呼吁签署J2 [英] Call for signatories for J2
问题描述
J2提案尽可能完整。
http://www.aminus.org/rbre/python/pydec.html
补丁几近完成;只有__future__声明和一些
文件调整仍然存在。它应该今天在SourceForge更新或明天
。
这是所有希望签署提案的人的电话，
反对或弃权。请在
comp.lang.python上发帖（回复此内容很好），或发送电子邮件至
fu ****** @ amor.org （对于你们这些人来说，这里有一个链接：
mailto：fu ***** *@amor.org）。请提供您的全名。如果你拒绝
该提案，请同时包含一个_short_描述你为何拒绝它的原因
。您不会收到有关拒绝或
描述的回复;它将仅用于Guido的信息目的。
请在签署前仔细阅读提案。特别是，
仔细阅读你b
签名的声明（赞成，反对或弃权）;每个都是明确的，意思是它所说的。
再次感谢那些以各种形式贡献的人。希望我们
可以很快将这个装饰问题搁置下来继续前进。
Robert Brewer
MIS
Amor Ministries
fu******@amor.org
PS我将在星期五早上到星期天晚上外出（美国太平洋时间的b $ b），所以请尽早告诉你。如果有足够的音量，我会在我离开之前将它推广到Guido。否则，我会在周日晚上等待
完成编辑名称。
Robert Brewer写道：
J2提案尽可能完整。
http://www.aminus.org/rbre/python/pydec.html
补丁几近完成;只有__future__声明和一些
文件调整仍然存在。它应该在今天的SourceForge或明天更新。
这是一个呼吁所有希望签署提案的人，无论是针对，反对还是弃权。请在
comp.lang.python上签名（回复此内容很好）
我的签名：FOR
我的名字：Fernando Perez。定期发送电子邮件：fperez AT colorado DOT edu
我是IPython的作者，是@proposal受影响的工具之一;在J2论文中引用了IPython
。所以我想这是我对这个问题的''官方'立场。
我喜欢它有两个原因：
a）它将为我节省一些改变ipython的愚蠢工作（特别是
docs），它会保存我的ipython用户不得不改变他们的工作习惯。
b）我喜欢它;我认为论文作者以一系列非常一致的理由证明了
的理念。到目前为止，很明显没有语法会被大家视为完美，但我发现提案中的论点清晰，
聪明且足够令人信服很高兴。
感谢那些愿意付出足够努力将这种语言转化为理性和富有成效的讨论的人们。
最好，
f
假设简单的python用户符合资格，你可以添加我的名字赞成
您的建议。
如果有人使用这个帖子进行签名，也许
最好为亲/反对/无动于衷地创建子线程，
只是为了让数数更加简单。
Ciao
- --------------------------------
Francesco Bochicchio
新手投票赞成。
Jamie Radcliffe
The J2 proposal is as complete as it will ever be.
http://www.aminus.org/rbre/python/pydec.html
The patch is nearly complete; only the __future__ declaration and some
document tweaks remain. It should be updated on SourceForge today or
tomorrow.
This is a call for all who wish to sign the proposal, either for,
against, or abstaining. Please sign by either posting on
comp.lang.python (replying to this is fine), or sending email to
fu******@amor.org (for some of you reading this, here''s a link:
mailto:fu******@amor.org). Please include your full name. If you reject
the proposal, please also include a _short_ description of why you are
rejecting it. You will not receive a reply regarding the rejection or
description; it will be included for Guido''s information purposes only.
Please read the proposal carefully before signing. In particular,
carefully read the statement (for, against, or abstaining) to which you
are signing your name; each is explicit and means exactly what it says.
Thanks again to those who have contributed in all forms. Hopefully, we
can put this decorator issue to rest soon and move on.
Robert Brewer
MIS
Amor Ministries
fu******@amor.org
P.S. I''ll be out of town from Friday morning to Sunday evening (U.S.
Pacific Time), so get your name in early. Given sufficient volume, I''ll
promote this to Guido just before I leave; otherwise, I''ll wait ''til
Sunday night to finish compiling names.解决方案Robert Brewer wrote:
The J2 proposal is as complete as it will ever be.
http://www.aminus.org/rbre/python/pydec.html
The patch is nearly complete; only the __future__ declaration and some
document tweaks remain. It should be updated on SourceForge today or
tomorrow.
This is a call for all who wish to sign the proposal, either for,
against, or abstaining. Please sign by either posting on
comp.lang.python (replying to this is fine)
My signature : FOR
My Name: Fernando Perez. Regular email: fperez AT colorado DOT edu
I am the author of IPython, one of the affected tools by the @proposal; IPython
was referenced in the J2 paper. So I guess this is my ''official'' stance on
the matter. I like it for 2 reasons:
a) It will save me a bunch of silly work changing ipython (especially the
docs), and it will save my ipython users having to change their work habits.
b) I just like it; I think the paper authors did a fantastic job justifying the
idea with a set of very coherent reasons. By now it''s clear no syntax will be
deemed ''perfect'' by everyone, but I found the arguments in the proposal clear,
intelligent and convincing enough to be happy going along.
Thanks to those who were willing to put enough effort to turn a potential
disaster for the language into a rational and productive discussion.
Best,
f
Assuming that simple python users qualify, you can add my name in favor
of your proposal.
If people are using this thread for signing themselves, maybe
it would be better to create subthreads for pro/against/indifferent,
just to make counting more simple.
Ciao
---------------------------------
Francesco Bochicchio
A newbie votes FOR.
Jamie Radcliffe
这篇关于呼吁签署J2的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
