HTML标题文章 [英] HTML headings article
问题描述
我写了一篇关于HTML标题的文章：
http：/ /codewallop.110mb.com/goodprac...adingology.htm
-
Spartanicus
I wrote an article on HTML headings:
http://codewallop.110mb.com/goodprac...adingology.htm
--
Spartanicus
推荐答案
Spartanicus< in ***** @ invalid.invalidwrote：
Spartanicus <in*****@invalid.invalidwrote:
我写了一篇关于HTML标题的文章：
http：//codewallop.110mb.com/goodprac ... adingology.htm
另一个支持（或者如果你更喜欢，赞成:-)跳过
标题级别的论据有时，跳过标题级别更好地反映了
文档结构。
例如，您可能有使用H2的部分。其中一些部分
可能包含使用H3的子部分，而其他部分则没有
子部分。如果这些部分和子部分中的内容需要结构化为块，那么应该使用哪些标题级别
块？ 永不跳过标题级别论证会有一些
" chunks"使用H3，其中一些使用H4。但是，对于所有块，它可以使H4更具结构感，即使这会在没有子部分的部分中跳过H3标题
级别。 br $>
-
Darin McGrew， mc **** @ stanfordalumni.org ， http://www.rahul.net/mcgrew/
网页设计组， da***@htmlhelp.com ， http://www.HTMLHelp.com/
Another argument in favor (or if you prefer, in favour :-) of skipping
heading levels is that sometimes, skipping heading levels better reflects
the document structure.
For example, you might have sections which use H2. Some of those sections
might have subsections which use H3, while others would have no
subsections. If the content within those sections and subsections needs to
be structured into "chunks", what heading levels should be used for those
"chunks"? The "never skip heading levels" argument would have some of the
"chunks" use H3, and some of them use H4. But it can make more structural
sense to use H4 for all the "chunks", even though this skips the H3 heading
level in sections which have no subsections.
--
Darin McGrew, mc****@stanfordalumni.org, http://www.rahul.net/mcgrew/
Web Design Group, da***@htmlhelp.com, http://www.HTMLHelp.com/
"When strong encryption is outlawed, only outlaws jvyy hfr fgebat rapelcgvba."
Scripsit Darin McGrew：
Scripsit Darin McGrew:
Spartanicus< in ** ***@invalid.invalidwrote：
Spartanicus <in*****@invalid.invalidwrote:
>我写了一篇关于HTML标题的文章：
http://codewallop.110mb.com/goodprac...adingology.htm
另一个赞成的论点（或者如果您愿意，赞成:-)跳过
标题级别有时候，跳过标题级别更好
反映了文档结构。
Another argument in favor (or if you prefer, in favour :-) of skipping
heading levels is that sometimes, skipping heading levels better
reflects the document structure.
另一个？在某些情况下，似乎我必须浏览引用的文章以查看其跳过标题级别的
参数。它似乎是
岁的但是h1看起来很大！稍微现代化的衣服中的论点。
该文章抱怨规格中缺乏论据
建议不要跳过标题级别。对我来说，基本的论点是
总是非常明显，不需要提及：你必须不要跳过
等级，原因与你不能跳过数字的原因相同计数1,2，
3，...标题级别表示文档各部分的逻辑嵌套，并且
你不能在第3级嵌套东西而没有任何东西
第二级。但人们显然经常将标题级别视为重要级别，并且规范中的一些不幸的措辞可能会导致这种误解。
"Another"? It seems that I have to scan through the cited article to see its
argument for skipping heading levels in some cases. It seems to be the
age-old "but h1 looks so BIG!!" argument in slightly modernized clothes.
The article complains about lack of arguments in specifications that
recommend that heading levels be not skipped. To me, the basic argument has
always been so evident that it need not be mentioned: you must not skip
levels for the same reason why you must not skip numbers when counting 1, 2,
3, ... Heading levels indicate logical nesting of parts of a document, and
you cannot nest something at the 3rd level without having something at the
2nd level. But people apparently often view the heading levels as "levels of
importance", and some unfortunate wordings in specifications might
contribute to this misconception.
例如，您可能有使用H2的部分。其中一些
部分可能包含使用H3的子部分，而其他部分则包含
没有子部分。
For example, you might have sections which use H2. Some of those
sections might have subsections which use H3, while others would have
no subsections.
这是可能的，虽然它通常是由于结构不足或
分成不好的部分。
That''s possible, though it often results from insufficient structuring or
poor division into sections.
如果这些部分和子部分中的内容需要构造成块，那么什么标题级别应该是
用于那些块？
If the content within those sections and subsections
needs to be structured into "chunks", what heading levels should be
used for those "chunks"?
" Chunk"不是HTML概念或文档结构概念。
"Chunk" is not an HTML concept or a document structuring concept.
永不跳过标题级别论证
会有一些块。使用H3，其中一些使用H4。但是
它可以使H4用于所有块更具结构意义，
即使这会在没有
小节。
The "never skip heading levels" argument
would have some of the "chunks" use H3, and some of them use H4. But
it can make more structural sense to use H4 for all the "chunks",
even though this skips the H3 heading level in sections which have no
subsections.
您似乎假设文档结构存在自下而上，例如
，以便在最低级别我们有段落，它们可能被分成一个更大的块等等。但是，HTML结构化的想法显然是顶部
down。你不可能两种方式都有。
解决方案是根据自上而下设计结构。分部
成部分。如果你不能这样做，你需要标题为块，
那么你可能会决定违反HTML规范中的建议
（以及HTML _standard_，ISO HTML！:-)），但这无助于解释
这是一件好事。
-
Jukka K. Korpela（Yucca）
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
You seem to postulate the existence of document structure "bottom up", e.g.
so that at the lowest level we have paragraphs, they may be grouped into a
larger blocks, etc. However, the HTML structuring idea is clearly "top
down". You can''t really have it both ways.
The solution is to design the structure according to the "top down" division
into parts. If you can''t do this and you need headings for the "chunks",
then you might decide to violate the recommendations in HTML specifications
(and the HTML _standard_, ISO HTML ! :-) ), but it doesn''t help to explain
that this is a good thing to do.
--
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
" Jukka K. Korpela" < jk ****** @ cs.tut.fiwrote in message
news：oQ ******************* @ reader1。 news.saunalahti .fi
"Jukka K. Korpela" <jk******@cs.tut.fiwrote in message
news:oQ*******************@reader1.news.saunalahti .fi
Scripsit Darin McGrew：
Scripsit Darin McGrew:
> Spartanicus< in *** **@invalid.invalidwrote：
>Spartanicus <in*****@invalid.invalidwrote:
>>我写了一篇关于HTML标题的文章：
http://codewallop.110mb.com/goodprac...adingology.htm
赞成（或者如果你更喜欢赞成:-)跳过标题级别的另一个论点是，有时跳过标题级别更好地反映了文档结构。
Another argument in favor (or if you prefer, in favour :-) of
skipping heading levels is that sometimes, skipping heading levels
better reflects the document structure.
另一个？似乎我必须扫描引用的文章来讨论在某些情况下跳过标题级别的论点。好像是年龄很大的b $ b，但是h1看起来很大！稍微论证
现代化服装。
该文章抱怨规格中缺乏论据
建议不要跳过标题级别。对我来说，基本的
参数一直是如此明显，以至于不需要提及：
你必须不要跳过等级，原因是你不能跳过
计数1,2,3时的数字......标题级别表示逻辑
嵌套文档的某些部分，并且您无法在
$ b处嵌套$ b第3级没有第二级别的东西。但人们显然经常将标题级别视为重要级别，
以及规范中的一些不幸的措辞可能会导致
这个误解。
"Another"? It seems that I have to scan through the cited article to
see its argument for skipping heading levels in some cases. It seems
to be the age-old "but h1 looks so BIG!!" argument in slightly
modernized clothes.
The article complains about lack of arguments in specifications that
recommend that heading levels be not skipped. To me, the basic
argument has always been so evident that it need not be mentioned:
you must not skip levels for the same reason why you must not skip
numbers when counting 1, 2, 3, ... Heading levels indicate logical
nesting of parts of a document, and you cannot nest something at the
3rd level without having something at the 2nd level. But people
apparently often view the heading levels as "levels of importance",
and some unfortunate wordings in specifications might contribute to
this misconception.
在非CSS文档中，跳过标题级别是一种阻止
子标题如此激烈的方法： - > ;
-
Max Demian
In a non-CSS document, skipping heading levels is a way to stop the
sub-headings from being so ENORMOUS :->
--
Max Demian
这篇关于HTML标题文章的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
