K& R2还好吗？ [英] K&R2 Still good?
问题描述
嘿大家，
我是一名Java程序员，介于新手与高级之间。我想
知道是否仍然建议阅读The C Programming
Language第2版？这个版本于1988年发布，现在是2007年的b $ b，近20年。另外，既然它已经老了，是否有一些补充教程建议配合使用？感谢您的建议。
Rajiv Battula
< blockquote> ra***********@gmail.com 写道：
大家好，
我是一名Java程序员，介于新手与高级之间。我想
知道是否仍然建议阅读The C Programming
Language第2版？这个版本于1988年发布，现在是2007年的b $ b，近20年。另外，既然它已经老了，是否有一些补充教程建议配合使用？感谢您的
建议。
这本书仍然是对C的一个很好的介绍。请记住，C99
还没有完全实现和广泛实施从来没有
会。在你通过K& R2并完成所有练习之后，你将足够精通阅读和理解标准本身，（或
草案它），并详细说明C99及其附加内容。
以下是一些资源：
书籍：
======
1. Kernighan和Ritchie的C编程语言第二版
2. C：参考Harbison和Steele手册
3. C Heathfield释放，Kirby等人
4. Peter Van der Linden的专家C编程
在线教程：
=================
Steve Summit'的C笔记：
< http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/cclass/>
Tom Torf'的C资源：
< http://cprog.tomsweb.net/>
Steve Summit还保留了非常有用的C FAQ：
< http://www.c-faq.com/>
还有一个clc" wiki&quo t;：
< http://clc-wiki.net/>
其他资源包括：
< http://www.lysator.liu.se/c/>
< http://www.dinkumware.com/manuals/>
< http://www-ccs.ucsd.edu/c/>
< http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/> ;
< http://www.knosof.co.uk/cbook/cbook.html>
< http://www.cpax.org.uk /prg/portable/c/index.php>
10月6日晚上11点55分，santosh< santosh .... @ gmail。 comwrote：
rajiv.batt ... @ gmail.com写道：
嘿大家，
我是一名Java程序员，介于新手与高级之间。我想
知道是否仍然建议阅读The C Programming
Language第2版？这个版本于1988年发布，现在是2007年的b $ b，近20年。另外，既然它已经老了，是否有一些补充教程建议配合使用？感谢您的
建议。
这本书仍然是对C的精彩介绍。请记住，C99
还没有完全实现和广泛实施从来没有
会。在你通过K& R2并完成所有练习之后，你将足够精通阅读和理解标准本身，（或
草案它），并详细说明C99及其附加内容。
以下是一些资源：
书籍：
======
1. Kernighan和Ritchie的C编程语言第二版
2. C：参考Harbison和Steele手册
3. C Heathfield释放，Kirby等人
4. Peter Van der Linden的专家C编程
在线教程：
=================
Steve Summit'的C笔记：
< http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/cclass/>
Tom Torf'的C资源：
< http://cprog.tomsweb.net/>
Steve Summit还保留了非常有用的C FAQ：
< http://www.c-faq.com/>
还有一个clc" wiki"：
< http://clc-wiki.net/>
其他资源包括：
< http ：//www.lysator.liu.se/c/>
< http://www.dinkumware.com/manuals/>
< http ：//www-ccs.ucsd.edu/c/>
< http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/>
< http://www.knosof.co.uk/cbook/cbook.html>
< http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/portable/c /index.php>
感谢您的资源，我看过Steve Summit的常见问题解答，但没有看到
笔记或任何其他优秀链接。有一个问题，如果C99是一个
标准为什么不编译器实现它？是因为它的功能很难实现吗？
"拉吉夫巴图拉 < ra *********** @ gmail.comwrote in message
news：11 ******************* ***@o3g2000hsb.googlegro ups.com ...
standard为什么不编译器实现它？是因为它的功能
难以实现吗？
我看到它的方式，这是因为（到目前为止）没有对它的需求很多。
-Mike
Hey everyone,
I am a Java programmer, somewhere between novice to advanced. I wanted
to know if it is still recommended to read "The C Programming
Language" 2nd Edition? This edition was released in 1988, it is now
2007, almost 20 years. Also, since it is so old, is there some
supplemental tutorial recommend to go along with it? Thanks for your
advice.
Rajiv Battula
ra***********@gmail.com wrote:
Hey everyone,
I am a Java programmer, somewhere between novice to advanced. I wanted
to know if it is still recommended to read "The C Programming
Language" 2nd Edition? This edition was released in 1988, it is now
2007, almost 20 years. Also, since it is so old, is there some
supplemental tutorial recommend to go along with it? Thanks for your
advice.The book remains an excellent introduction to C. Keep in mind that C99
hasn''t yet been implemented completely and widely and probably never
will. After you go through K&R2, and do all the exercises, you''ll be
proficient enough to read and understand the Standard itself, (or a
draft of it), and work out the details of C99 and it''s extras.
Here are some resources:
Books:
======
1. The C Programming Language Second Edition by Kernighan and Ritchie
2. C: A Reference Manual by Harbison and Steele
3. C Unleashed by Heathfield, Kirby et al.
4. Expert C Programming by Peter Van der Linden
Online tutorials:
=================
Steve Summit''s C notes:
<http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/cclass/>
Tom Torf''s C resources:
<http://cprog.tomsweb.net/>
Also Steve Summit maintains the very useful C FAQ:
<http://www.c-faq.com/>
There''s also a clc "wiki":
<http://clc-wiki.net/>
Other resources include:
<http://www.lysator.liu.se/c/>
<http://www.dinkumware.com/manuals/>
<http://www-ccs.ucsd.edu/c/>
<http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/>
<http://www.knosof.co.uk/cbook/cbook.html>
<http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/portable/c/index.php>
On Oct 6, 11:55 pm, santosh <santosh....@gmail.comwrote:rajiv.batt...@gmail.com wrote:Hey everyone,
I am a Java programmer, somewhere between novice to advanced. I wanted
to know if it is still recommended to read "The C Programming
Language" 2nd Edition? This edition was released in 1988, it is now
2007, almost 20 years. Also, since it is so old, is there some
supplemental tutorial recommend to go along with it? Thanks for your
advice.
The book remains an excellent introduction to C. Keep in mind that C99
hasn''t yet been implemented completely and widely and probably never
will. After you go through K&R2, and do all the exercises, you''ll be
proficient enough to read and understand the Standard itself, (or a
draft of it), and work out the details of C99 and it''s extras.
Here are some resources:
Books:
======
1. The C Programming Language Second Edition by Kernighan and Ritchie
2. C: A Reference Manual by Harbison and Steele
3. C Unleashed by Heathfield, Kirby et al.
4. Expert C Programming by Peter Van der Linden
Online tutorials:
=================
Steve Summit''s C notes:
<http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/cclass/>
Tom Torf''s C resources:
<http://cprog.tomsweb.net/>
Also Steve Summit maintains the very useful C FAQ:
<http://www.c-faq.com/>
There''s also a clc "wiki":
<http://clc-wiki.net/>
Other resources include:
<http://www.lysator.liu.se/c/>
<http://www.dinkumware.com/manuals/>
<http://www-ccs.ucsd.edu/c/>
<http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/>
<http://www.knosof.co.uk/cbook/cbook.html>
<http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/portable/c/index.php>Thanks for the resources, I have seen Steve Summit''s FAQ but not the
notes or any of the other great links. Had a question, if C99 is a
standard why don''t compilers implement it? Is it because it''s features
are hard to implement?
"Rajiv Battula" <ra***********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@o3g2000hsb.googlegro ups.com...
Had a question, if C99 is astandard why don''t compilers implement it? Is it because it''s features
are hard to implement?The way I see it, it''s because there is (so far) not
much demand for it.
-Mike
这篇关于K& R2还好吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
