OOP [英] OOP
问题描述
嗨伙计们，
我倾向于喜欢C，当然我知道结构
可以在C中用来实现像这样的东西/>
面向对象的设计。而且我更喜欢C部分
因为我认为C ++已经成长为一个可以牺牲可读性的怪物。
但是我想知道，有没有人试图创建一个简单版本的C ++，如果你愿意的话，就是一个C +，它会给C增加几个关键特性和不允许的
事情
喜欢模板，多重继承等等？
谢谢。
ca*********@yahoo.com 说：
嗨伙计们，
我倾向于选择C，当然我知道结构
可以是在C中用来实现类似于面向对象设计的
。而且我更喜欢C部分
因为我认为C ++已经成长为一个可以牺牲可读性的怪物。
但是我想知道，有没有人试图创建一个简单版本的C ++，如果你愿意的话，就是一个C +，它会给C增加几个关键特性和不允许的
喜欢模板，多重继承等？
是的。它永远不会很好。如果那就是你想要的，那么就自己使用C ++和
自律，不要使用你认为妨碍的功能./ b $ b可读性。 （这就是我在C中已经做过的事情。比如说，goto可以说是
并不意味着我需要使用它。）
-
Richard Heathfield< http://www.cpax.org.uk>
电子邮件：-http：// www。 + rjh @
谷歌用户：< http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
Usenet是一个奇怪的放置" - dmr 1999年7月29日
6月30日12：35 * pm，Richard Heathfield< r ... @ see.sig.invalidwrote：
< blockquote class =post_quotes>
是的。它永远不会很好。如果那就是你想要的，那么就自己使用C ++和
自律，不要使用你认为妨碍的功能./ b $ b可读性。 （这就是我在C中已经做过的事情。比如说，goto可以使用
并不意味着我需要使用它。）
你有一个观点。而且我知道我所做的任何事情或者说没有什么可以阻止其他人使用C ++的有问题的功能
甚至是糟糕的好功能。
但是类比可能是C就像一辆汽车，
C ++就像一辆摩托车。使用摩托车和C ++更容易发生事故
。
虽然我是所有车辆的小心驾驶员，但是b $ b和一个仔细的编码器，如果我向雇主说我是C ++程序员，那么他们会把他绑在别人的C ++代码上，那么机会就更高了。
br />
比我说的那样难以理解
a C程序员。
> >>>" CH" == campyhapper< ca ********* @ yahoo.comwrites：
chBut我想知道，有没有人试图创造一种精简版
chversion of C ++，如果你愿意的话就是一个C +，它只会增加几个关键的b / b
chfeatures和不允许像模板，多个
chinheritance之类的东西等等。 ？
C ++的理念是不让你支付语言功能，而不是b
不要使用。使用C ++，但不要使用你不喜欢的功能。
Charlton
-
Charlton Wilbur
cw*****@chromatico.net
Hi folks,
I tend to prefer C, and of course I know that structs
can be used in C to achieve something like
an object-oriented design. And I prefer C in part
because C++ has, I think, grown into a bit of a
monster wherein readability is sacrificed.
But I wonder, has anyone ever tried to create a
sort of lite version of C++, a C+ if you will, that adds
to C just a few key features and disallows things
like templates, multiple inheritance and the like?
Thanks.
ca*********@yahoo.com said:
Hi folks,
I tend to prefer C, and of course I know that structs
can be used in C to achieve something like
an object-oriented design. And I prefer C in part
because C++ has, I think, grown into a bit of a
monster wherein readability is sacrificed.
But I wonder, has anyone ever tried to create a
sort of lite version of C++, a C+ if you will, that adds
to C just a few key features and disallows things
like templates, multiple inheritance and the like?Yes. It never works very well. If that''s what you want, just use C++ and
discipline yourself not to use the features that you think hamper
readability. (That is what I already do in C. The fact that goto, say, is
available does not mean that I am required to use it.)
--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
On Jun 30, 12:35*pm, Richard Heathfield <r...@see.sig.invalidwrote:
Yes. It never works very well. If that''s what you want, just use C++ and
discipline yourself not to use the features that you think hamper
readability. (That is what I already do in C. The fact that goto, say, is
available does not mean that I am required to use it.)You have a point. And I know that nothing I do or say
will stop others from using C++''s problematic features
or even its good features in bad ways.
But an analogy might be that C is like a car,
C++ is like a motorcycle. Accidents happen
more readily with motorcycles and with C++.
And although I''m a careful driver of all vehicles,
and a careful coder, chances are higher that,
if I say to an employer "I''m a C++ programmer"
they will stick me with someone else''s C++ code
that is incomprehensible than if I say I''m
a C programmer.
>>>>"ch" == campyhapper <ca*********@yahoo.comwrites:
chBut I wonder, has anyone ever tried to create a sort of lite
chversion of C++, a C+ if you will, that adds to C just a few key
chfeatures and disallows things like templates, multiple
chinheritance and the like?
C++ has a philosophy of not making you pay for language features you
don''t use. Use C++, but don''t use the features you don''t like.
Charlton
--
Charlton Wilbur
cw*****@chromatico.net
这篇关于OOP的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
