早上用Python [英] morning in Python

查看:59
本文介绍了早上用Python的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我想和新闻组谈谈。正如我发现它的读者将会非常专注,我认为这是一个值得的制作,

的细分价值和价值。而。 (免责声明:不要打电话给我/ b $ b $百万富翁;生活和金钱......)。目前尚不清楚我是否会在第一件事情上发布代码,因为我有一系列的价值观。(是的,我已经将b / b
解决了以前的身份分散和贡献。)


有可能我只想写,在这种情况下,照片。上面的

,我可能只想写一些消息,显然不知道

谁回复。我的名字仍然像castironpi一样,因为我只是没有b $ b有电子邮件。但是,对于情节,我不知道谁在阅读

名字。如果那让我成为一个villian,那没关系,神秘感很好。


我已经评价过* my * character,ladies&先生们,之前。我只是知道这个伎俩,这可能源于晚上的老故事和

天。


首先,我试图代表故事情节,这涉及到计算机建模智能的一些非平凡的自动化。它

也涉及到现场人员。你可能正在读书。我不是。


根据我的计划,需要一秒时间才能推断出我正在新闻组中生成新闻组一些净化的角色。入场时我的角色会有一些

的后果。这也使获得Python的问题变得复杂化,将我与社区的更大部分连接起来。我在电脑上玩游戏。我已经尝试了

Pygame。


我有一个问题要求大家:Python强调状态。是吗?

是真的吗?

I want to talk to the newsgroup. As I have found that its readers
will be non-trivially attentive, I esteem it a worthwhile production,
for finely divided values of worth & while. (Disclaimer: Don''t call
me millionaire; life & money...). It is not clear that I will be
posting code first thing, for a range of values of I. (Yes I have
tackled decentralization and contribution in identity before.)

It''s possible that I just like to write, in which case, fol. the
foregoing, I might just like to write messages, plainly ignorant of
who replies. My name still works as castironpi, since I just don''t
have e-mail. For the plot, though, I do not know who''s reading by
name. If that makes me a villian, that''s ok, mysteries are good.

I''ve evaluated *my* character, ladies & gentlemen, before. I just
know the trick, which may originate in the older stories of night and
day.

First things first, I try to represent story lines, which involves
some non-trivial automation of computer-modeled intelligence. It
involves live people too. You might be reading. I''m not.

From what plans I come with, it takes a second to infer that I''m on
the newsgroup, which generates some purified roles. This has some
consequences for my character upon entrance. It also complicates the
matter of getting to Python, connecting me with a larger fraction of
the community. I am on a computer and have made games. I''ve tried
Pygame.

I have a proposition to ask you all: Python emphasizes state. Is it
true?

推荐答案

我不是这方面的专家,但它是什么意味着强调国家?它似乎与a b $ b相反的是a)函数式编程,以及b)

传递参数而不是使用全局或相对局部变量。

也许c)coroutines(用Python实现的生成器),虽然

也许coroutines可以说是强调状态,因为它们出去了b / b
的捕获方式,客观化和重复使用它(Stackless''microothreads,

甚至更多)。 Python似乎以实现一些功能性编程方法而闻名,而且对于传递参数,它只是

作为面向对象的其余部分。


但正如我所说,我不是专家,如果我误入歧途,请告诉我。

I''m not an expert in this but what does it mean to emphasize state? It
seems the opposite of that would be a) functional programming, and b)
passing parameters instead of using global or relatively local variables.
And maybe c) coroutines (generators as implemented in Python), although
perhaps coroutines could be said to emphasize state inasmuch as they go out
of their way to capture, objectify and reuse it (Stackless'' microthreads,
even moreso). And Python seems to be well-noted for implementing some
functional programming methodology, and as for passing parameters it''s just
as object-oriented as the rest of them.

But as I said, I''m not an expert, so let me know if I''ve gone astray..


我有一个问题要求大家:Python强调状态。是吗?

是真的吗?
I have a proposition to ask you all: Python emphasizes state. Is it
true?



5月16日,11:58 * am,吸收 < inh ... @ gmail.comwrote:
On May 16, 11:58*am, "inhahe" <inh...@gmail.comwrote:

我不是这方面的专家,但强调国家意味着什么? *它b / b似乎与a相反的是a)函数式编程,和b)

传递参数而不是使用全局或相对局部变量。

并且可能是c)coroutines(用Python实现的生成器),虽然

也许coroutines可以说是强调状态因为它们出去

他们的方式来捕获,客观化和重复使用它(Stackless''microothreads,

甚至更多)。 *并且Python似乎以实现一些

函数式编程方法而闻名,并且至于传递参数它只是

作为面向对象的其余部分他们。


但正如我所说,我不是专家,所以如果我误入歧途,请告诉我。
I''m not an expert in this but what does it mean to emphasize state? *It
seems the opposite of that would be a) functional programming, and b)
passing parameters instead of using global or relatively local variables.
And maybe c) coroutines (generators as implemented in Python), although
perhaps coroutines could be said to emphasize state inasmuch as they go out
of their way to capture, objectify and reuse it (Stackless'' microthreads,
even moreso). *And Python seems to be well-noted for implementing some
functional programming methodology, and as for passing parameters it''s just
as object-oriented as the rest of them.

But as I said, I''m not an expert, so let me know if I''ve gone astray..

我有一个主张要问你们所有人:Python强调国家。 *是吗?b $ b是真的吗?
I have a proposition to ask you all: Python emphasizes state. *Is it
true?



请不要给机器人喂食。

Please don''t feed the bots.




" George Sakkis" < ge *********** @ gmail.comwrote in message

news:19 ******************* *************** @ m3g2000h sc.googlegroups.com ...

5月16日上午11点58分,吸入 < inh ... @ gmail.comwrote:

"George Sakkis" <ge***********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:19**********************************@m3g2000h sc.googlegroups.com...
On May 16, 11:58 am, "inhahe" <inh...@gmail.comwrote:

我不是这方面的专家,但强调国家意味着什么?它似乎与a b $ b相反的是a)函数式编程,以及b)

传递参数而不是使用全局或相对局部变量。

也许c)coroutines(用Python实现的生成器),虽然

也许coroutines可以说是强调状态因为它们去了

out

他们捕捉,客观化和重复使用它的方式(Stackless''microthreads,

甚至更多)。并且Python似乎以实现一些

函数式编程方法而闻名,并且对于传递参数它只是

as

as面向对象就像其他人一样。


但正如我所说,我不是专家,所以如果我误入歧途,请告诉我。
I''m not an expert in this but what does it mean to emphasize state? It
seems the opposite of that would be a) functional programming, and b)
passing parameters instead of using global or relatively local variables.
And maybe c) coroutines (generators as implemented in Python), although
perhaps coroutines could be said to emphasize state inasmuch as they go
out
of their way to capture, objectify and reuse it (Stackless'' microthreads,
even moreso). And Python seems to be well-noted for implementing some
functional programming methodology, and as for passing parameters it''s
just
as object-oriented as the rest of them.

But as I said, I''m not an expert, so let me know if I''ve gone astray..

我有一个问题要求大家:Python强调状态。是吗?b $ b是真的吗?
I have a proposition to ask you all: Python emphasizes state. Is it
true?



请不要给机器人喂食。


-

我认为这个问题很有意思,值得讨论是否它是一个机器人。但我不是一个狂热的论坛用户,所以也许我错了。


另外,如果它是一个机器人我很慌张而且是那个写它的人可能会用五行asm解决癌症和世界饥饿问题。

Please don''t feed the bots.

--
I figured the question was interesting enough to warrant discussion whether
it was a bot or not. But i''m not an avid forum user, so maybe I''m wrong.

Also, if it''s a bot I''m floored and the man who wrote it could probably
solve cancer and world hunger with five lines of asm.


这篇关于早上用Python的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆