C和C ++源$ C $ C分析工具 [英] C and C++ source code profiling tools
问题描述
可能重复：结果
什么（对于C ++）
有没有什么好的工具分析源$ C $ C这是C和C ++的组合。哪些优点和缺点的，哪些你用过并会建议以供使用。请不要误会我从谷歌工具的列表。我能做到这一点，我想是利用人谁使用了这些工具，并知道它们的优点和缺点的个人经验。结果
先谢谢了。
Are there any good tools to profile a source code which is mix of of C and C++. What are the pros and cons of any, and which ones have you used and would reccomend for usage. Please do not get me a list of tools from google. I can do that too, what i want is to leverage the personal experience of someone who has used these tools and knows the pros and cons about them.
Thanks in advance.
推荐答案
我发现 gprof的是最好的CPU热点探查，并谷歌性能工具的是最好的采样分析器。 C和C ++都工作。
I've found gprof to be the best CPU hotspot profiler, and Google Performance Tools to be the best sampling profiler. Both work for C and C++.
在我看来有在Windows 没有很好的分析工具。
In my opinion there are no good profiling tools on Windows.
- 只有GCC
- 工程与C和C ++
- 只有把CPU时间和code的 的内部二进制文件，你需要的一切你想要的轮廓静态链接
- 非常准确
- 添加一个小的开销，以执行
- GCC only
- Works with C and C++
- Only treats CPU time, and code inside the binary, you need everything you wish to profile statically linked in
- Very accurate
- Adds a small overhead to execution
- 我觉得它需要的GNU工具链
- 有时无法识别符号
- 非常定制
- 输出到一个巨大的各种格式，包括Callgrind格式，并且自动加载KCacheGrind调试你
- 拥有不同的内存分析工具也
- 是一个的采样的探查，以最小的开销
- I think it requires the GNU tool chain
- Occasionally fails to identify symbols
- Very customizable
- Outputs to a huge variety of formats, including the Callgrind format, and automatically loads KCacheGrind for you
- Has various memory profiling tools also
- Is a sampling profiler, with minimal overhead
- Alternative to -pg with Clang?
- What's your favorite profiling tool (for C++)
- Alternatives to gprof
- C++ Code Profiler
- Confusing gprof output
这篇关于C和C ++源$ C $ C分析工具的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
