.NET和OpenSource .... [英] .NET and OpenSource....

查看:127
本文介绍了.NET和OpenSource ....的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

开源是什么?意味着在.NET平台上,而几乎所有的都是非混淆的。代码是开源?就在昨天,我得到了一个加载项,用于

我的.NET Reflector在.cs文件中为我保存了整个反汇编到C#mscorlib

库,我现在在我的计算机上有一个项目

是一天MS中数百人的努力!

我的意思是,我们不能指望图书馆开发人员在

..NET中混淆他们的代码他们的课程给别人。现在,这不仅仅是MS的无意识思维让他在开源中发布了一个强大的平台

? br />
请帮我解决这个问题!

解决方案

HamorSth写道:

请帮我解决这个问题!




开源是一个许可问题。不是反编译问题。


还有C / C ++ / Java / *的反编译器。


-

Helge Jensen

mailto:他********** @ slog.dk

sip:他********* *@slog.dk

- =>塞巴斯蒂安的封面音乐: http://ungdomshus.nu < = -


HamorSth写道:

开源是什么?这意味着在.NET平台上,而几乎所有的都是非混淆的。代码是开源?就在昨天,我得到了一个用于
我的.NET Reflector的加载项。它在.cs文件中为我保存了整个反汇编到C#mscorlib的库,我现在在我的计算机上有一个项目,有一天是MS的数百人的努力!
我的意思是,我们不能指望图书馆开发人员如果要将他们的课程暴露给其他人,就会在他们的.NET中混淆他们的代码。现在,这不仅仅是MS的无意识思维让他在开源中发布了一个像.NET这样强大的平台吗?
请帮我解决这个问题问题!




OpenSource不仅仅是*拥有*源代码。这是一个

许可证,还有一个哲学和营销方法。


你想要什么问题的帮助?解释他们为什么这样做了?


-

- Mitchell Vincent

- 令人费解 - 发票变得简单!

- http://www.k-billing.com


在消息< Ob ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>,HamorSth

< ;公顷****** @ hotmail.com>写道

开源是什么?这意味着在.NET平台上,而几乎所有的都是非混淆的。代码是开源?就在昨天,我得到了一个用于
我的.NET Reflector的加载项。它在.cs文件中为我保存了整个反汇编到C#mscorlib的库,我现在在我的计算机上有一个项目,有一天是MS的数百人的努力!
我的意思是,我们不能指望图书馆开发人员如果要将他们的课程暴露给其他人,就会在他们的.NET中混淆他们的代码。现在,这不仅仅是MS的无意识思维让他在开源中发布了一个像.NET这样强大的平台吗?
请帮我解决这个问题问题!




开源的定义意味着您可以完全访问源代码

代码以供使用和修改(如果需要)。根据定义,混淆代码不能将b $ b归类为开源。


-

Andrew D. Newbould电子邮件: ne********@NOSPAMzadsoft.com


ZAD Software Systems网站: www.zadsoft.com


What does "open source" mean in the .NET platform while almost all
"non-obfuscated" codes are "Open-Source"? Just yesterday i got an add-in for
my ".NET Reflector" which saved the entire disassembled-to-C# "mscorlib"
library for me in .cs files, and i now have a project on my computer that
was one day the efforts of hundreds of people in MS!
I mean, we can''t expect the library developers to obfuscate their code in
..NET if they are to expose their classes to others. Now, isn''t this just the
unconscious mind of MS that has let him into releasing a powerful platform
like .NET in "open-source"?
Please help me on this issue!

解决方案

HamorSth wrote:

Please help me on this issue!



Open Source is a licensing issue. Not a decompilation issue.

There are decompilers for C/C++/Java/* as well.

--
Helge Jensen
mailto:he**********@slog.dk
sip:he**********@slog.dk
-=> Sebastian cover-music: http://ungdomshus.nu <=-


HamorSth wrote:

What does "open source" mean in the .NET platform while almost all
"non-obfuscated" codes are "Open-Source"? Just yesterday i got an add-in for
my ".NET Reflector" which saved the entire disassembled-to-C# "mscorlib"
library for me in .cs files, and i now have a project on my computer that
was one day the efforts of hundreds of people in MS!
I mean, we can''t expect the library developers to obfuscate their code in
.NET if they are to expose their classes to others. Now, isn''t this just the
unconscious mind of MS that has let him into releasing a powerful platform
like .NET in "open-source"?
Please help me on this issue!



OpenSource is a lot more than just *having* the source code. It''s a
license, and furthermore an philosophy and a marketing method.

What issue do you want help with? Explaining why they did it?

--
- Mitchell Vincent
- kBilling - Invoices Made Easy!
- http://www.k-billing.com


In message <Ob**************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>, HamorSth
<ha******@hotmail.com> writes

What does "open source" mean in the .NET platform while almost all
"non-obfuscated" codes are "Open-Source"? Just yesterday i got an add-in for
my ".NET Reflector" which saved the entire disassembled-to-C# "mscorlib"
library for me in .cs files, and i now have a project on my computer that
was one day the efforts of hundreds of people in MS!
I mean, we can''t expect the library developers to obfuscate their code in
.NET if they are to expose their classes to others. Now, isn''t this just the
unconscious mind of MS that has let him into releasing a powerful platform
like .NET in "open-source"?
Please help me on this issue!



The definition of "Open Source" means you have full access to the source
code to use and modify if required. Obfuscated code by definition can''t
be classed as "Open Source".

--
Andrew D. Newbould E-Mail: ne********@NOSPAMzadsoft.com

ZAD Software Systems Web : www.zadsoft.com


这篇关于.NET和OpenSource ....的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆