Xah的Edu角落:批评与建设性批评 [英] Xah's Edu Corner: Criticism vs Constructive Criticism

查看:53
本文介绍了Xah的Edu角落:批评与建设性批评的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

批评与建设性批评


Xah Lee,2003-01

很多聪明的人对批评很困惑,
特别是我们的免费演讲?免费为所有互联网时代。当

时,他们会说一些建设性的批评是值得欢迎的?他们大多意味着

a ?? bitching和抱怨不受欢迎??实际上很少有人会这样做意味着没有建议可能解决方案的批评意味着没有建议吗?b $ b b欢迎或不礼貌的批评不受欢迎??。


这种洞察力很重要。作为互联网使用极客的肆意哄骗

习惯不是任何形式的批评。


人们可以受到尊重并以批评为生,

评论家,但不是婊子。当一个人真正重视意见时,你需要经常在没有资格的情况下批评。只是很高兴

宝贵的批评可能会从

公众的专家那里免费获得。您有资格获得什么样的反馈意见,您的

反馈会受到影响。 (对于政治或

有争议的话题尤其如此)


许多unix极客理解这一点的一个简单方法是

密码学行业。


如果一个人真的希望有价值的批评是有礼貌的,或者使用

解决方案或者建设性的? (无论那意味着什么),一个人通常需要支付



----

这篇文章存档于:
http://xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/writ/criticism.html


Xah
xa*@xahlee.org

A ?? http://xahlee.org/

Criticism versus Constructive Criticism

Xah Lee, 2003-01

A lot intelligent people are rather confused about criticism,
especially in our a??free-speecha?? free-for-all internet age. When
they say a??constructive criticisms are welcomea?? they mostly mean
a??bitching and complaints not welcomea??. Rarely do people actually
mean that a??criticism without suggestion of possible solutions are not
welcomea?? or a??impolite criticism not welcomea??.

Such discernment is important. Wanton bitching as internet-using geeks
are used to is not criticism is any form.

People can be respected and make a living out of criticisms, called
critics, but not bitching. And when one really value opinions, you
often want criticism without qualifications. Just be happy that
valuable criticisms may come to you free from the experts in the
public. The instant you qualify what kind of feedback are welcome, your
feedback is compromised. (this is particularly so for political or
controversial subjects)

One easy way for many of the unix geeks to understand this is the
cryptology industry.

If one really desires valuable criticisms that is polite or with
solutions or a??constructivea?? (whatever that means), one usually have
to pay.
----
This post is archived at:
http://xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/writ/criticism.html

Xah
xa*@xahlee.org
a?? http://xahlee.org/

推荐答案

" Xah Lee" < xa*@xahlee.org>写道:


随后会有大量免费的,有建设性的批评。


1.了解发布内容的位置。
"Xah Lee" <xa*@xahlee.org> writes:

A large amount of free, constructive criticism follows.

1. Learn where to post things.
批评与建设性批评


2.了解何时将标题中的单词大写。

Xah Lee,2003-01


3.了解何时发布内容。

很多聪明的人对批评感到相当困惑,特别是在我们的免费演讲中?免费为所有互联网时代。什么时候
他们说建设性的批评是受欢迎的?他们大多意味着婊子和投诉不受欢迎??人们实际上很少意味着没有提出可能解决方案的批评意见不是很受欢迎吗?还是一种不礼貌的批评不受欢迎?


4.尝试很多。


5.学习如何使用逗号。


6.没有人说欢迎建设性的批评。他们使用

单数,就像你一样。


7.学习如何使用逗号。


8了解如何使用并行结构。

这种识别很重要。随着互联网使用的极客习惯肆无忌惮地习惯不是批评是任何形式。


9.一般来说,使用句子形式如so< noun>是

< adjective>"在法律写作中甚至不赞成;但它b / b
几乎不适合使用婊子这个词。在下一个

的句子中。

人们可以受到尊重并以批评为生,称为批评者,但不是婊子。当一个人真正重视意见时,你经常需要批评而没有资格。只是很高兴有可能从公众的专家那里得到有价值的批评。您有资格获得什么样的反馈意见,您的
反馈会受到影响。 (对于政治或有争议的话题尤其如此)


10.你仍然坚持认为一般意义上的批评是

复数的东西。它不是。而且,这些批评也是如此。不是我们打电话给评论家。我们称人们为他们提出批评。我会让这个

一张幻灯片,但是你用一句话来回反复多次

来侥幸逃脱它。


11.学习如何将动词与其名词相匹配。


12.你仍然没有想出何时使用批评。我会给你另一个提示

:在你的写作中没有任何地方。


13.了解你的专家是什么时候批评是适当的,当它不是时。


14.如果你不能弄清楚什么时候不要复制批评这个词,

我不要我不知道为什么我希望你知道什么时候使用是而不是

是。但是,我仍然建议你学习这个不那么微妙的

英语语法点。


15.括号中的句子仍然是句子 - 大写和

适当地点缀。


16.当你做一个全面的,一般的声明时,它有助于支持

与某种与逻辑相关的证据。

许多unix极客了解这一点的一个简单方法是密码学行业。


17.了解何时将专有名词大写。


18.密码学行业不是一种方式。这是一个行业。学习

如何写出以有意义的方式使用单词的清晰句子。一个

这样做的方法是利用动词。

如果一个人真的希望有价值的批评是有礼貌的,或者是
解决方案还是建设性的? (无论那意味着什么),通常都有支付。


19.规则是第三人称单数主题采用是。并且

第三人称复数主语采取是。你似乎有这个

倒退。


20.如果你提出有关建设性批评的论文,你需要
应该定义这个术语,而不是像这样使用括号内的

肩耸肩。


21.第三人称单数主语采取有,有,不是有。


22.当你写一些东西时,即使它不受欢迎

与你发布的地方相关,实际上制作

a点是有帮助的,而不仅仅是做几个明显和荒谬之间交替的陈述。

这篇文章是存档的at:
http://xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/writ/ critism.html

23.如果三年前的某些内容出现在网络上,则会被

Google编入索引。如果有人想阅读它,他们会通过

Google找到它。没有必要在不适当的新闻组上发布。

Xah
xa*@xahlee.org <一个?? http://xahlee.org/
Criticism versus Constructive Criticism
2. Learn when to capitalize words in a title.
Xah Lee, 2003-01
3. Learn when to post things.
A lot intelligent people are rather confused about criticism,
especially in our a??free-speecha?? free-for-all internet age. When
they say a??constructive criticisms are welcomea?? they mostly mean
a??bitching and complaints not welcomea??. Rarely do people actually
mean that a??criticism without suggestion of possible solutions are not
welcomea?? or a??impolite criticism not welcomea??.
4. Try "many."

5. Learn how to use commas.

6. Nobody says "constructive criticisms are welcome." They use the
singular, as should you.

7. Learn how to use commas.

8. Learn how to use parallel structure.
Such discernment is important. Wanton bitching as internet-using geeks
are used to is not criticism is any form.
9. Generally, the use of sentence forms like "such <noun> is
<adjective>" is even frowned upon in legal writing anymore; but it
is almost never appropriate to use the word "bitching" in the next
sentence.
People can be respected and make a living out of criticisms, called
critics, but not bitching. And when one really value opinions, you
often want criticism without qualifications. Just be happy that
valuable criticisms may come to you free from the experts in the
public. The instant you qualify what kind of feedback are welcome, your
feedback is compromised. (this is particularly so for political or
controversial subjects)
10. You''re still insisting that criticism in the general sense is a
plural thing. It is not. Also, these "criticisms" are not what we
call "critics." We call the people making them critics. I''d let this
one slide but you bounce back and forth too many times in one sentence
to get away with it.

11. Learn how to match a verb to its noun.

12. You still haven''t figured out when to use "criticisms." I''ll give
you another hint: nowhere within your writing.

13. Learn when your "expert" criticism is apropos and when it is not.

14. If you can''t figure out when not to pluralize the word criticism,
I don''t know why I expect you to know when to use "is" instead of
"are." However, I still recommend you learn this not-so-subtle
point of English grammar.

15. Sentences in parentheses are still sentences - capitalize and
punctuate appropriately.

16. When you make a sweeping, general statement, it helps to support
it with some kind of logically-related evidence.
One easy way for many of the unix geeks to understand this is the
cryptology industry.
17. Learn when to capitalize proper nouns.

18. The cryptology industry is not a "way." It is an industry. Learn
how to write clear sentences that use words in meaningful ways. One
way to do this is to utilize verbs.
If one really desires valuable criticisms that is polite or with
solutions or a??constructivea?? (whatever that means), one usually have
to pay.
19. The rule is that third-person singular subjects take "is" and
third-person plural subjects take "are." You seem to have this
backwards.

20. If you are offering a dissertation on constructive criticism, you
ought to define the term rather than using a parenthetical
shoulder-shrug like this.

21. Third-person singular subjects take "has," not "have."

22. When you write something, even when it is not welcome or not
relevant to the place you post it, it is helpful to actually make
a point rather than just making several statements of things which
alternate between obvious and nonsensical.
This post is archived at:
http://xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/writ/criticism.html
23. If something from three years ago is on the web, it is indexed by
Google. If someone wants to read it, they will find it via
Google. There is no need to post it on inappropriate newsgroups.

Xah
xa*@xahlee.org
a?? http://xahlee.org/




(这不是建设性的批评,只是一个问题:)你是你网页的

总和吗?



(This isn''t constructive criticism, but just a question:) Are you the
sum of your web page?

Ari Johnson< ia ******* @ gmail.com>写道:


24.了解什么时候不回复巨魔(并打扰几个团体,而

这样做)。


-

John Bokma自由软件开发人员

&

经验丰富的Perl程序员: http://castleamber.com/
Ari Johnson <ia*******@gmail.com> wrote:

24. Learn when not to reply to a troll (and bother several groups while
doing so).

--
John Bokma Freelance software developer
&
Experienced Perl programmer: http://castleamber.com/




< mf ***** @ aep.com>在消息中写道

新闻:OF ************************************ ******* ************ @ aep.com ...

<mf*****@aep.com> wrote in message
news:OF******************************************* ************@aep.com...
这些参赛者是否请用他们的
取消名单与Python相关的争议?
Would these contestants please GET OFF THE LIST with their
non-Python-related contentiousness?



[剪掉长篇大论的抱怨]


[snip long repost of the very stuff complained about]


这篇关于Xah的Edu角落:批评与建设性批评的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆