元素和节点是IE领域的二等公民 [英] Element and Node are second class citizens in IE land
问题描述
在FF中你可以定义以下内容......
Element.prototype.getClass = function（）{return this.className; / *或
无论* /}
Element.prototype.setClass = function（c）{this.className = c; }
但它在IE中不起作用。
基本上在IE中，元素和节点是第二类对象，没有
原型行为，与对象，数字和朋友不同。
糟糕的微软！
问候，
Aaron
In FF you can define the following ...
Element.prototype.getClass = function() { return this.className; /* or
whatever */ }
Element.prototype.setClass = function(c) { this.className = c; }
But it don''t work in IE.
Basically in IE land Element and Node are second class objects with no
prototypical behaviour, unlike Object, Number, and friends.
Bad Microsoft !
Regards,
Aaron
推荐答案
Aaron Gray写道：
Aaron Gray wrote:
在FF中你可以定义以下内容......
Element.prototype.getClass = function（）{return this.className; / *
或其他* /}
Element.prototype.setClass = function（c）{this.className = c; }
但它在IE中不起作用。
基本上在IE中，元素和节点是第二类对象，没有
原型行为，与对象，数字和朋友不同。
糟糕的微软！
In FF you can define the following ...
Element.prototype.getClass = function() { return this.className; /*
or whatever */ }
Element.prototype.setClass = function(c) { this.className = c; }
But it don''t work in IE.
Basically in IE land Element and Node are second class objects with no
prototypical behaviour, unlike Object, Number, and friends.
Bad Microsoft !
没有标准说W3C DOM定义的接口应该暴露构造函数和/或原型
（实际上可以很容易地认为
接口不应该有构造函数和/或原型。）
Richard。
No standard says that constructors and/or prototypes should be exposed
for W3C DOM defined interfaces (indeed it could easily be argued that
interfaces should not have constructors and/or prototypes).
Richard.
Richard Cornford < Ri ***** @ litotes.demon.co.ukwrote in message
news：g5 ******************* @ news .demon.co.uk ...
"Richard Cornford" <Ri*****@litotes.demon.co.ukwrote in message
news:g5*******************@news.demon.co.uk...
Aaron Gray写道：
Aaron Gray wrote:
>在FF你可以定义以下内容......
Element.prototype.getClass = function（）{return this.className; / *或
无论什么* /}
Element.prototype.setClass = function（c）{this.className = c;但是它不能在IE中工作。
基本上在IE中，元素和节点是没有原型行为的第二类对象，与Object不同，数量和朋友。
糟糕的微软！
>In FF you can define the following ...
Element.prototype.getClass = function() { return this.className; /* or
whatever */ }
Element.prototype.setClass = function(c) { this.className = c; }
But it don''t work in IE.
Basically in IE land Element and Node are second class objects with no
prototypical behaviour, unlike Object, Number, and friends.
Bad Microsoft !
没有标准说构造函数和/或原型应该暴露给
W3C DOM定义的接口（实际上可以很容易地认为
接口不应该有构造函数和/或原型）。
No standard says that constructors and/or prototypes should be exposed for
W3C DOM defined interfaces (indeed it could easily be argued that
interfaces should not have constructors and/or prototypes).
我的编程学校说你不应该设置障碍，而不需要b / b
，你只需要剥夺程序员和高级用户的权力。 />
Aaron
My school of programming says you should not put up barriers where none are
needed, you just disempower programmers and power users.
Aaron
7月12日下午5:49，Aaron Gray < ang.use ... @ gmail.comwrote：
On Jul 12, 5:49 pm, "Aaron Gray" <ang.use...@gmail.comwrote:
在FF中你可以定义以下内容......
Element.prototype.getClass = function（）{return this.className; / *或
无论* /}
Element.prototype.setClass = function（c）{this.className = c; }
但它在IE中不起作用。
基本上在IE中，元素和节点是第二类对象，没有
原型行为，与对象，数字和朋友不同。
糟糕的微软！
In FF you can define the following ...
Element.prototype.getClass = function() { return this.className; /* or
whatever */ }
Element.prototype.setClass = function(c) { this.className = c; }
But it don''t work in IE.
Basically in IE land Element and Node are second class objects with no
prototypical behaviour, unlike Object, Number, and friends.
Bad Microsoft !
如果您阅读ECMAScript标准，您将看到Host Objects
的行为与Native Objects的行为非常不同。
彼得
If you read the ECMAScript standard, you will see that Host Objects
can behave very differently than Native Objects.
Peter
这篇关于元素和节点是IE领域的二等公民的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
