C ++胜过C !! [英] C++ wins over C !!
问题描述
看到这篇文章，C似乎在这里失去了
我们还在用C语言编程，只是因为那些凡人发现它很容易
开发一个C编译器比C ++编译器。考虑到C ++可以做的每件事都可以做到，而且反之亦然。那么为什么C？
我个人喜欢C，C很好，但C ++很棒。
http://groups.google.com/ groups？hl = e ... ing.google.com
-Paul。
"保罗" < BG ***** @ yahoo.com>在消息中写道
news：d8 ************************* @ posting.google.co m ... < blockquote class =post_quotes>看到这篇文章，C似乎在这里失去了
我们还在用C编程，只是因为那些凡人发现很容易开发一个C编译器而不是C ++编译器。考虑到C ++可以做到C可以做到的每一件事，而且反之亦然。那么为什么C？
我个人喜欢C，C很好，但C ++很棒。
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl= e ... ing.google.com
-Paul。
是否真的有必要权衡一切与一切否则在
尝试确定价值？
请不要拖钓。
语言是工具。将C ++与C进行比较就像将锤子与
螺丝刀进行比较。 C有其用途，C ++有其用途。
Ben Kucenski
www.icarusindie.com
" Paul" < BG ***** @ yahoo.com>在消息中写道
news：d8 ************************* @ posting.google.co m ... < blockquote class =post_quotes>看到这篇文章，C似乎在这里失去了
我们还在用C编程，只是因为那些凡人发现很容易开发一个C编译器而不是C ++编译器。考虑到C ++可以做到C可以做到的每一件事，而且反之亦然。那么为什么C？
我个人喜欢C，C很好，但C ++很棒。
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl= e ... ing.google.com
-Paul。
Paul写道：
看到这篇文章，C似乎在这里失去了
定义失败。
我们还在用C语言编程，只是b'因为那些凡人发现开发C编译器比C ++编译器容易。
哪个凡人？
考虑到C ++可以做什么？C可以
每个东西
不是这样。下面的代码片段不会用我知道的任何C ++编译器编译
：
int main（void）
{int new = 1，除了= 2，throw = 3;
返回new *除+ throw;
};
那么为什么C？<我个人喜欢C，C很好，但C ++很棒。
C ++过于复杂。它试图成为一种高水平的语言和一种低级语言，而且两者都惨遭失败
。
Erik
-
+ --------------------------------- -------------------------- +
Erik de Castro Lopo 没有**** @ mega-nerd.com （是的，这是有效的）
+ --------- -------------------------------------------------- +
开源和自由软件意味着您永远不会牺牲质量
的代码，以满足未参与的人们设定的截止日期
软件开发过程。
See this post, C seems to be loosing here
Are we still programming in C, just b''cause those mortals find it easy
to develop a C compiler than C++ compiler. Considering C++ can do
every thing that C can and Vice Versa is not true. then why C?
I personally like C, C is good but C++ is great.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ing.google.com
-Paul.
"Paul" <bg*****@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d8*************************@posting.google.co m...See this post, C seems to be loosing here
Are we still programming in C, just b''cause those mortals find it easy
to develop a C compiler than C++ compiler. Considering C++ can do
every thing that C can and Vice Versa is not true. then why C?
I personally like C, C is good but C++ is great.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ing.google.com
-Paul.
Is it really necessary to weigh everything up against everything else in an
attempt to determine value?
Please don''t troll.
Languages are tools. Comparing C++ to C is like comparing a hammer to a
screwdriver. C has its uses and C++ has its uses.
Ben Kucenski
www.icarusindie.com
"Paul" <bg*****@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d8*************************@posting.google.co m...See this post, C seems to be loosing here
Are we still programming in C, just b''cause those mortals find it easy
to develop a C compiler than C++ compiler. Considering C++ can do
every thing that C can and Vice Versa is not true. then why C?
I personally like C, C is good but C++ is great.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ing.google.com
-Paul.
Paul wrote:
See this post, C seems to be loosing here
Define "losing".
Are we still programming in C, just b''cause those mortals find it easy
to develop a C compiler than C++ compiler.
Which mortals?
Considering C++ can do
every thing that C can
Not true. The folliwng snippet of code wont compile
with any C++ compiler I know of:
int main (void)
{ int new = 1, except = 2, throw =3;
return new * except + throw;
};
then why C?
I personally like C, C is good but C++ is great.
C++ is overly complicated. It tries to be a high level
language and a low level language and fails miserably
at both.
Erik
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Erik de Castro Lopo no****@mega-nerd.com (Yes it''s valid)
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Open Source and Free Software means that you never sacrifice quality
of the code for meeting deadlines set up by people not participating
directly in the software development process.
这篇关于C ++胜过C !!的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
