ECMA-372正在加入C ++ [英] ECMA-372 is stepping in on C++
问题描述
大家好，
我写信给你，因为我担心ECMA和MS采取的措施
大幅改变ISO的规格C ++。
我收到了来自lois goldthwaite和英国的以下帖子
他们表达了他们对我的担忧。你和C ++同学吗？
程序员对此有什么看法？
从这个地址阅读全文：
http://www.datanom.net/c++/Objection...JTC1_N8037.pdf
PS。我非常希望我不是OT。
-
希尔森/问候
Michael Rasmussen
http://keyserver.veridis.com:11371/ p ... rch = 0xE3E80917
Hi all,
I write to you because I am concerned about the steps taken by ECMA and MS
to substantially change the specifications for ISO-C++.
I have receive the following post from lois goldthwaite and the UK where
they express their concerns which I also have. Do you fellow C++
programmers have an opinion about that?
Read the full text from this address:
http://www.datanom.net/c++/Objection...JTC1_N8037.pdf
PS. I sincerelly hope that I am not OT.
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
http://keyserver.veridis.com:11371/p...rch=0xE3E80917
推荐答案
Michael Rasmussen写道：
Michael Rasmussen wrote:
我写的因为我担心ECMA和MS采取的步骤要大幅改变ISO-C ++的规范。
你到底在哪里得到这个印象？建议的任何内容都不会直接影响ISO-C ++（我认为你的意思是标准C ++语言的b $ b）。
我收到了来自lois goldthwaite和英国的以下帖子，他们表达了我们对此的担忧。你是C ++的同事吗？程序员对此有何看法？
我不是，除了说''活着，让我们活着''。
从这个地址阅读全文：
http://www.datanom.net/c++/Objection ... JTC1_N8037.pdf
我刚刚做了。谢谢你的链接。
PS。我真的希望我不是OT。
I write to you because I am concerned about the steps taken by ECMA and MS
to substantially change the specifications for ISO-C++.
Where in hell did you get this impression? Nothing in the proposed
C++/CLI specification affects directly what ISO-C++ (I assume you mean
the Standard C++ language) is.
I have receive the following post from lois goldthwaite and the UK where
they express their concerns which I also have. Do you fellow C++
programmers have an opinion about that?
I don''t, except to say, ''Live and let live''.
Read the full text from this address:
http://www.datanom.net/c++/Objection...JTC1_N8037.pdf
I just did. Thank you for the link.
PS. I sincerelly hope that I am not OT.
不，你不是。既然你认为（错误地，IMO）某种方式
会影响标准C ++语言，那么你的帖子就是主题。我认为，这是一个膝盖 -
混蛋反应，但它是热门话题。
V
No, you''re not. Since you think (erroneously, IMO) that it somehow
affects the Standard C++ language, your post if topical. It''s a knee-
jerk reaction, I think, but it''s topical.
V
星期五，2006年1月20日22:53:09 +0100，Michael Rasmussen< mi*@miras.org>
写道：
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 22:53:09 +0100, Michael Rasmussen <mi*@miras.org>
wrote:
我写信给你是因为我担心ECMA和MS会采取措施大幅改变ISO-C ++的规格。
我收到了来自lois goldthwaite和英国的以下帖子，他们表达了我们对此的担忧。你是C ++的同事吗？程序员对此有何看法？
从这个地址阅读全文：
http://www.datanom.net/c++/Objection...JTC1_N8037.pdf
我喜欢这个（结束语）：
这篇论文不应该被视为暗示微软有微弱的阴谋或其他任何人篡夺或颠覆
C ++标准。 （...）
哈哈！如果那不是什么，那么它是什么？一旦CLI成为
标准的一部分，那么符合标准的编译器就必须实现它，无论他们喜欢与否。否则，标准
将会分叉，而我认为没有人想要这样。
他们做到了Java;他们做到了XOpen / ODBC;是什么让你觉得
他们不会（试着）去做C ++？
PS。我真的希望我不是OT。
Hi all,
I write to you because I am concerned about the steps taken by ECMA and MS
to substantially change the specifications for ISO-C++.
I have receive the following post from lois goldthwaite and the UK where
they express their concerns which I also have. Do you fellow C++
programmers have an opinion about that?
Read the full text from this address:
http://www.datanom.net/c++/Objection...JTC1_N8037.pdf
I like this (closing statement):
"This paper should not in any way be taken as suggesting that there is
a sinister plot by Microsoft or anyone else to usurp or subvert the
C++ Standard. (...)"
LOL! If that''s not what it is, then what is it? Once CLI is part of
the standard, then standards-conforming compilers will have to
implement it, whether they like it or not. Otherwise, the standard
will fork, and I don''t think anyone wants that.
They did it to Java; they did it to XOpen/ODBC; what makes you think
they won''t (try to) do it to C++?
PS. I sincerelly hope that I am not OT.
不，不是我能看到的。
- < br $> b $ b Bob Hairgrove
没有********** @ Home .com
2006年1月20日星期五23:21:31 +0100，Bob Hairgrove写道：
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:21:31 +0100, Bob Hairgrove wrote:
哈哈！如果那不是什么，那么它是什么？一旦CLI成为
标准的一部分，那么符合标准的编译器就必须实现它，无论他们是否喜欢它。否则，标准会分叉，我不认为有人想要那个。
LOL! If that''s not what it is, then what is it? Once CLI is part of the
standard, then standards-conforming compilers will have to implement it,
whether they like it or not. Otherwise, the standard will fork, and I
don''t think anyone wants that.
嗯，不要把它放到ISO规范中，他们该怎么做
将其作为单独的标准保留，但MS将C ++ / CLI标准称为
C ++。这是我关心的问题！
-
Hilsen /问候
Michael Rasmussen
http://keyserver.veridis.com:11371 / p ... rch = 0xE3E80917
Well, the dont what to put it into the ISO specification, they what to
keep it as a separate standard but MS refers to the C++/CLI standard as
C++. That is my concern!
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
http://keyserver.veridis.com:11371/p...rch=0xE3E80917
这篇关于ECMA-372正在加入C ++的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
