关于C ++演员的奇怪文章 [英] Strange Article on C++ casts

问题描述

我在informit.com上发现了一篇关于C ++演员的文章

http://www.informit.com/guides/conte...eqNum= 285& rl = 1


奇怪的是作者说下面的代码将*不*

编译：

double d = 15.95;

int n = static_cast< int（d）;


然后他继续对C ++演员发起攻击。我看不出

为什么它不能工作的任何原因我尝试使用MS和INTEL

编译器并且编译时没有问题。 />

有谁知道他想说的是什么???


欢呼，

/ Charles

Hi,

I found an article on informit.com that talks about C++ casts

http://www.informit.com/guides/conte...eqNum=285&rl=1

The strange thing is the author says the following code will *not*
compile:
double d=15.95;
int n= static_cast<int(d);

and then he goes on to launch an attack against C++ casts. I can''t see
any reason why it shouldn''t work and I tried with the MS and INTEL
compilers and it compiles with nary a problem.

Does anyone know what he''s trying to say???

cheers,
/Charles

推荐答案

charlie写道：

charlie wrote:

奇怪的是作者说的下面的代码将*不*

编译：

double d = 15.95;

int n = static_cast< int（d）;

然后他继续对C ++演员发起攻击。我看不出

为什么它不能工作的任何原因我尝试使用MS和INTEL

编译器并且编译时没有问题。 />
有谁知道他想说什么？

The strange thing is the author says the following code will *not*
compile:
double d=15.95;
int n= static_cast<int(d);
and then he goes on to launch an attack against C++ casts. I can''t see
any reason why it shouldn''t work and I tried with the MS and INTEL
compilers and it compiles with nary a problem.
Does anyone know what he''s trying to say???

我几乎可以肯定作者试图说：C ++很糟糕，我最喜欢

语言更好


-

Salu2

I''m almost sure that the author tries to say: "C++ sucks, my favorite
language is better"

--
Salu2

1月11，上午11:56，JuliánAlbo< JULIANA ...... @ terra.eswrote：

On Jan 11, 11:56 am, Julián Albo <[e-mail]:

charlie写道：

charlie wrote:

奇怪的是作者说下面的代码将*不*

编译：

double d = 15.95;

int n = static_cast< int（d）;

然后他继续发起对C ++演员的攻击。我看不出

为什么它不能工作的任何原因我尝试使用MS和INTEL

编译器并且编译时没有问题。 />
有谁知道他想说什么？我几乎肯定作者试图说：C ++很糟糕，我最喜欢的

The strange thing is the author says the following code will *not*
compile:
double d=15.95;
int n= static_cast<int(d);
and then he goes on to launch an attack against C++ casts. I can''t see
any reason why it shouldn''t work and I tried with the MS and INTEL
compilers and it compiles with nary a problem.
Does anyone know what he''s trying to say???I''m almost sure that the author tries to say: "C++ sucks, my favorite

语言更好


-

Salu2

language is better"

--
Salu2

< ; grinWell我会同意你的意见，但他是C ++的家伙。即使是在C ++标准委员会任职，他也是b $ b。所以这似乎是一个奇怪的错误。

<grinWell I would agree with you normally but he''s a C++ guy. He''s
even served on the C++ standards committee. So it seems to be a strange
mistake to make.

charlie写道：

charlie wrote:

我在informit.com上发现了一篇关于C ++演员的文章

http://www.informit.com/guides/conte。 ..eqNum = 285& rl = 1


奇怪的是作者说下面的代码将*不*

编译：

double d = 15.95;

int n = static_cast< int（d）;

Hi,

I found an article on informit.com that talks about C++ casts

http://www.informit.com/guides/conte...eqNum=285&rl=1

The strange thing is the author says the following code will *not*
compile:
double d=15.95;
int n= static_cast<int(d);

我实际找到的代码是：


int n;

double d = 15.95;

int n = static_cast< int（d）;


由于变量n被定义两次而无法编译。删除了n的第一个定义后，代码编译得很好并做了它应该做的事情。

The code I actually found there was:

int n;
double d=15.95;
int n= static_cast<int(d);

which won''t compile as the variable n is defined twice. Having removed
the first definition of n, the code compiles fine and does what it should.

然后他继续发布一个攻击C ++演员。

and then he goes on to launch an attack against C++ casts.

显然他对这些事情一无所知，并且懒得在他的教科书中查看

。

Obviously he doesn''t know anything about them and won''t bother to look
into his textbook.

我看不到

任何理由为什么它不起作用我试过MS和INTEL

编译器并且编译时没有问题。


有谁知道他想说什么？

I can''t see
any reason why it shouldn''t work and I tried with the MS and INTEL
compilers and it compiles with nary a problem.

Does anyone know what he''s trying to say???

不。忽略他。


问候，

Stuart

Nope. Ignore him.

Regards,
Stuart

这篇关于关于C ++演员的奇怪文章的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！