DB2 v MySql [英] DB2 v MySql
问题描述
你好，
我有一个客户（客户）问过这个问题：为什么我会购买和/ /
使用UDB，当MySql是免费？
我不得不说我被震惊了。我没有使用MySql的经验，所以我是b / b
留下了一些口吃和溅射的东西，并设法拿出一些东西
我听说几年前 - 那里有没有真正的交易
MySql中的安全性。在飞行中交易可能会丢失。
我感觉像是一个笨蛋。
我正准备迎接大火和/或或者告诫，但我仍然会要求：b / b
我和我的客户应该注意的MySql有哪些不足之处
of？有很多人在推动MySql，我不想和任何人发生宗教战争。我只是需要一个体面的答案来询问我被问到的问题。 :)
TIA
Mairhtin
Hello,
I have a client (customer) who asked the question : "Why would I buy and
use UDB, when MySql is free?"
I had to say I was stunned. I have no experience with MySql, so I was
left sort of stammering and sputtering, and managed to pull out something
I heard a couple of years back - that there was no real transaction
safety in MySql. In flight transactions could be lost.
I felt like SUCH a dork.
I''m bracing for a deluge of flames and/or admonitions, but I''m still
going to ask:
What are the deficiencies of MySql that I and my clients should be aware
of? There are loads of people pushing MySql, and I don''t want to get
into a religious war with ANYONE. I just need a decent answer to the
question I was asked. :)
TIA
Mairhtin
推荐答案
Mairhtin O''Feannag写道：
Mairhtin O''Feannag wrote:
我有一个客户（客户）问过这个问题：当MySql空闲时，我为什么要购买和使用UDB？ ;
I have a client (customer) who asked the question : "Why would I buy and
use UDB, when MySql is free?"
如果我被问到这个问题 - 我会从这里开始 - 只是为了熟悉
我自己和那个野兽：
http://www.redbooks.ibm。 com / redbooks / pdfs / sg247093.pdf
Jan M. Nelken
If I was asked this question - I would start from here - just to familiarize
myself with that beast:
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg247093.pdf
Jan M. Nelken
你有什么理由吗？ ''不考虑MySql？例如，如果
系统是任务关键型的，并且相信DB2更具现场测试/稳定性和企业功能丰富，并且来自
IBM超过第三方MySql支持，那么这可能证明
Db2。也许您提供的解决方案可以利用一些DB2
知识/经验。同样，这些都不是一个直言不讳的A优于
B因为......争论，但如果客户有任何商业头脑，他们可能会感谢您的诚实，而且并非所有商业决策都可以纯粹基于技术优势。
此外，这篇文章可能会引起关注：
http://www.devx.com/dbzone/Article/20743/1954?pf=true
Is there a reason why you''re NOT considering MySql? For example, if the
system is mission-critical and the belief is that DB2 is more
field-tested/stable and enterprise-feature-rich, and the support from
IBM exceeds that of third-party MySql support, then this may justify
Db2. Perhaps the solution you offer leverages some DB2
knowledge/experience. Again, none of this is a blunt "A is better than
B because..." argument, but if the customer has any business savvy,
they may appreciate your honesty, and that not all business decisions
can be made purely on technical merit.
Also, this article may be of interest:
http://www.devx.com/dbzone/Article/20743/1954?pf=true
" Mairhtin O''Feannag" < IR ******** @ rocketmail.com>写道：
"Mairhtin O''Feannag" <ir********@rocketmail.com> writes:
我和我的客户应该注意哪些MySql的缺陷是什么？有很多人推动MySql，我不想与任何人进行宗教战争。我只是需要一个体面的答案来回答我被问到的问题。 ：）
What are the deficiencies of MySql that I and my clients should be aware
of? There are loads of people pushing MySql, and I don''t want to get
into a religious war with ANYONE. I just need a decent answer to the
question I was asked. :)
您可能会发现值得查看以下内容：
< http：// sql-info .de / mysql / gotchas.html>
声称MySQL是免费的也是相当愚蠢的。当他们的
价格表另有说明时。 MySQL（tm）肯定_not_ free
当他们的网站< https://derorder.mysql.com/>表示：
MySQL数据库服务器
世界上最受欢迎的开源数据库。快速，稳定，
紧凑。
从
You might find it worthwhile to look at the following:
<http://sql-info.de/mysql/gotchas.html>
It is also rather stupid to claim that "MySQL is free" when their
price sheets declare otherwise. MySQL(tm) is certainly _not_ free
when their web site <https://order.mysql.com/> indicates:
"MySQL Database Server
The world''s most popular open source database. Fast, stable,
compact.
Starting at
开始
这篇关于DB2 v MySql的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
