为什么< img>标签没有href属性？ [英] Why <img> tag dont have href attribute?
问题描述
在许多网页上看到图像作为链接是很常见的。
作者通过在< atag中放置一个< imgtag来创建它们。
这是额外使用另一个标签。
但是为什么浏览器不支持< imgtag的href属性？
是否随时这出现在W3C？
It is very common to see an image as a link on many web pages.
Authors create them by putting an <imgtag inside a <atag.
This is very much extra use of another tag.
But why browsers dont support href attribute for <imgtag?
Whether at any time this came up at W3C?
推荐答案
biju写道：
biju wrote:
这是很常见的在许多网页上看到图像作为链接。
作者通过在< atag中放置一个< imgtag来创建它们。
这是非常多的使用另一个标签。
It is very common to see an image as a link on many web pages.
Authors create them by putting an <imgtag inside a <atag.
This is very much extra use of another tag.
不，不是。你*可以*在A里面自己拥有一个IMG，但你可以
也有
< a href =" something"> text< ; img src =" blah" alt =" blah"> more text< img
src =" foo" alt =" bar">甚至更多文字< / a>
没有任何理由可以采用其他方式来做同样的事情。
图像是图像，链接是链接。
No it isn''t. You *can* have an IMG by itself inside an A, but you can
also have
<a href="something">text<img src="blah" alt="blah">more text<img
src="foo" alt="bar">and even more text</a>
There isn''t any reason to have another way to do the same thing. An
image is an image, a link is a link.
4月6日，9：54 * pm，Harlan Messinger
< hmessinger.removet ... @ comcast.netwrote：
On Apr 6, 9:54*pm, Harlan Messinger
<hmessinger.removet...@comcast.netwrote:
< a href =" something"> text< img src = "等等" alt =" blah"> more text< img
src =" foo" alt =" bar">甚至更多文字< / a>
<a href="something">text<img src="blah" alt="blah">more text<img
src="foo" alt="bar">and even more text</a>
是的，在这种情况下，我们需要< atag。
但是我在谈论网页的情况我们只看到
只是一个< imgtag而且没有文字内容或任何其他内容
< atag。
喜欢： -
< a href =" some_page.html">< img src =" blah_image.jpg" alt =" blah">< / a>
Yes in that case we need <atag.
But I was talking about the case in lot to web pages where we only see
just a single <imgtag and no text content or any thing else insde a
<atag.
Like:-
<a href="some_page.html"><img src="blah_image.jpg" alt="blah"></a>
biju写道：
biju wrote:
4月6日，9：54 pm，Harlan Messinger
< hmessinger.removet ... @ comcast.netwrote：
On Apr 6, 9:54 pm, Harlan Messinger
<hmessinger.removet...@comcast.netwrote:
>< a href =" something"> text< img src =" blah" alt =" blah"> more text< img
src =" foo" alt =" bar">甚至更多文字< / a>
><a href="something">text<img src="blah" alt="blah">more text<img
src="foo" alt="bar">and even more text</a>
是的，在这种情况下，我们需要< atag。
但我正在谈论网页中的案例我们只看到
只是一个< imgtag而且没有文字内容或任何其他内容
< atag。
喜欢： -
< a href =" some_page.html">< img src =" blah_image.jpg" ALT ="等等">< / A>
Yes in that case we need <atag.
But I was talking about the case in lot to web pages where we only see
just a single <imgtag and no text content or any thing else insde a
<atag.
Like:-
<a href="some_page.html"><img src="blah_image.jpg" alt="blah"></a>
正如我问你：为什么还有另一种方法来做同样的事情？
的事情？保存标签并不完全是圣杯。
As I asked you: why does there have to be another way to do the same
thing? Saving a tag is not exactly the Holy Grail.
这篇关于为什么< img>标签没有href属性？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
