ASP.NET VS PHP OOP [英] ASP.NET VS PHP OOP
问题描述
我知道有很多人问我PHP5是否完全是OOP，我说不，
但没有人信任我，我也不在乎，因为我没有时间向你解释所有。
但是我从ORACLE找到了这个，所以我决定发布它来证明我说的是什么。 ASP.NET是OOP而不是PHP（尚未）。
http://otn.oracle.com/pub/articles/hull_asp.html
我用php编写80％的项目，所以不要说我是MS ASP爱好者，但是我想说的是我们不得不承认PHP还不够成熟，而且还没有OOP，而且这对程序员来说非常重要，因为它只是
没有意义，这几乎是最后一种还没有OOP的语言。你可以想象一下我们失去了多少程序员吗？
Savut
I know there is a lot o people asking me if PHP5 is fully OOP, I said no,
but nobody trust me and I dont care as I have no time to explain you all.
But I find this from ORACLE and so I decided to post it to prove what I
said. ASP.NET is OOP not PHP (not yet).
http://otn.oracle.com/pub/articles/hull_asp.html
I program 80% of my projects in php, so dont tell me I''m a MS ASP lover, but
what I want to said is we have to admit PHP is not enough mature yet, and
still lack in OOP, and this is so important for programmer, because It just
make not sense that this is almost the last language not yet OOP. Can you
imagine how many programmers we loss just because of it.
Savut
推荐答案
完全无视任何安全措施Savut
< we *** @ hotmail.com>跳出来说：
With total disregard for any kind of safety measures "Savut"
<we***@hotmail.com> leapt forth and uttered:
我用PHP编写80％的项目，所以不要告诉我我是MS的ASP爱好者，但我想说的是我们不得不承认PHP还不够成熟，而且还缺乏OOP，这对程序员来说非常重要，因为这几乎是没有意义的
这几乎是最后一种语言还没有OOP。你能想象我们有多少程序员因此而失去。
I program 80% of my projects in php, so dont tell me I''m a MS
ASP lover, but what I want to said is we have to admit PHP is
not enough mature yet, and still lack in OOP, and this is so
important for programmer, because It just make not sense that
this is almost the last language not yet OOP. Can you imagine
how many programmers we loss just because of it.
我敢于你定义不够OO的东西。实际上*意味着*。*
似乎每当我听到这句话时，它总是归结为b $ b到是的，PHP5可能有对象，类，抽象类，
接口，完整成员变量和方法访问控制，
异常，对象类型提示，正确的对象解除引用，
析构函数和这一切。但它还不合适OO。
那是什么？
" Erm ... erm ......呃......它没有一个FINALLY关键字!!是啊！
多数民众赞成为什么......是的......呃...你不能做
I dare you to define what "not OO enough" actually *means*.
It seems that every time I hear that sentence it always boils down
to "Well yeah, PHP5 may have objects, classes, abstract classes,
interfaces, full member variable and method access control,
exceptions, object type hinting, proper object dereferencing,
destructors and all that. But it''s not proper OO yet."
"Whys that?"
"Erm... erm... erm... it doesn''t have a FINALLY keyword!! Yeah!
Thats why... yeah.... Urm... and you can''t do
string-> length（）;
和东西......"
没有正确的东西。 OO。甚至Smalltalk（
OO语言的父亲）也没有人们认为OO分类所需的一些功能。
-
Phil Roberts | Dork假装很难 http://www.flatnet.net/
string->length();
and stuff..."
There is no such thing as "proper" OO. Even Smalltalk (the daddy of
OO languages) doesn''t have some of the features people regard as
necessary for the OO classification.
--
Phil Roberts | Dork Pretending To Be Hard | http://www.flatnet.net/
" Phil Roberts" < pH值***** @ HOLYflatnetSHIT.net>在消息中写道
news：Xn ************************* @ 216.196.97.132 ...
"Phil Roberts" <ph*****@HOLYflatnetSHIT.net> wrote in message
news:Xn*************************@216.196.97.132...
完全无视任何安全措施Savut
< we *** @ hotmail.com>跳出来说：
With total disregard for any kind of safety measures "Savut"
<we***@hotmail.com> leapt forth and uttered:
我用PHP编写80％的项目，所以不要告诉我我是MS的ASP爱好者，但我想说的是我们不得不承认PHP还不够成熟，而且还缺乏OOP，这对程序员来说非常重要，因为这几乎是没有意义的
这几乎是最后一种语言还没有OOP。你能想象吗？有多少程序员因此而失去了我们。
I program 80% of my projects in php, so dont tell me I''m a MS
ASP lover, but what I want to said is we have to admit PHP is
not enough mature yet, and still lack in OOP, and this is so
important for programmer, because It just make not sense that
this is almost the last language not yet OOP. Can you imagine
how many programmers we loss just because of it.
我敢于你定义不够OO的东西。实际上*意味着*。
似乎每当我听到这句话时，它总是归结为好吧，PHP5可能有对象，类，抽象类，
接口，完整成员变量和方法访问控制，异常，对象类型提示，正确的对象解除引用，析构函数等等。但它还不适合OO。
那是什么意思？
呃......呃......呃......它没有FINALLY关键字!!是的！
这就是为什么......是的......呃...你不能做
I dare you to define what "not OO enough" actually *means*.
It seems that every time I hear that sentence it always boils down
to "Well yeah, PHP5 may have objects, classes, abstract classes,
interfaces, full member variable and method access control,
exceptions, object type hinting, proper object dereferencing,
destructors and all that. But it''s not proper OO yet."
"Whys that?"
"Erm... erm... erm... it doesn''t have a FINALLY keyword!! Yeah!
Thats why... yeah.... Urm... and you can''t do
这篇关于ASP.NET VS PHP OOP的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
