到Borland Builder或Visual Studio [英] To Borland Builder or to Visual Studio

查看:64
本文介绍了到Borland Builder或Visual Studio的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

您好。我想得到一个C ++ IDE,但我不知道是否要使用Bill Gate'的
解决方案或Borland'。任何善良的人都可以详细说明两者的相对强度以及两者的弱点,并告诉我你自己喜欢哪一个。

提前致谢。


Ziggi

解决方案

Ziggi写道:

嗨。我想得到一个C ++ IDE,但我不知道是否要使用Bill Gate的解决方案或Borland的解决方案。任何一个人都可以详细说明两者的相对强度和弱点,并告诉我你自己喜欢哪一个。
提前致谢。

Ziggi



总有第三种选择。

我个人更喜欢Borland,因为我对MS有亲和力。


搜索此新闻组以查找IDE并且你会找到其他人。

为什么要限制自己两个选择?

此外,最终的偏好是你的。我做的就像一个因为它b / b $ b $紫色,这可能对你的决定没有影响。

-

Thomas Matthews

C ++新闻组欢迎辞:
http://www.slack.net/~shiva/welcome.txt

C ++常见问题: http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite

C常见问题: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/c-faq/top。 html

alt.comp.lang.learn.c-c ++ faq:
http://www.raos.demon.uk/acllc-c++/faq.html

其他网站:
http://www.josuttis.com - C ++ STL Library book


Ziggi写道:

嗨。我想要一个C ++ IDE,但我不知道是否要使用Bill
Gate'的解决方案或Borland'。任何善良的人都可以详细说明两者的相对优势和弱点,并告诉我你自己喜欢哪一个。
提前致谢。

Ziggi



我特别喜欢C ++ Builder的是你用

GUI对象编程。可视化组件库(VCL)提供了一个非常好的GUI的抽象概念。


不幸的是,现在不是开始使用C ++ Builder的好时机它的

作为产品的未来目前还不清楚(已经有一段时间了。)


如果你想了解更多,请查看

borland.public.cppbuilder.non- technical


我认为Windows替代Borland和MS可能是Dev-C ++和GTK

或Qt。


如果您想在Linux中工作,那么KDevelop是一个优秀的(并且免费的)用于GUI应用程序的
开发环境。


-

Chris Gordon-Smith

伦敦

主页: http://graffiti.virgin.net/c.gordon-smith/

电子邮件地址:请参阅我的主页


Ziggi写道:

嗨。我想得到一个C ++ IDE,但我不知道是否要使用Bill Gate的解决方案或Borland的解决方案。任何善良的人都可以详细说明两者的相对优势和弱点,并告诉我你自己喜欢哪一个。
提前致谢。



..NET framework是最可行的技术,目前只有VC ++

..NET支持它。此外VC ++ .NET 2003已经成为一个很好的,因为它符合标准,并且有一个RAD(与VB相同的RAD,C#等)!


(2年前我​​会建议使用BC ++,但情况完全不同

现在。)



问候,


Ioannis Vranos


Hi. I want to get a C++ IDE, but I dont know whether to go for Bill Gate''s
solution or Borland''s. Could any kind folks detail the relative strength
and weaknesses of both, and also tell me which you yourselves prefer.
Thanks in advance.

Ziggi

解决方案

Ziggi wrote:

Hi. I want to get a C++ IDE, but I dont know whether to go for Bill Gate''s
solution or Borland''s. Could any kind folks detail the relative strength
and weaknesses of both, and also tell me which you yourselves prefer.
Thanks in advance.

Ziggi



There''s always a third alternative.
I personally perfer Borland because I have an affinity against MS.

Do a search of this newsgroup for "IDE" and you will find the others.
Why limit yourself to two choices?
Also, the ultimate preference is yours. I make like one because it
is purple, which may not have any bearing for your decision.
--
Thomas Matthews

C++ newsgroup welcome message:
http://www.slack.net/~shiva/welcome.txt
C++ Faq: http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite
C Faq: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/c-faq/top.html
alt.comp.lang.learn.c-c++ faq:
http://www.raos.demon.uk/acllc-c++/faq.html
Other sites:
http://www.josuttis.com -- C++ STL Library book


Ziggi wrote:

Hi. I want to get a C++ IDE, but I dont know whether to go for Bill
Gate''s
solution or Borland''s. Could any kind folks detail the relative strength
and weaknesses of both, and also tell me which you yourselves prefer.
Thanks in advance.

Ziggi



What I particularly like about C++ Builder is that you program in terms of
GUI objects. The Visual Component Library (VCL) provides a very good
abstraction of a GUI.

Unfortunately, now is not a good time to start using C++ Builder as its
future as a product is currently unclear (and has been for some time).

If you want to know more have a look in
borland.public.cppbuilder.non-technical

I suppose a Windows alternative to Borland and MS might be Dev-C++ and GTK
or Qt.

If you want to work in Linux, then KDevelop is an excellent (and free)
development environment for GUI applications.

--
Chris Gordon-Smith
London
Homepage: http://graffiti.virgin.net/c.gordon-smith/
Email Address: Please see my Home Page


Ziggi wrote:

Hi. I want to get a C++ IDE, but I dont know whether to go for Bill Gate''s
solution or Borland''s. Could any kind folks detail the relative strength
and weaknesses of both, and also tell me which you yourselves prefer.
Thanks in advance.


..NET framework is the most viable technology and currently only VC++
..NET supports it. Also VC++ .NET 2003 has become a good one since it is
very high standard compliant and has a RAD (the same RAD with VB, C# etc.)!

(2 years ago I would have suggested BC++ but things are quite different
now).


Regards,

Ioannis Vranos


这篇关于到Borland Builder或Visual Studio的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆