还有人手工编码网站吗? [英] Anyone still hand-coding web sites?
问题描述
我可以追溯到网络的早期,当HTML被限制时
但非常可管理,并且始终保持手工编码
HTML让你好得多任何WYSIWYG编辑器控制和清理HTML标记。
但我创建和管理的所有网站都是小网站(<50页)。 />
我已经不再使用
方法中的新功能以及过去夫妇的规格
多年来。
我需要重新进入网页设计并且不得不追上很多的b $ b,因为我发现大部分的东西我知道并做了
可能被认为是过时的这很乏味。
我只需要一些时间来熟悉
更新的规格,但我不能决定是否应该坚持下去手工编码
网页,或转移到某种预打包管理
系统。
我听说Dreamweaver是非常受欢迎,但从未使用过它。
人们是否仍在手工编写网页设计和网页,或者应该使用b / b
我采用更新,更有效的方法吗? br />
I date back to the early days of the web when HTML was limited
but very managable, and have always maintained that hand-coding
HTML gives you far better control and cleaner HTML markup than
any WYSIWYG editor.
But all the sites I created and manage are small sites (<50 pages).
And I''ve been out of the loop in terms of what''s new in
methodology and with the specifications for the past couple
of years.
I need to get back into web design and am having to catch up
with a lot, as I find that most of the stuff I knew and did
is probably considered "archaic" and tedious.
It will just take me some time to familiarize myself with the
newer specs, but I can''t decide if I should stay with hand-coding
web pages, or move to some kind of pre-packaged management
system.
I hear Dreamweaver is very popular, but have never used it.
Are people still hand-coding web design and web pages, or should
I move to a newer, more efficient method?
推荐答案
rf ***** @ go.com (RFox)写道:
我听说Dreamweaver非常受欢迎,但从未使用过它。
人们是否还在手工编写网页设计和网页,或者应该>我转向更新,更有效的方法?
I hear Dreamweaver is very popular, but have never used it.
Are people still hand-coding web design and web pages, or should
I move to a newer, more efficient method?
请参阅google档案中关于此主题的* multiple * threads。
但是,总的来说,人们仍在手工编码。没有''更新,
更有效的方法'',但使用预处理器或服务器端
脚本可以提高效率。
-
Chris
See *multiple* threads in the google archives on this subject.
However, in summary, people are still hand-coding. There''s no ''newer,
more efficient method'', but the use of preprocessors or server-side
scripting can make it a lot more efficient.
--
Chris
RFox写道:
RFox wrote:
我可以追溯到网络的早期,当HTML有限时,但是非常容易管理,并且始终坚持手工编码
HTML为您提供了比
任何WYSIWYG编辑器。
当然可以。当你用图片呈现时,AI并不足以理解你_ $ _
。
我听说Dreamweaver非常受欢迎,但从未使用它。
< shiver>
它的HTML几乎是可以容忍的(假如你不要让它使用任何东西
'已被弃用),它的CSS很糟糕,而且它的JavaScript更糟糕。
人们仍在手工编写网页设计和网页,或者应该
我转向更新,更有效的方法?
I date back to the early days of the web when HTML was limited
but very managable, and have always maintained that hand-coding
HTML gives you far better control and cleaner HTML markup than
any WYSIWYG editor.
Of course it does. AI isn''t good enough to understand what you _mean_ when
you present with a picture.
I hear Dreamweaver is very popular, but have never used it.
<shiver>
It''s HTML is just about tolerable (providing you don''t let it use anything
that''s deprecated), its CSS is awful, and its JavaScript is worse.
Are people still hand-coding web design and web pages, or should
I move to a newer, more efficient method?
对于大型网站,我建议选择某种形式的模板工具(我喜欢
wmake),然后手工编写HTML,或使用Textile
等内容。
-
David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk/
RFox写道:
RFox wrote:
我的历史可以追溯到网络的早期,当HTML有限时,但是非常可管理,并且一直保持着手工编码HTML可以让你更好地控制d比任何WYSIWYG编辑器更清晰的HTML标记。
I date back to the early days of the web when HTML was limited
but very managable, and have always maintained that hand-coding
HTML gives you far better control and cleaner HTML markup than
any WYSIWYG editor.
它仍然是那样的。特别是如果你想管理10,000个
页面,你需要手动编码你输出的每一行。理想情况下,使用一些服务器端脚本完成所有的工作。而且非常简单的HTML。也许
内容在数据库中。但是没有WYSIWYG工具可以很好地完成这项工作(创建CSS,数据库结构,严格的HTML,CMS,
表格等)。 >
一旦触及WYSIWYG,单个页面可能会花费更少的时间,但
基础方法很糟糕。有些程序可能擅长处理
模板,但您也可以自己编写脚本。或者使用CSS。
-
Google Blogoscoped
http://blog.outer-court.com
这篇关于还有人手工编码网站吗?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!