微软：摆脱VB.NET - 现在！ [英] Microsoft: Get rid of VB.NET -- now !
问题描述
这是对微软的推荐。
VB.net和c＃几乎完全等价。
我知道为什么微软发明了VB .net - 将旧式的VB6脚本编写成
a真正的OO世界：.Net。
但现在，真正的痛苦，是试图找到有关编码的信息，
并且必须搜索vb和c＃示例并将vb翻译成c＃
（我选择的语言）。
我不介意翻译，但我的想法是，在谷歌，当我搜索时，我通常会添加c＃作为关键字 - 这几乎是不包括vb
有时存在的例子。
我对微软说：开始淘汰vb.net并将社区折叠成
c ＃ - 它将是一个更强大，更紧密，更强大的社区。一个
可以与不断增长的Linux mono c＃社区合并。
这听起来几乎与独裁者开始了。如果你没有这么做我想要的那么你就不行了。
走开巨魔
备用变更 < SP ********* @ spam.spam>在消息中写道
新闻：ED *************** @ newsread3.news.pas.earthlin k.net ...这是对微软的推荐。
VB.net和c＃几乎完全等价。
我知道为什么微软发明了VB.net - 断断续续的老式VB6脚本
进入一个真正的OO世界：.Net。
但现在，真正的痛苦是，试图找到有关
编码的信息，并且必须搜索vb和c＃示例并将vb翻译为c＃
（我选择的语言）。
我不介意翻译，但我在想的是在谷歌，当我搜索时，我通常添加c＃作为关键字 - 这几乎排除了有时存在的vb
示例。
我对微软说：开始淘汰vb.net并折叠社区
进入c＃ - 它将是一个更强大，更紧密，更强大的社区。一个可以与不断增长的Linux mono c＃社区合并的一个。
" Spare变化与QUOT; < SP ********* @ spam.spam>在消息中写道
新闻：ED *************** @ newsread3.news.pas.earthlin k.net ...这是对微软的推荐。
VB.net和c＃几乎完全相同。
他们很相似，但他们正在分开。我认为这两种语言不同，每种语言都会有不同的处理方式，而且你应该这么好。
但现在，什么是真正的痛苦，是试图找到有关
编码，
和必须搜索vb和c＃示例并将vb翻译为c＃
（我选择的语言）的信息。
这真的是一个小问题，如果你遇到真正的问题，你可以在这里得到帮助，大多数海报至少能够揭露基本想法<两种语言都是
。你不需要*编码示例来看看如何做事，
只是说明要做什么，使用什么类别的方法等等。
询问是没有害处的，真的，不要疯了。
我不介意翻译，但我在想的是在谷歌当我搜索时，我通常会添加c＃作为关键字 - 这几乎不包括有时存在的vb
示例。
然后键入.NET而不是...
无论如何，这是我见过的最弱的反VB推理...你能不能
至少宣称它是一个可怕的语言并且应该被销毁以保持它免受腐败的思想或其他东西的侵害？放弃一种语言，因为它的b / b $ b不便于搜索，这不是一个很好的理由，直到最近，
对C＃来说一样好（你会是感到惊讶的是＃
搞砸了事情。
>它们很相似，但它们正在分开。
真的吗？
以什么方式，特别是...
Daniel O''Connell [C＃MVP]" < onyxkirx @ - NOSPAM--comcast.net>写在
消息新闻：OJ **************** @ TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl ...
备用变更 < SP ********* @ spam.spam>在消息中写道
新闻：ED *************** @ newsread3.news.pas.earthlin k.net ...这是一个对微软的推荐。
VB.net和c＃几乎完全等价。
我认为两种语言不同，每种语言的处理方式都不同，你应该好吧。
但现在，真正令人痛苦的是，试图找到有关
编码，
和搜索vb和c＃示例并将vb翻译为
c＃（我选择的语言）。
它真的是一个小问题，如果你遇到真正的问题，你可以在这里获得帮助，大多数海报都至少能够用两种语言公开基本的
想法。你不需要*编码示例，看看如何做
的事情，只是说明要做什么，使用什么类的方法等等。
没有伤害在问，真的，只是不要疯了。
我不介意翻译，但我在想的是在谷歌当我搜索时，我通常会添加c＃作为关键字 - 这几乎不包括有时存在的vb
示例。
然后键入.NET。 ..
无论如何，这是我见过的最弱的反VB推理......你能否至少声明它是一个可怕的语言并且应该被销毁到
让它免受腐败的思想或其他什么？删除一种语言因为它不便于搜索不是一个很好的理由，直到最近，
对C＃来说也一样好（你会惊讶于＃br / >搞砸了。
---
外发邮件已通过无病毒验证。
经检查AVG反病毒系统（ http://www.grisoft.com）。 />
版本：6.0.752 /病毒库：503 - 发布日期：2004年9月3日
This is a recommendation to Microsoft.
VB.net and c# are almost exactly equivalent.
I know why Microsoft invented VB.net -- to wean old style VB6 scripters into
a true OO world: .Net.
But now, what is really a pain, is trying to find information about coding,
and having to search through vb and c# examples and translate the vb to c#
( my chosen language ).
I don''t mind the translation, but what I mind is that in Google, when I
search, I usually add "c#'' as a keyword -- which pretty much excludes vb
examples that sometimes exist.
I say to Microsoft: start obsolescing vb.net and folding the community into
c# -- it will be a stronger, tighter, more powerful community. One which
can merge with the growing Linux mono c# community.
Man this sounds almost the same as how a dictator gets started. If your not
doing it how i want then your not doing it right.
Go away troll
"Spare Change" <sp*********@spam.spam> wrote in message
news:ED***************@newsread3.news.pas.earthlin k.net...This is a recommendation to Microsoft.
VB.net and c# are almost exactly equivalent.
I know why Microsoft invented VB.net -- to wean old style VB6 scripters into a true OO world: .Net.
But now, what is really a pain, is trying to find information about coding, and having to search through vb and c# examples and translate the vb to c#
( my chosen language ).
I don''t mind the translation, but what I mind is that in Google, when I
search, I usually add "c#'' as a keyword -- which pretty much excludes vb
examples that sometimes exist.
I say to Microsoft: start obsolescing vb.net and folding the community into c# -- it will be a stronger, tighter, more powerful community. One which
can merge with the growing Linux mono c# community.
"Spare Change" <sp*********@spam.spam> wrote in message
news:ED***************@newsread3.news.pas.earthlin k.net...This is a recommendation to Microsoft.
VB.net and c# are almost exactly equivalent.
They are similar but they are growing apart. I consider both languages
different, would approach problems differently in each, and you should as
well.
But now, what is really a pain, is trying to find information about
coding,
and having to search through vb and c# examples and translate the vb to c#
( my chosen language ).
Its really a minor issue, and if you are having real problems you can
probably get help here, most posters are atleast able to expose basic ideas
in both languages. You don''t *need* coding examples to see how to do things,
just explinations of what to do, what classes\methods to use, etc.
There is no harm in asking, really, just don''t go nuts.
I don''t mind the translation, but what I mind is that in Google, when I
search, I usually add "c#'' as a keyword -- which pretty much excludes vb
examples that sometimes exist.
Then type .NET instead...
Anyway, this is the weakest anti-VB reasoning I''ve seen yet...could you
atleast declare that its a horrible langauge and should be destroyed to keep
it from corrupting minds or something? Dropping a language because its
inconvient to search is not a very good reason and, until pretty recently,
would have been just as good for C#(You''d be surprised how often the #
messed things up).
> They are similar but they are growing apart.
Really ?
In what way, specifically...
"Daniel O''Connell [C# MVP]" <onyxkirx@--NOSPAM--comcast.net> wrote in
message news:OJ****************@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
"Spare Change" <sp*********@spam.spam> wrote in message
news:ED***************@newsread3.news.pas.earthlin k.net...This is a recommendation to Microsoft.
VB.net and c# are almost exactly equivalent.
I consider both languages different, would approach problems differently in each, and you should as
well.But now, what is really a pain, is trying to find information about
coding,
and having to search through vb and c# examples and translate the vb to c# ( my chosen language ).
Its really a minor issue, and if you are having real problems you can
probably get help here, most posters are atleast able to expose basic
ideas in both languages. You don''t *need* coding examples to see how to do things, just explinations of what to do, what classes\methods to use, etc.
There is no harm in asking, really, just don''t go nuts.
I don''t mind the translation, but what I mind is that in Google, when I
search, I usually add "c#'' as a keyword -- which pretty much excludes vb
examples that sometimes exist.
Then type .NET instead...
Anyway, this is the weakest anti-VB reasoning I''ve seen yet...could you
atleast declare that its a horrible langauge and should be destroyed to
keep it from corrupting minds or something? Dropping a language because its
inconvient to search is not a very good reason and, until pretty recently,
would have been just as good for C#(You''d be surprised how often the #
messed things up).
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.752 / Virus Database: 503 - Release Date: 9/3/2004
这篇关于微软：摆脱VB.NET - 现在！的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
