建议使用页面顶部链接？ [英] Recommended Usage of Top of Page link?
问题描述
我一直在考虑推荐使用页面顶部的用途。链接
应该是什么？
页面底部是否应该只有一个？
它们应该洒在哪里页面上的各个点？
或者它们应该被使用吗？
最近，我一直倾向于最后一个选项因为我的想法是那个
大多数浏览器都有一种方法可以让它回到页面顶部（主页
按钮，滚动条，等等）。好像我从来没有使用页面顶部链接
一页。人们是否有可用性研究的链接证明它是有用的？
Jonathan
在文章< yl ******************* @ news04.bloor.is.net.cable.r ogers.com> ，
Jonathan Snook写道：我一直在考虑推荐使用页面顶部的用法。链接
应该是什么？
页面底部是否只有一个？
它有什么用呢？
它们应该撒在页面的不同位置吗？
不是真的，见下文
或者它们应该被使用吗？
No.
似乎我从不在页面上使用页面顶部链接。
我做了，六个月左右一次。通常当我希望能够使用
后退按钮返回到页面顶部的位置时链接。例如
在页面顶部是文本中使用的术语的定义。
但是，比页面顶部链接要好得多，链接会更好条款
每个术语的定义。
-
Lauri Raittila< http://www.iki.fi/lr> < http://www.iki.fi/zwak/fonts>
Saapi l？hett ?? meili？，jos aihe ei liity ryhm ?? n，tai on yksityinen
tjsp。，mutta？l？ L·海特？ samaa viesti？ meilitse ja ryhm ?? n。
" Lauri Raittila" < LA *** @ raittila.cjb.net>在消息中写道
新闻：MP ************************ @ news.cis.dfn.de ... < blockquote class =post_quotes>在文章< yl ******************* @ news04.bloor.is.net.cable.r ogers.com> ;,我一直在考虑推荐使用页面顶部的用法。
链接应该是什么？
页面底部是否只有一个？
它会有什么用处呢？
它会让你回到页面顶部，导航通常是b
。或者也许有一个常见问题解答，在每个答案之后都有一个链接返回
到页面顶部的问题索引。有点像你的
的术语和定义的例子。
它们应该撒在页面的不同位置吗？
不是真的，请看下面
或者它们应该被使用吗？
否/ blockquote>
不，他们不应该被使用吗？或者不，因为无视即使是一个
选项并且总是有一个页面顶部？ （我猜测前者基于你是如何回答其他一切的。）
似乎我从来没有在页面上使用页面顶部链接。
我这样做，大约六个月左右。通常当我希望能够使用
后退按钮返回到页面顶部的位置时链接。例如
当在页面顶部是文本中使用的术语的定义。
但是，比页面顶部链接更好，将链接到术语
定义来自每个术语使用。
在文章中
< yl ************** *****@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.r ogers.com>在
comp.infosystems。 www.authoring.html ，Jonathan Snook
< go *************** @ snook.ca>写道：我一直在考虑推荐使用页面顶部的用途。链接
应该是什么？
页面底部是否应该只有一个？
它们应该撒在页面的不同位置吗？
或者应该他们会被使用吗？
我认为他们不应该这样。我个人觉得他们很恼火。如果我想要回到页面顶部，我可以使用滚动条
按Ctrl + Home，非常感谢。 :-)
这在某种程度上是个人的事情，但对我来说，他们看起来几乎是业余的点击这里。
我早些时候和他们一起用过我的网站，没有
真的在想我为什么要遵循这个习惯。渐渐地
我一直在除草它们。
-
Stan Brown，Oak Road Systems，Cortland County，美国纽约
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
HTML 4.01规范： http://www.w3.org/TR/ html401 /
验证者： http：//validator.w3 .org /
CSS 2规范： http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/
验证者： http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
I''ve been contemplating what the recommended usage of a "top of page" link
should be?
Should there only ever be one at the bottom of the page?
Should they be sprinkled at various points on the page?
Or should they be used at all?
Lately, I''ve been leaning towards the last option because my thought is that
most browsers have a method to make it back to the top of the page (home
button, scroll bar, whatever). It seems I never use the top of page link on
a page. Do people have links to usability studies demonstrating it''s
usefullness?
Jonathan
In article <yl*******************@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.r ogers.com>,
Jonathan Snook wrote:I''ve been contemplating what the recommended usage of a "top of page" link
should be?
Should there only ever be one at the bottom of the page?
What good would it do there?
Should they be sprinkled at various points on the page?
Not really, see below
Or should they be used at all?
No.
It seems I never use the top of page link on a page.
I do, once in six months or so. Usually when I want to be able to use
back button to go back to the point of "top of page" link. For example
when on the top of page is definitions of terms used in text.
But, much, much better than top of page links would be link to terms
definition from each term used.
--
Lauri Raittila <http://www.iki.fi/lr> <http://www.iki.fi/zwak/fonts>
Saapi l?hett?? meili?, jos aihe ei liity ryhm??n, tai on yksityinen
tjsp., mutta ?l? l?het? samaa viesti? meilitse ja ryhm??n.
"Lauri Raittila" <la***@raittila.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:MP************************@news.cis.dfn.de...In article <yl*******************@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.r ogers.com>,
Jonathan Snook wrote:I''ve been contemplating what the recommended usage of a "top of page" link should be?
Should there only ever be one at the bottom of the page?
What good would it do there?
It would get you back to the top of the page where the navigation usually
resides. Or maybe there''s a FAQ and after every answer there''s a link back
to the top of the page where the index of questions are. Kinda like your
example of terms and definitions.
Should they be sprinkled at various points on the page?
Not really, see belowOr should they be used at all?
No.
No, they shouldn''t be used at all? or no, as in disregard that even being an
option and always have a top of page? (I''m guessing the former based on how
you''ve answered everything else.)
It seems I never use the top of page link on a page.
I do, once in six months or so. Usually when I want to be able to use
back button to go back to the point of "top of page" link. For example
when on the top of page is definitions of terms used in text.
But, much, much better than top of page links would be link to terms
definition from each term used.
In article
<yl*******************@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.r ogers.com> in
comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html, Jonathan Snook
<go***************@snook.ca> wrote:I''ve been contemplating what the recommended usage of a "top of page" link
should be?
Should there only ever be one at the bottom of the page?
Should they be sprinkled at various points on the page?
Or should they be used at all?
I think they should not be. I personally find them irritating. If I
want to go back to the top of the page, I can use the scroll bar of
hit Ctrl+Home, thank you very much. :-)
This is to some extent a personal thing, but to me they look almost
as amateurish as "click here".
I had peppered my Web site with them in the early days, without
really thinking about why I was following this custom. Gradually
I''ve been weeding them out.
--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Cortland County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
HTML 4.01 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/
validator: http://validator.w3.org/
CSS 2 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/
validator: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
这篇关于建议使用页面顶部链接？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
