解析器堆栈溢出，程序太复杂eroor C1026 [英] parser stack overflow, program too complex eroor C1026

问题描述

显然，单个头文件具有巨大的

类定义的复杂程度是有限的。我的一个头文件的源是一个

点，它编译并运行正常，直到我再添加一行，然后我b / b
然后得到这个编译器错误：


致命错误C1026：解析器堆栈溢出，程序太复杂

此诊断发生在编译器生成的函数中''void

My_Class :: Dispose（bool）''


这是否发生在其他人身上？有没有办法增加''解析器

stack''？这是一个错误，还是单个类的复杂性有限制？

和/或头文件？


[== P ==]

Apparently there is a limit to how complex a single header file with a huge
class definition in it can be. The source to one of my header files is at a
point that it compiles and runs fine, until I add one more line to it, and I
then get this compiler error:

fatal error C1026: parser stack overflow, program too complex
This diagnostic occurred in the compiler generated function ''void
My_Class::Dispose(bool)''

Has this happened to anyone else? Is there a way to increase the ''parser
stack''? Is this a bug, or is there a limit to complexity for a single class
and/or header file?

[==P==]

推荐答案

Peteroid写道：

Peteroid wrote:

显然单个头文件的复杂程度是有限的
其中的类定义可以。我的一个标题
文件的来源是它编译并运行正常的点，直到我添加一行
，然后我得到这个编译器错误：
这个诊断发生在编译器生成的函数中''无效
My_Class :: Dispose（bool）''

这发生在其他人身上了吗？有没有办法增加
''解析器堆栈''？这是一个错误，还是对单个类和/或头文件的复杂性有限制？

Apparently there is a limit to how complex a single header file with
a huge class definition in it can be. The source to one of my header
files is at a point that it compiles and runs fine, until I add one
more line to it, and I then get this compiler error:

fatal error C1026: parser stack overflow, program too complex
This diagnostic occurred in the compiler generated function ''void
My_Class::Dispose(bool)''

Has this happened to anyone else? Is there a way to increase the
''parser stack''? Is this a bug, or is there a limit to complexity for
a single class and/or header file?

AFIAK，没有办法增加限制，但我从来没有听说过任何人

之前达到这个限制。


这是一个完全内联写的大班吗？ />

-cd

AFIAK, there''s no way to increase the limit, but I''ve never heard of anyone
hitting this limit before.

Is this a large class written entirely inline?

-cd

Peteroid写道：

Peteroid wrote:

是的，它完全符合要求。但是我把它简化为一个非常小的源文件，它独立地引起了问题（参见注释中源文件顶部的说明）...

Yes, it is entirely in-line. But I''ve reduced it down to a pretty
small source file that independently causes problem attached (see
instructions at top of source file in commented NOTE)...

那是一个非常小的复制品好吧！您可能想要联系PSS，或者至少打开一个错误报告
http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/productfeedback

-cd

That''s a pretty small repro alright! You might want to contact PSS, or at
the very least open a bug report at
http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/productfeedback

-cd

已经有bug报告了！呵呵


注意NEWER上传，更精简，绝对象征性（我的其他其他

帖子）...... :)


[== P ==]


Carl Daniel [VC ++ MVP]" < cp ***************************** @ mvps.org.nospam>

写道消息新闻：eC ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl ...

Already have bug reported it! hehe

Note the NEWER upload, even leaner, absolutely symbolic (my other other
post)... :)

[==P==]

"Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP]" <cp*****************************@mvps.org.nospam >
wrote in message news:eC**************@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...

Peteroid写道：

Peteroid wrote:

是的，它是完全符合要求。但是我把它简化为一个非常小的源文件，它独立地引起了问题（参见注释中源文件顶部的说明）...

Yes, it is entirely in-line. But I''ve reduced it down to a pretty
small source file that independently causes problem attached (see
instructions at top of source file in commented NOTE)...

这是一个非常小的repro好吧！你可能想联系PSS，或者至少打开一个错误报告
http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/productfeedback

-cd

That''s a pretty small repro alright! You might want to contact PSS, or at
the very least open a bug report at
http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/productfeedback

-cd

这篇关于解析器堆栈溢出，程序太复杂eroor C1026的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！