微软对C＃失去兴趣？ [英] Microsoft Losing Interest in C#?
问题描述
我不知道你是否注意到了，但似乎微软正在失去对C＃的兴趣，并将其精力投入到Visual Basic.NET中。
例如，自2004年7月1日起按语言在线聊天：
VB.NET 47
C＃6
C ++ 8
J＃0
ADO与VB.NET 6
ADO与C＃0
ADO与C ++ 0
ADO与J＃0
Windows窗体与VB.NET 2
Windows窗体与C＃ 0
带有C ++的Windows窗体0
带有J＃0的Windows窗体
如果你看看微软已经制定的路线图Visual Studio 2005和
各种语言，看起来几乎所有RAD的改进都是针对
VB.NET。我唯一看到C＃的是一些语言增强功能，
但对于RAD来说真的没什么。是的，C＃程序员想要粒度，但我们
除非项目外出，否则不会得到报酬！你必须把它拿出
门。微软何时才能醒悟过来？
我不明白为什么微软不会把同样的精力放到
以C开头的语言因为他们做B......然后他们想知道为什么人们在其他平台上篡改Java，PHP甚至C ++的原因。
也许现在是C＃人说话的时候了。
Michael
I don''t know if you have noticed, but it seems like Microsoft is losing
interest in C#, and putting their energy into Visual Basic.NET instead.
For instance, online chats by language since July 1, 2004:
VB.NET 47
C# 6
C++ 8
J# 0
ADO with VB.NET 6
ADO with C# 0
ADO with C++ 0
ADO with J# 0
Windows Forms with VB.NET 2
Windows Forms with C# 0
Windows Forms with C++ 0
Windows Forms with J# 0
If you look at the roadmap Microsoft has laid out for Visual Studio 2005 and
the various languages, it appears almost all of the RAD improvements are for
VB.NET. The only thing I see coming for C# are a few language enhancements,
but really nothing for RAD. Yes, C# programmers want granularity, but we
don''t get paid unless the projects go out, too! You have to get it out the
door. When is Microsoft going to wake up to this?
I don''t understand why Microsoft doesn''t put the same kind of energy into
the languages that start with a "C" as they do a "B"...and then they wonder
why people defect to Java, PHP, or even C++ on other platforms.
Maybe it''s time for C# people to speak up.
Michael
推荐答案
迈克尔·亚当斯 <无**** @ nomail.com>在留言中写道
news：lo ******************** @ speakeasy.net ...
"Michael Adams" <no****@nomail.com> wrote in message
news:lo********************@speakeasy.net...
我不明白为什么微软不会把同样的精力投入到以C开头的语言中。因为他们做了B......然后他们就会想知道为什么人们会在其他平台上篡改Java，PHP甚至是C ++。
I don''t understand why Microsoft doesn''t put the same kind of energy into
the languages that start with a "C" as they do a "B"...and then they wonder why people defect to Java, PHP, or even C++ on other platforms.
这是因为VB程序员的数量大约是b / b code ++ / C＃程序员的10倍。
-
真相，
James Curran
主页： www.noveltheory.com 工作： www.njtheater.com
博客： www.honestillusion.com 日工作： www.partsearch.com
（注意新工作！）
It''s because there are about 10X as many VB programmers as there are
C/C++/C# programmers.
--
Truth,
James Curran
Home: www.noveltheory.com Work: www.njtheater.com
Blog: www.honestillusion.com Day Job: www.partsearch.com
(note new day job!)
" Michael Adams" <无**** @ nomail.com>在留言中写道
news：lo ******************** @ speakeasy.net ...
"Michael Adams" <no****@nomail.com> wrote in message
news:lo********************@speakeasy.net...
我不知道你是否注意到了，但似乎微软正在失去对C＃的兴趣，而是把精力投入到Visual Basic.NET中。
I don''t know if you have noticed, but it seems like Microsoft is losing
interest in C#, and putting their energy into Visual Basic.NET instead.
我完全不同意！如果是这样的话，为什么C＃甚至存在......？
我一直认为这是微软有意提出的意见
使用像C＃这样的语言（几乎）具有
C ++的所有功能，但是（几乎）像VB一样容易编程。我认为詹姆斯·柯伦（James Curran）对VB（.NET）阵营中仍然存在大量人数的点b / b
点，但完全可以预期会减少C＃侵蚀了VB的用户群。
I would disagree entirely! If that were the case, why does C# even exist...?
It''s always been my opinion that it was Microsoft''s intention to come up
with a language like C# which had (pretty much) all of the functionality of
C++ but was (almost) as easy to programme in as VB. I think James Curran''s
point about the number of people still heavily in the VB(.NET) camp is spot
on, but fully expect that to diminish as C# erodes the VB user base.
一个原因似乎是各种背景的程序员明显倾向于转向C＃，这是一个很多VB程序员的天堂还没到.NET。 IMO有一个共同的努力，将更多的VB6社区转移到托管代码，并且VB.NET 2.0中引入的更改使VB.NET对VB6程序员没有吸引力（例如缺少编辑和继续）已经解决了。
问候
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/richardb/weblog
nntp：//news.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp/< eW**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>
Michael Adams <无**** @ nomail.com>在留言中写道
news：lo ******************** @ speakeasy.net ...
One reason why there seems to have been an apparent tendency for programmers from all backgrounds to move to C#, a uge number of VB programmers haven''t moved to .NET yet. IMO there is a concerted effort to move much more of the VB6 community to managed code and with the changes introduced in VB.NET 2.0 a number of the things that made VB.NET unattractive to VB6 programmers (such as lack of edit and continue) have been addressed.
Regards
Richard Blewett - DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/richardb/weblog
nntp://news.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp/<eW**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>
"Michael Adams" <no****@nomail.com> wrote in message
news:lo********************@speakeasy.net...
我不明白为什么微软不会把同样的精力投入到以C开头的语言中。因为他们做了B......然后他们就会想知道为什么人们会在其他平台上篡改Java，PHP甚至是C ++。
I don''t understand why Microsoft doesn''t put the same kind of energy into
the languages that start with a "C" as they do a "B"...and then they wonder why people defect to Java, PHP, or even C++ on other platforms.
这是因为VB程序员的数量大约是b / b code ++ / C＃程序员的10倍。
-
真相，
James Curran
主页： www.noveltheory.com 工作： www.njtheater.com
博客： www.honestillusion.com 日工作： www.partsearch.com
（注意新工作！）
---
收到的邮件经过无病毒认证。
由AVG反病毒系统检查（ http://www.grisoft.com）。
版本：6 .0.760 /病毒库：509 - 发布日期：10/09/2004
[microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp]
It''s because there are about 10X as many VB programmers as there are
C/C++/C# programmers.
--
Truth,
James Curran
Home: www.noveltheory.com Work: www.njtheater.com
Blog: www.honestillusion.com Day Job: www.partsearch.com
(note new day job!)
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.760 / Virus Database: 509 - Release Date: 10/09/2004
[microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp]
这篇关于微软对C＃失去兴趣？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
