DBMS的优势和劣势 [英] DBMS advantage and disadvantage

查看:92
本文介绍了DBMS的优势和劣势的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

您好,


我的公司想用数据库进行ERP,任何网站讨论DBMS

的优缺点?或者有人在这里发帖参考?

谢谢

Hello,

My company want to use database for ERP, any website to discuss DBMS
advantage and disadvantage ? or someone post to here for references ?
Thanks

推荐答案

leiw写道:
leiw wrote:

您好,


我公司想用数据库进行ERP,任何网站讨论DBMS

的优缺点?或者有人发帖到这里参考?


谢谢
Hello,

My company want to use database for ERP, any website to discuss DBMS
advantage and disadvantage ? or someone post to here for references ?
Thanks



在Oracle小组中,他们会告诉你有关Oracle的信息。

在DB2小组中询问他们会告诉你有关DB2的信息。

在这里询问他们会告诉你有关SQL Server的信息。

并且你无法衡量不同的意见。


没有任何小组会发布任何与他们所知道的不相符的内容。 />
最好。


如果你想获得客观的信息,那就是要求

可以想象的最糟糕的方式。


问题是你要购买哪个ERP系统?对于所有意图

和目的,只有两个供应商...... Oracle和SAP。 Oracle当然会优先支持他们自己的数据库。 SAP在Oracle之上销售他们的大部分系统并不是什么秘密。


我的建议不是你应该跳过Oracle而不做

a对竞争系统的良好评估。但是你应该首先从ERP供应商的决定接近这个



-

Daniel A. Morgan

华盛顿大学
da******@x.washington.edu (替换为x你回答)

As in an Oracle group they''ll tell you about Oracle.
Ask in a DB2 group they''ll tell you about DB2.
Ask here and they''ll tell you about SQL Server.
And there is no way you''ll be able to weigh the varying opinions.

No group is going to post anything that isn''t specific to what they know
best.

If you want objective information this is about the worst way to ask for
it imaginable.

The question is which ERP system are you going to buy? For all intents
and purposes there are only two vendors ... Oracle and SAP. Oracle will,
of course, preferentially support their own database. And it is no
secret that SAP sells most of their systems on top of Oracle.

My recommendation is not that you should jump on Oracle without making
a good evaluation of competing systems. But you should approach this
from the ERP vendor decision first.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
da******@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)


DA Morgan(da******@psoug.org)写道:
DA Morgan (da******@psoug.org) writes:

问题是你打算购买哪种ERP系统?对于所有意图

和目的,只有两个供应商...... Oracle和SAP。 Oracle当然会优先支持他们自己的数据库。 SAP在Oracle之上销售他们的大多数系统并不是什么秘密。
The question is which ERP system are you going to buy? For all intents
and purposes there are only two vendors ... Oracle and SAP. Oracle will,
of course, preferentially support their own database. And it is no
secret that SAP sells most of their systems on top of Oracle.



我为之工作的公司使用的ERP系统似乎来自Oracle的
。基于这种经验,我强烈建议您获得其他的
。我只用它来报告我的工作时间,并且接口为

它吸引了大量时间。有一次,我不得不检查一张发票,那就更糟了!我看到同事必须登记旅行费用,而且我不会羡慕他们。


当然,可能是当地实施的这个站点上的Oracle ERP非常差。但我真的很惊讶甲骨文同意

将它的名字放在这样的废话上。


无论如何,市场上有更多的替代品。 Oracle和

SAP。我相信我只知道三个北欧国家。肯定

世界范围内还有更多。 Oracle和SAP可能是全球市场上唯一能够处理大公司的产品。

A company that I do work for, uses an ERP system which appears to come
from Oracle. And based on that experience, I strongly recommend getting
something else. I only use it to report my hours, and the interface for
it sucks big time. At one point, I had to check an invoice and that was
a whole worse! I see colleagues who have to register travel expenses, and
I don''t envy them.

Of course, it may be that the local implementation of Oracle ERP is
unusually poor at this site. But I''m really surprised that Oracle agrees
to put its name on such crap.

In any case, there are more alternatives on the market than Oracle and
SAP. I believe that I know of three only in the Nordic countries. Surely
there are a lot more world-wide. Oracle and SAP may be the only on the
global market, and that are able to handle major companies.


我的建议不是那样的你应该跳过Oracle,而不是对竞争系统进行良好的评估。但是你应该首先从ERP供应商的决定中接近这个


My recommendation is not that you should jump on Oracle without making
a good evaluation of competing systems. But you should approach this
from the ERP vendor decision first.



是的。首先获得产品。然后决定RDBMS,如果供应商

为您提供选择。但看看他们提供的是什么。如果他们建议您在Access或Paradox上运行他们的系统,那么请寻找一个不同供应商的
。 :-)


-

Erland Sommarskog,SQL Server MVP, es****@sommarskog.se


SQL Server 2005联机丛书
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...ads/books.mspx

SQL Server 2000联机丛书
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinf...ons/books.mspx

Yup. Get the product first. Then decide on the RDBMS, if the vendor
offer you a choice. But take a look at what they offer. If they suggest
that you would run their system on Access or Paradox, look for a
different vendor. :-)

--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, es****@sommarskog.se

Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro...ads/books.mspx
Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinf...ons/books.mspx


Hi Leiw,<无视DA Morgan - 他是你会遇到的反微软最反对的人;

他非常反对SQL Server,因为他非常了解它正在击败

Oracle在Windows和/或
平台上的BI和RDBMS市场中占据优势并成为其中心 - 这是大多数企业的首选平台。


一个地方开始是
http:// www。 microsoft.com/dynamics/na...questions.mspx

您正在谈论的ERP产品集是Microsoft

Dynamics 。


Tony。


-

Tony Rogerson,SQL Server MVP
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/tonyrogerson

[Ramblings]来自SQL顾问的领域]
http://sqlserverfaq.com

[英国SQL用户社区]

" leiw" < no ** @ 000.com在留言中写道

新闻:15 **************************** ********** @ 0000 .com ...
Hi Leiw,

Ignore DA Morgan - he''s the most anti-Microsoft person you will come across;
he is very very anti SQL Server because he knows full well that it''s beating
Oracle up left right and centre in the BI and RDBMS market on the Windows
platform - the platform of choice for most businesses.

A place to start to is
http://www.microsoft.com/dynamics/na...questions.mspx

The Microsoft product set you are talking about for ERP is Microsoft
Dynamics.

Tony.

--
Tony Rogerson, SQL Server MVP
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/tonyrogerson
[Ramblings from the field from a SQL consultant]
http://sqlserverfaq.com
[UK SQL User Community]
"leiw" <no**@000.comwrote in message
news:15**************************************@0000 .com...

您好,


我的公司想要使用数据库进行ERP,任何网站讨论DBMS

的优缺点?或者有人发帖到这里参考?


谢谢
Hello,

My company want to use database for ERP, any website to discuss DBMS
advantage and disadvantage ? or someone post to here for references ?
Thanks


这篇关于DBMS的优势和劣势的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆