购买标准 [英] Purchasing The Standard
问题描述
在过去的九年里，我想自己是一名C ++程序员，我认为这是时候我实际获得了标准的副本而不是
依赖于声称准确代表标准的其他来源。即使
最佳意图的作者或新闻组海报也不准确
代表标准。
我按照FAQ链接到 http://www.techstreet.com/ 并搜索了14882作为
建议。
提出以下页面...
http://www.techstreet.com/cgi-bin/ne...82&searchType=
docno& newSearch = 1& sort = rel& submit.x = 15& submit.y = 16
除了它们的分发格式，谁能告诉我各个项目之间的差价？
？我很困惑哪一个
将是最准确的信息来源。
ISO / IEC 14882：2003和INCITS / ISO之间的区别是什么？ / IEC 14882：2003
？
前者只能以325美元的价格购买一本平装书。后者可以以$ 18的价格购买
作为PDF文件。我的破产和失业的自己更喜欢后者更好，但是我想要知道如果我给b $ b订购它我不会得到什么。
此外，在目前的标准被取代之前还需要多长时间？如果
它只有六个月到一年也许我应该等。什么是所有的&b $ b $'和TR''。是免费提供还是必须购买？
任何见解都会受到赞赏。
问候，
Brian F. Seaberg
PS我也在考虑获得TCPPLSE。如果我只能购买
标准文件或最值得推荐的Stroustrup书籍？在
上，标准可能是相当干燥的读数，但它是权威的
我想知道全部真相。另一方面，Stroustrup一书
可能不仅讨论了语言的元素，而且讨论了与那些语言元素相关的最佳实践
，这些元素可能更适合
不会写编译器和工具的人。我非常想知道
语言，但我不能说我想成为一名语言律师。我宁愿知道如何有效地使用该语言的一部分，而不是知道内外语言，但不知道如何有效地应用它。
After having fancied myself a C++ programmer for the last nine years I figured
it was about time that I actually obtain a copy of the standard rather than
relying on other sources that claim to accurately represent the standard. Even
the best intentioned author or newsgroup poster is capable of inaccurately
representing the standard.
I followed the FAQ link to http://www.techstreet.com/ and searched for 14882 as
suggested.
That brought up the following page...
http://www.techstreet.com/cgi-bin/ne...82&searchType=
docno&newSearch=1&sort=rel&submit.x=15&submit.y=16
Aside from the format in which they are distributed, can anyone tell me the
difference between the various items presented? I am confused about which one
would be the most accurate source of information.
What is the difference between ISO/IEC 14882:2003 and INCITS/ISO/IEC 14882:2003
?
The former can only be purchased as a softcover book for $325. The latter can
be purchased as a PDF document for $18. My broke and unemployed self likes the
latter much better, but I want to be aware of what I won''t be getting if I
order it.
Furthermore, how long will it be until the current standard is superceded? If
it is only six-months to a year maybe I should wait. And what about all the
TC''s and TR''s. Are those freely available or must they also be purchased?
Any insight would be appreciated.
Regards,
Brian F. Seaberg
P.S. I am also thinking about getting TCPPLSE. If I could only buy either the
standard document or the Stroustrup book, which would most recommended? On the
one hand the standard is probably pretty dry reading, but it is authoritative
and I want to know the whole truth. On the other hand the Stroustrup book
probably discusses not only the elements of the language but the best practices
associated with those language elements which may be more appropriate for
someone who isn''t going to be writing compilers and tools. I want to know the
language very well, but I can''t say I want to be a language lawyer. I would
rather know how to effectively use a subset of the language rather than know
the language inside and out but not know how to apply it effectively.
推荐答案
325。后者可以
作为
325. The latter can
be purchased as a PDF document for
18的PDF文档购买。我的破产和失业的自己更喜欢后者更好，但是我想要知道如果我给b $ b订购它我不会得到什么。
此外，在目前的标准被取代之前还需要多长时间？如果
它只有六个月到一年也许我应该等。什么是所有的&b $ b $'和TR''。是免费提供还是必须购买？
任何见解都会受到赞赏。
问候，
Brian F. Seaberg
PS我也在考虑获得TCPPLSE。如果我只能购买
标准文件或最值得推荐的Stroustrup书籍？在
上，标准可能是相当干燥的读数，但它是权威的
我想知道全部真相。另一方面，Stroustrup一书
可能不仅讨论了语言的元素，而且讨论了与那些语言元素相关的最佳实践
，这些元素可能更适合
不会写编译器和工具的人。我非常想知道
语言，但我不能说我想成为一名语言律师。我宁愿知道如何有效地使用该语言的一部分，而不是知道内外语言，但不知道如何有效地应用它。
18. My broke and unemployed self likes the
latter much better, but I want to be aware of what I won''t be getting if I
order it.
Furthermore, how long will it be until the current standard is superceded? If
it is only six-months to a year maybe I should wait. And what about all the
TC''s and TR''s. Are those freely available or must they also be purchased?
Any insight would be appreciated.
Regards,
Brian F. Seaberg
P.S. I am also thinking about getting TCPPLSE. If I could only buy either the
standard document or the Stroustrup book, which would most recommended? On the
one hand the standard is probably pretty dry reading, but it is authoritative
and I want to know the whole truth. On the other hand the Stroustrup book
probably discusses not only the elements of the language but the best practices
associated with those language elements which may be more appropriate for
someone who isn''t going to be writing compilers and tools. I want to know the
language very well, but I can''t say I want to be a language lawyer. I would
rather know how to effectively use a subset of the language rather than know
the language inside and out but not know how to apply it effectively.
DaKoadMunky写道：
DaKoadMunky wrote:
在过去的9年里，我自认为是一名C ++程序员后，我想到了现在是时候我实际上获得了标准的副本而不是依赖于声称准确代表标准的其他来源。甚至
最好的作者或新闻组海报也能够不准确地代表标准。
我按照常见问题链接 http://www.techstreet.com/ 并按照
建议搜索了14882.
上一页...
http://www.techstreet.com/cgi-bin/ne...82&searchType=
docno& newSearch = 1& sort = rel& submit.x = 15& submit.y = 16
除了分发它们的格式外，还有谁能告诉我各个项目之间的差异？我很困惑哪一个
是最准确的信息来源。
ISO / IEC 14882：2003和INCITS / ISO / IEC 14882：2003之间的区别是什么？ >？
前者只能作为绿皮书购买
After having fancied myself a C++ programmer for the last nine years I figured
it was about time that I actually obtain a copy of the standard rather than
relying on other sources that claim to accurately represent the standard. Even
the best intentioned author or newsgroup poster is capable of inaccurately
representing the standard.
I followed the FAQ link to http://www.techstreet.com/ and searched for 14882 as
suggested.
That brought up the following page...
http://www.techstreet.com/cgi-bin/ne...82&searchType=
docno&newSearch=1&sort=rel&submit.x=15&submit.y=16
Aside from the format in which they are distributed, can anyone tell me the
difference between the various items presented? I am confused about which one
would be the most accurate source of information.
What is the difference between ISO/IEC 14882:2003 and INCITS/ISO/IEC 14882:2003
?
The former can only be purchased as a softcover book for
这篇关于购买标准的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
