Db2 v 8是越野车 [英] Db2 v 8 is buggy
问题描述
这肯定看起来像一个巨魔，但IBM人员应该去那里
并保卫DB2
http：//groups-beta.google.com/group / ... 2708de1c07fd61
"
我们几乎已经准备好放弃DB2 v8并考虑迁移到
Oracle（原因是DB2 v8不稳定）。主要问题是 -
如何正确配置好的稳定的Oracle在OLTP负载很重的情况下
（10M +交易/天）？ DB2 v7可以很好地处理这样的负载，但v8甚至是
w / FP7是一个灾难（实例崩溃以及其他错误），并且
支持的生命周期为v7最后，我们被迫看看
替代品（唯一真正的甲骨文）。
所以 - 有没有人有经验（好的或坏的） ）运行严重
在Oracle上加载OLTP系统？
"
至于那些想知道我为什么这样做的人，问一个印度朋友
你的什么是naarad muni。
rkusenet写道：这肯定看起来像一个巨魔，但IBM人员应该去那里
并保卫DB2
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/ .. .2708de1c07fd61
我们几乎已经准备好放弃DB2 v8并考虑迁移到Oracle（原因是DB2 v8不稳定）。主要问题是 -
如何正确配置Oracle正在进行大量OLTP负载（10M +交易/天）？ DB2 v7可以很好地处理这样的负载，但v8甚至是/ FP7都是一个灾难（实例崩溃以及其他错误），并且支持v7的生命即将结束，我们迫不及待地想看看
替代方案（唯一真正的替代方案）。
那么 - 在Oracle上运行负载很重的OLTP系统有没有经验（好的或坏的）？对于那些想知道我为什么要这样做的人，请问一个印度朋友你的naarad muni是什么。
DB2是否需要防御？
似乎不适合插入Oracle组来捍卫
DB2。如果这个人有DB2问题，他可以转向这个
组。我很好奇导致这种行为的原因（DB2
即:) :)也许是FP< = 7中的错误（我理解FP9是一个不可或缺的原因
因为以前的修补程序中的主要错误。
-R-
-R-
< BLOCKQUOTE>" rkusenet" <我们******* @ gmail.com>在消息中写道
news：3e ************ @ individual.net ...
"
我们''几乎已经准备好放弃DB2 v8并考虑迁移到Oracle（原因是DB2 v8不稳定）。主要问题是 -
如何正确配置Oracle正在进行大量OLTP负载（10M +交易/天）？ DB2 v7可以很好地处理这样的负载，但v8甚至是/ FP7都是一个灾难（实例崩溃以及其他错误），并且支持v7的生命即将结束，我们迫不及待地想看看
替代方案（唯一真正的Oracle）。
FP7是8.2的第一个版本，具有许多新功能。所以我会试试FP9。
" rkusenet" <我们******* @ gmail.com>在消息中写道
新闻：3e ************ @ individual.net ...这看起来像一个巨魔，但IBM人们应该去那里
并保卫DB2
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...2708de1c07fd61
"
这个人试图在Windows 2003上每天运行10M +交易，
这不是最稳定的操作系统。我会切换到Linux或UNIX，这是非常稳定的
。
This sure looks like a troll, but IBM folks should go there
and defend DB2
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...2708de1c07fd61
"
We''re almost ready to give up on DB2 v8 and consider migration to
Oracle (the reason is DB2 v8 being unstable). The main question is -
how good and stable properly configured Oracle is under heavy OLTP load
(10M+ transactions/day)? DB2 v7 handles such loads nicely, but v8 even
w/FP7 is a disaster (instance crashes as well as other errors), and
with supported life of v7 coming to the end, we are pressured to look
for alternatives (with the only real one being Oracle).
So - does anybody has an experience (good or bad) with running heavily
loaded OLTP systems on Oracle?
"
As for those wondering why I am doing this, ask an indian friend of
yours "what is naarad muni".
rkusenet wrote:This sure looks like a troll, but IBM folks should go there
and defend DB2
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...2708de1c07fd61
"
We''re almost ready to give up on DB2 v8 and consider migration to
Oracle (the reason is DB2 v8 being unstable). The main question is -
how good and stable properly configured Oracle is under heavy OLTP load
(10M+ transactions/day)? DB2 v7 handles such loads nicely, but v8 even
w/FP7 is a disaster (instance crashes as well as other errors), and
with supported life of v7 coming to the end, we are pressured to look
for alternatives (with the only real one being Oracle).
So - does anybody has an experience (good or bad) with running heavily
loaded OLTP systems on Oracle?
"
As for those wondering why I am doing this, ask an indian friend of
yours "what is naarad muni".
Does DB2 need defending?
It doesn''t seem appropriate to barge in on an Oracle group to ''defend''
DB2. If this guy has a problem with DB2 he could have turned to this
group. I am curious though to what is causing this behaviour (of DB2
that is :)) perhaps bugs in FP<=7 (I understand FP9 is a nescessity
because of major bugs in previous fixpaks).
-R-
-R-
"rkusenet" <us*******@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3e************@individual.net..."
We''re almost ready to give up on DB2 v8 and consider migration to
Oracle (the reason is DB2 v8 being unstable). The main question is -
how good and stable properly configured Oracle is under heavy OLTP load
(10M+ transactions/day)? DB2 v7 handles such loads nicely, but v8 even
w/FP7 is a disaster (instance crashes as well as other errors), and
with supported life of v7 coming to the end, we are pressured to look
for alternatives (with the only real one being Oracle).
FP7 is the first release of 8.2 with many new features. So I would try FP9.
"rkusenet" <us*******@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3e************@individual.net...This sure looks like a troll, but IBM folks should go there
and defend DB2
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...2708de1c07fd61
"
This person is trying to run 10M+ transactions per day on Windows 2003,
which is not the most stable OS. I would switch to Linux or UNIX, which are
very stable.
这篇关于Db2 v 8是越野车的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
