon C for C++?
No.
Or will the race of C programmers eventually die out?



Unlikely.
--
Richard Heathfield : bi****@eton.powernet.co.uk
"Usenet is a strange place." - Dennis M Ritchie, 29 July 1999.
C FAQ: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html
K&R answers, C books, etc: http://users.powernet.co.uk/eton


E. Robert Tisdale wrote:

C programmers appear to be divided into two camps:

1. unionists who want to draw C and C++ closer together and
2. separatist who want draw C farther away from C++.

Radical separatist write C codes that C++ compilers won''t accept.
Radical unionists insist that C will eventually adopt
all of the semantics of C++.

Does C really have a future separate from C++?
Will all C programmers eventually abandon C for C++?
Or will the race of C programmers eventually die out?



I program in C, though I hate for the time being anything that has to do
with C++... I am not a separist, I simply don'' t like C++.. I try to
perfect my C code as a C code, not as a C++ code...

PS For OOP, I like Java more ;) (don''t start a flame war plzzz)...


这篇关于工会主义者与分裂主义者的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆