未来C标准的装配 [英] assembly in future C standard
问题描述
某些编译器支持__asm {}语句，该语句允许集成C
和原始汇编代码。前段时间我问了一个关于这种
语法的问题，并被告知__asm不是C标准的一部分。我的
问题现在是：
这样的声明是否有可能成为C标准的一部分
将来？在某些情况下使用asm语言是完成一些小任务的最佳方式，因此C和asm的集成将极大地增加C或者至少在我看来。
有没有充分的理由说__asm不是当前C标准的一部分？
我遇到了支持和其他人的编译器忽略__asm
语句显然它仍然不是C标准的一部分。
Some compilers support __asm{ } statement which allows integration of C
and raw assembly code. A while back I asked a question about such
syntax and was told that __asm is not a part of a C standard. My
question now is:
Is there a chance that such statement will become a part of C standard
in the future? In some cases using asm language is the best way to
acomplish some small task, hence integration of C and asm would greatly
enhence C, or atleast it would in my opinion.
Is there a good reason why __asm is not a part of current C standard?
I have bumped into compilers that support and others that ignore __asm
statement so obviously it is still not a part of C standard.
推荐答案
fermineutron说：
fermineutron said:
有些编译器支持__asm {}语句，它允许集成C
和原始汇编代码。前段时间我问了一个关于这种
语法的问题，并被告知__asm不是C标准的一部分。我的
问题现在是：
这样的声明是否有可能成为C标准的一部分
将来？
Some compilers support __asm{ } statement which allows integration of C
and raw assembly code. A while back I asked a question about such
syntax and was told that __asm is not a part of a C standard. My
question now is:
Is there a chance that such statement will become a part of C standard
in the future?
No.
No.
在某些情况下使用asm语言是
$的最佳方式b $ b完成一些小任务，因此C和asm的集成将极大地增加C，或者至少它会在我看来。
In some cases using asm language is the best way to
acomplish some small task, hence integration of C and asm would greatly
enhence C, or atleast it would in my opinion.
No.
No.
有没有充分理由说__asm不是当前C标准的一部分？
Is there a good reason why __asm is not a part of current C standard?
是的。
-
Richard Heathfield
Usenet是一个奇怪的地方 - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
电子邮件：rjh在上面的域名（但显然放弃了www）
Yes.
--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at above domain (but drop the www, obviously)
周六，2006-10-28 at 09:01 -0700，fermineutron写道：
On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 09:01 -0700, fermineutron wrote:
这样的声明是否有可能成为C标准的一部分
将来？在某些情况下使用asm语言是完成一些小任务的最佳方式，因此C和asm的集成将极大地增加C或者至少在我看来。
Is there a chance that such statement will become a part of C standard
in the future? In some cases using asm language is the best way to
acomplish some small task, hence integration of C and asm would greatly
enhence C, or atleast it would in my opinion.
我会说不，但系统（）是C标准的一部分
使这个答案有问题。
I''d say no, but the fact that system() is a part of the C standard
makes that answer questionable.
是否有充分理由说__asm不是当前C标准的一部分？
Is there a good reason why __asm is not a part of current C standard?
它在不同的架构中100％不便携，这与C的精神相反。
-
Andrew Poelstra< http：//www.wpsoftware.net/projects/>
It''s 100% non-portable among different architectures, which is contrary
to the spirit of C.
--
Andrew Poelstra <http://www.wpsoftware.net/projects/>
" fermineutron" < fr ********** @ yahoo.comwrites：
"fermineutron" <fr**********@yahoo.comwrites:
有没有充分理由说__asm不是当前C标准的一部分？
Is there a good reason why __asm is not a part of current C standard?
它会使C语言不便携。
-
祝你好运，_ _
.o。 | Serenly Enlightened Majesty of o''，=。/`o
..o |计算机科学，Michalmina86 Nazarewicz（oo）
ooo + - < mina86 * tlen.pl> ---< jid：mina86 * chrome.pl> - ooO - （_） - Ooo--
It''ll make C language not portable.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenly Enlightened Majesty of o'' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +--<mina86*tlen.pl>---<jid:mina86*chrome.pl>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--
这篇关于未来C标准的装配的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
