热门帖子 [英] Top posting
问题描述
这个主题已经在这一组中多次出现过去的最后一年。这个组中的几个人似乎对这个
主题感到强烈。我不打算通过这次讨论来破坏其他线程，我想我们可以在这里讨论它。
因为我在这里领先，我''请说明我对此事的看法。
我真的不在乎这种或那种方式。我使用谷歌，而且对于它所有的错误，确实做了一件事：它隐藏了引用的文字。所以，我只是
看到新帖子的上方或下方有一个小标记，上面写着，
显示引用的文字。因此，发布样式对我来说并不重要。
但是，我确实理解并非所有人都使用Google。自从他们最新一轮的改进以来，双重支持b $ b。设法使
界面变得更加糟糕，比以前更糟糕。其他新闻读者可能不会隐藏引用的文字，因此发布风格对于那些使用这类新闻阅读器的人来说更重要。
那就是说，当一个有效的线程因为一个人的帖子而发布时，它真的很让我生气，因为一个人发帖，
请不要发帖"这导致了不可避免的反应，
什么是最热门的帖子？然后线程的原始点是
相当多的丢失，因为解释之后是一个冗长的辩论...
和另一个线程在一堆帖子下死亡关于发布风格。
我对那些对此主题有强烈兴趣的人有一个建议。这不是一个非常原始的建议：我看到其他人这样做了一段时间
回来了。在最热门的帖子上写一个小网页：它是什么，为什么它是b
坏等等然后改变你的签名行说请不要顶＃
发布;看到这里并提供指向网页的链接。这很简单，
不引人注目，每次发帖都可以让更多的转换。即使
更好，它几乎没有机会脱轨，否则就有用了
对话。
This subject has come up several times in this group over the last
year. Several people in this group seem to feel strongly about this
topic. Rather than derail other threads with this discussion, I
figured we could talk about it here.
Since I''m leading off here, I''ll state my opinion on the matter.
I really don''t care one way or the other. I use Google, and for all
its faults, does do one thing right: it hides quoted text. So, I just
see the new post either above or below a little marker that says,
"Show quoted text". As a result, posting style doesn''t matter a whit
to me.
However, I do understand that not everyone uses Google. Doubly so
since their latest round of "improvements" managed to make the
interface much, much worse than it was before. Other news readers may
not hide quoted text, and so posting style matters more to people who
use such news readers.
That said, it really pisses me off when an otherwise productive /
interesting thread goes off the rails because one person posts,
"Please don''t top post." This leads to the inevitable response,
"What''s top posting?" and then the original point of the thread is
pretty-much lost as the explanation is followed by a lengthy debate...
and another thread dies under a pile of posts about posting style.
I have a suggestion for those who feel strongly on this topic. It''s
not a terribly original suggestion: I saw someone else do this a while
back. Write a little Web page on top posting: what it is, why it''s
bad, etc. Then change your signature line to say, "Please don''t top
post; see here" and provide a link to the Web page. It''s simple,
unobtrusive, and every time you post you may make more converts. Even
better, it stands little or no chance of derailing otherwise useful
conversations.
推荐答案
我担心你总是会有新一批的新手教授
顶级帖子。在10多年的时间里，我一直在使用新闻组，这个问题并没有消失。
就我个人而言，我看不到排斥，燃烧，倾斜的问题，
在火刑柱上燃烧，等等。所有这样做的人。大多数人得到了点之后
，其他人都是巨魔。
" Bruce Wood" < br ******* @ canada.com写信息
新闻：11 ********************* @ y80g2000hsf .googlegro ups.com ...
I''m afraid you''re always going to have a new crop of newbies to teach about
top-posting. In the 10+ years I''ve been using newsgroups, this issue hasn''t
gone away.
Personally, I don''t see the problem with ostracizing, flaming, skewing,
burning at the stake, et. all someone who does this. Most get the point
after that, the others are trolls.
"Bruce Wood" <br*******@canada.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@y80g2000hsf.googlegro ups.com...
这个主题已经在这个小组中多次出现过去
年。这个组中的几个人似乎对这个
主题感到强烈。我不打算通过这次讨论来破坏其他线程，我想我们可以在这里讨论它。
因为我在这里领先，我''请说明我对此事的看法。
我真的不在乎这种或那种方式。我使用谷歌，而且对于它所有的错误，确实做了一件事：它隐藏了引用的文字。所以，我只是
看到新帖子的上方或下方有一个小标记，上面写着，
显示引用的文字。因此，发布样式对我来说并不重要。
但是，我确实理解并非所有人都使用Google。自从他们最新一轮的改进以来，双重支持b $ b。设法使
界面变得更加糟糕，比以前更糟糕。其他新闻读者可能不会隐藏引用的文字，因此发布风格对于那些使用这类新闻阅读器的人来说更重要。
那就是说，当一个有效的线程因为一个人的帖子而发布时，它真的很让我生气，因为一个人发帖，
请不要发帖"这导致了不可避免的反应，
什么是最热门的帖子？然后线程的原始点是
相当多的丢失，因为解释之后是一个冗长的辩论...
和另一个线程在一堆帖子下死亡关于发布风格。
我对那些对此主题有强烈兴趣的人有一个建议。这不是一个非常原始的建议：我看到其他人这样做了一段时间
回来了。在最热门的帖子上写一个小网页：它是什么，为什么它是b
坏等等然后改变你的签名行说请不要顶＃
发布;看到这里并提供指向网页的链接。这很简单，
不引人注目，每次发帖都可以让更多的转换。即使
更好，它几乎没有机会脱轨，否则有用
对话。
This subject has come up several times in this group over the last
year. Several people in this group seem to feel strongly about this
topic. Rather than derail other threads with this discussion, I
figured we could talk about it here.
Since I''m leading off here, I''ll state my opinion on the matter.
I really don''t care one way or the other. I use Google, and for all
its faults, does do one thing right: it hides quoted text. So, I just
see the new post either above or below a little marker that says,
"Show quoted text". As a result, posting style doesn''t matter a whit
to me.
However, I do understand that not everyone uses Google. Doubly so
since their latest round of "improvements" managed to make the
interface much, much worse than it was before. Other news readers may
not hide quoted text, and so posting style matters more to people who
use such news readers.
That said, it really pisses me off when an otherwise productive /
interesting thread goes off the rails because one person posts,
"Please don''t top post." This leads to the inevitable response,
"What''s top posting?" and then the original point of the thread is
pretty-much lost as the explanation is followed by a lengthy debate...
and another thread dies under a pile of posts about posting style.
I have a suggestion for those who feel strongly on this topic. It''s
not a terribly original suggestion: I saw someone else do this a while
back. Write a little Web page on top posting: what it is, why it''s
bad, etc. Then change your signature line to say, "Please don''t top
post; see here" and provide a link to the Web page. It''s simple,
unobtrusive, and every time you post you may make more converts. Even
better, it stands little or no chance of derailing otherwise useful
conversations.
-----原始消息-----
来自：" Scott M." < s - *** @nospam.nospam>
新闻组：microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp
发送时间：2007年4月4日星期三6:46 PM
主题：回复：热门帖子
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott M." <s-***@nospam.nospam>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: Top posting
我恐怕你总会有一个新的关于顶级帖子的新手教授
。在我使用新闻组的10多年里，这个
问题并没有消失。
就我个人而言，我看不到排斥，燃烧，
倾斜，在火刑柱上燃烧等问题。所有这样做的人。大多数人获得了b $ b b之后，其他人都是巨魔。
I''m afraid you''re always going to have a new crop of newbies to teach
about top-posting. In the 10+ years I''ve been using newsgroups, this
issue hasn''t gone away.
Personally, I don''t see the problem with ostracizing, flaming,
skewing, burning at the stake, et. all someone who does this. Most get
the point after that, the others are trolls.
< grin>
感谢帖子......我笑了起来。
Bill
<grin>
Thanks for the post...I got a chuckle out of.
Bill
>
" Bruce Wood" < br ******* @ canada.com写信息
新闻：11 ********************* @ y80g2000hsf .googlegro ups.com ...
>
"Bruce Wood" <br*******@canada.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@y80g2000hsf.googlegro ups.com...
>这个主题在过去的这一年中曾多次出现在这个主题中。这个小组中的几个人似乎对这个话题感到强烈。我没有在讨论中破坏其他线索，我想我们可以在这里讨论它。
由于我在这里领导，我会就此事发表意见。
我真的不在乎这种或那种方式。我使用谷歌，并且为了它的所有错误，确实做了一件事：它隐藏了引用文本。所以，我只是在一个标记上方或下方看到新帖子，上面写着
显示引用的文字。因此，发布样式对我来说无关紧要。
然而，我确实理解并非所有人都使用Google。自从他们最新一轮的改进以来，这一切都是如此。设法使
界面变得更加糟糕，比以前更加糟糕。其他新闻读者可能不会隐藏引用的文字，因此发布风格对于使用此类新闻阅读器的人更为重要。
这就是说，当其他方面它真的很生气富有成效/
有趣的帖子因为一个人发帖而失败，
请不要发帖。这导致了不可避免的反应，
什么是最热门的帖子？然后，线程的原始点几乎丢失了，因为解释之后是冗长的争论......
另一个线程在一堆关于发布风格的帖子中死亡。
对于那些对此主题有强烈感受的人，我有一个建议。这不是一个非常原始的建议：我看到其他人这样做了
而
回来了。在最热门的帖子上写一个小网页：它是什么，为什么它不好等等。然后改变你的签名行说请不要顶＃
帖子;看到这里并提供指向网页的链接。这很简单，不引人注目，每次发帖都可以让你有更多的皈依者。即使更好，也很少或没有机会脱轨，否则有用的话题。
>This subject has come up several times in this group over the last
year. Several people in this group seem to feel strongly about this
topic. Rather than derail other threads with this discussion, I
figured we could talk about it here.
Since I''m leading off here, I''ll state my opinion on the matter.
I really don''t care one way or the other. I use Google, and for all
its faults, does do one thing right: it hides quoted text. So, I just
see the new post either above or below a little marker that says,
"Show quoted text". As a result, posting style doesn''t matter a whit
to me.
However, I do understand that not everyone uses Google. Doubly so
since their latest round of "improvements" managed to make the
interface much, much worse than it was before. Other news readers may
not hide quoted text, and so posting style matters more to people who
use such news readers.
That said, it really pisses me off when an otherwise productive /
interesting thread goes off the rails because one person posts,
"Please don''t top post." This leads to the inevitable response,
"What''s top posting?" and then the original point of the thread is
pretty-much lost as the explanation is followed by a lengthy
debate...
and another thread dies under a pile of posts about posting style.
I have a suggestion for those who feel strongly on this topic. It''s
not a terribly original suggestion: I saw someone else do this a
while
back. Write a little Web page on top posting: what it is, why it''s
bad, etc. Then change your signature line to say, "Please don''t top
post; see here" and provide a link to the Web page. It''s simple,
unobtrusive, and every time you post you may make more converts. Even
better, it stands little or no chance of derailing otherwise useful
conversations.
" Scott M." < s - *** @ nospam.nospamwrote in message
news：e％**************** @ TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl ...
"Scott M." <s-***@nospam.nospamwrote in message
news:e%****************@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
我担心你总会有一批新人教授
关于顶级帖子。在我使用新闻组的10多年里，这个
问题并没有消失。
就我个人而言，我看不到排斥，燃烧，倾斜的问题，
在火刑柱上燃烧，等等。所有这样做的人。大多数人在此之后获得了点数，其他人都是巨魔。
I''m afraid you''re always going to have a new crop of newbies to teach
about top-posting. In the 10+ years I''ve been using newsgroups, this
issue hasn''t gone away.
Personally, I don''t see the problem with ostracizing, flaming, skewing,
burning at the stake, et. all someone who does this. Most get the point
after that, the others are trolls.
不错的元巨魔。
Nice meta-troll.
这篇关于热门帖子的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
