VS ASP.net使用PHP [英] The use of PHP vs ASP.net

问题描述

你们有多少preFER PHP在ASP.net是因为其开源性质的？

How many of you prefer PHP over ASP.net because of its open source nature?

我发现有因为那种谁喜欢分享的人被吸引到语言的基于PHP（因此更可重复使用code）更多的开源项目。我知道的几个开源项目ASP.net的，但他们没有成熟或活动。

I find there are more open source projects based upon PHP (and therefore more reusable code) because the sort of people who like to share are attracted to the language. I'm aware of a few open source ASP.net projects, but they're not as mature or active.

推荐答案

我做ASP.NET开发三年。我开始PHP开发略高于一年前。两者都足以完成只是你在你的面前有任何Web应用程序的任务。在这个时间点上，我preFER PHP ...不是因为它的开源的性质，而是我认为是在其演变的主要区别。

I did ASP.NET development for three years. I started PHP development a little over a year ago. Both are adequate for accomplishing just about any web application task you have in front of you. At this point in time, I prefer PHP...not because of its open source nature but rather what I perceive to be the main difference in their evolution.

PHP是一个特定问题的解决方案;在一开始，拉斯姆斯·勒多夫需要一种方法来维护自己的主页。从我所看到的，PHP已经在很大程度上成长为人们需要特定功能的结果。

PHP was a solution to a particular problem; in the very beginning, Rasmus Lerdorf needed a way to maintain his homepage. From what I see, PHP has largely grown as a result of people needing specific functionality.

在另一方面，ASP.NET被设计成继任者ASP。由于.NET是微软当时的未来愿景的基石，两人结了婚。包括ASP.NET中的每个版本的功能是基于一个团队在Redmond的优先消费要求，同时考虑营销策略。

On the other hand, ASP.NET was designed to be the successor to ASP. Because .NET was the cornerstone of Microsoft's future vision at the time, the two were married. The functionality included in each version of ASP.NET is based upon a team in Redmond prioritizing consumer requests while considering marketing strategy.

其结果是，虽然我认为ASP.NET是一个更一致设计的产品，它没有必要提供的在PHP确实选项的广度。其一是必然的结果，另一方面是企业策划的结果。

As a result, while I think ASP.NET is a more consistently-engineered product, it does not necessary offer the breadth of options that PHP does. One is a result of necessity, the other is the result of corporate planning.

我都喜欢，并计划与两者在未来的发展。现在，我的选择是PHP，但它并不一定是因为它的开源的本质，而只是它的本质。如果源被关闭，明天，我会继续使用PHP。我并不想纠缠于语义，我只是觉得，在这种情况下访问PHP的源 - 或缺乏 - 没有什么比与ASP.NET的是我的preference

I like both and plan on developing with both in the future. Right now, my choice is PHP but it is not necessarily due to its open source nature, but simply its nature. If the source were closed tomorrow, I'd continue to use PHP. I don't mean to quibble over semantics, I just think that in this case access to PHP's source -- or lack thereof -- has little to do with my preference of it over ASP.NET.

这篇关于VS ASP.net使用PHP的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！