Webhost不会更改服务器配置 [英] Webhost won't change server config

问题描述

大家好，


几天前，我向这个新闻组发布了一条消息，说明我工作过的设计是什么？在一个客户端没有在Mozilla浏览器中显示它的

样式表。

我被其他几个新闻组成员告知我更有见识

，我在这个问题上，我应该联系网络主机，并要求他们改变服务器从内容类型发送CSS的方式

" application /的x pointplus"到text / css相反。


我这么做了，但他们回复我说：

我们不对共享服务器上的配置进行任何更改。您的网站与很多其他人一起共享

，如果我们进行更改，这可能会影响他们。


这听起来像是一个合理的回复吗？这种改变对共享同一台服务器的其他网站有多大影响？

我可以告诉客户去专用服务器，但那将是

昂贵。

我也可以告诉客户改变网络主机，但我觉得在这之前需要更多

信息，如果它''可以解决这个问题

与现在的主持人一起，它将使整个生活变得更加轻松。


所有信息/建议将不胜感激。


谢谢，

Tony。

Hi all,

A couple of days ago I posted a message to this newsgroup relating to the
fact that a design I''d worked on for a client wasn''t displaying its
stylesheet in Mozilla browsers.
I was advised by a couple of other newsgroup members far more knowledgeable
that I on this subject that I should contact the Web host and ask them to
alter the way the server was sending the CSS from content type
"application/x-pointplus" to "text/css" instead.

This I duly did but they have come back to me saying:
"We do not make any changes to config on shared servers. Your site is shared
with lots of others, and if we make changes this could impact on them".

Does this sound like a reasonable response? How badly could this alteration
impact on other websites that share the same server?
I could tell the client to go for a dedicated server, but that would be
costly.
I could also tell the client to change Web hosts, but I feel I need more
information before doing this, and if it''s possible to resolve this matter
with the current host it would make life a lot easier all round.

All information / advice will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Tony.

推荐答案

" Tony Carnell" <至** @ fluvius.co.uk>在消息中写道

新闻：KS ****************** @ news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk ...

"Tony Carnell" <to**@fluvius.co.uk> wrote in message
news:KS******************@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...

大家好，

几天前，我向这个新闻组发布了一条消息，说明我为客户设计的设计并非如此。在Mozilla浏览器中显示它的样式表。
我被其他几个新闻组成员建议了解我在这个问题上的知识，我应该联系Web主机并要求他们application / x-pointplus"到text / css相反。

我已经做了，但他们回复我说：
我们不对共享服务器上的配置进行任何更改。您的网站与很多其他网站共享
，如果我们进行更改，这可能会影响他们。

Hi all,

A couple of days ago I posted a message to this newsgroup relating to the
fact that a design I''d worked on for a client wasn''t displaying its
stylesheet in Mozilla browsers.
I was advised by a couple of other newsgroup members far more knowledgeable that I on this subject that I should contact the Web host and ask them to
alter the way the server was sending the CSS from content type
"application/x-pointplus" to "text/css" instead.

This I duly did but they have come back to me saying:
"We do not make any changes to config on shared servers. Your site is shared with lots of others, and if we make changes this could impact on them".

我很好奇有多少个网站要求扩展名为.css

的文件作为除text / css之外的任何内容类型提供。怎么会变成

application / x-pointplus首先？那个内容类型是什么？

I''m curious how many web sites require that files with the extension ".css"
be served as any content type OTHER than "text/css". How did it get to be
"application/x-pointplus" in the first place? What IS that content type?

" Tony Carnell" <至** @ fluvius.co.uk>在消息中写道

新闻：KS ****************** @ news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk ...

"Tony Carnell" <to**@fluvius.co.uk> wrote in message
news:KS******************@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...

大家好，

几天前，我向这个新闻组发布了一条消息，说明我为客户设计的设计并非如此。在Mozilla浏览器中显示它的样式表。
我被其他几个新闻组成员建议了解我在这个问题上的知识，我应该联系Web主机并要求他们application / x-pointplus"到text / css相反。

我已经做了，但他们回复我说：
我们不对共享服务器上的配置进行任何更改。您的网站与很多其他网站共享
，如果我们进行更改，这可能会影响他们。

Hi all,

A couple of days ago I posted a message to this newsgroup relating to the
fact that a design I''d worked on for a client wasn''t displaying its
stylesheet in Mozilla browsers.
I was advised by a couple of other newsgroup members far more knowledgeable that I on this subject that I should contact the Web host and ask them to
alter the way the server was sending the CSS from content type
"application/x-pointplus" to "text/css" instead.

This I duly did but they have come back to me saying:
"We do not make any changes to config on shared servers. Your site is shared with lots of others, and if we make changes this could impact on them".

我很好奇有多少个网站要求扩展名为.css

的文件作为除text / css之外的任何内容类型提供。怎么会变成

application / x-pointplus首先？那个内容类型是什么？

I''m curious how many web sites require that files with the extension ".css"
be served as any content type OTHER than "text/css". How did it get to be
"application/x-pointplus" in the first place? What IS that content type?

2004年4月12日星期一15:39:32 +0100，Tony Carnell< to ** @ fluvius.co .uk>

写道：

On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:39:32 +0100, Tony Carnell <to**@fluvius.co.uk>
wrote:

大家好，

几天前我发布了一条消息给这个新闻组事实上，我为客户工作的设计并没有在Mozilla浏览器中显示它的样式表。
我被其他几个新闻组成员建议更多<知识渊博我知道我应该联系Web主机并要求他们改变服务器从内容类型发送CSS的方式
application / x- pointplus"到text / css代替。


Apache服务器？如果是这样，只需使用.htaccess文件。

这个我已经适当但他们已经回复我说：
我们不对共享服务器上的配置进行任何更改。您的网站与很多其他网站共享
，如果我们进行更改，可能会影响他们。

Hi all,

A couple of days ago I posted a message to this newsgroup relating to the
fact that a design I''d worked on for a client wasn''t displaying its
stylesheet in Mozilla browsers.
I was advised by a couple of other newsgroup members far more
knowledgeable
that I on this subject that I should contact the Web host and ask them to
alter the way the server was sending the CSS from content type
"application/x-pointplus" to "text/css" instead.
Apache server? If so, simply use a .htaccess file.
This I duly did but they have come back to me saying:
"We do not make any changes to config on shared servers. Your site is
shared
with lots of others, and if we make changes this could impact on them".

不合理。到目前为止text / css更为普遍适用。


再次向他们解释，注意到你的客户*真的需要*服务

..css作为文本/ CSS。如果仍然没有帮助，请使用

Apache转发它们以支持主机，您可以在其中设置.htaccess并忘记它。

Unreasonable. By far text/css is more universally appropriate.

Explain to them again, noting that your client *really needs to* serve
..css as text/css. If still no help, dump them in favor of a host using
Apache, where you can set an .htaccess and forget about it.

这篇关于Webhost不会更改服务器配置的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！