带有所见即所得的HTML编辑器&手动HTML编辑 [英] HTML Editor with WYSIWYG & Manual HTML Editing
问题描述
我使用MS Word作为HTML编辑器的经历很糟糕。它b
膨胀超过200％所以我几乎无法识别必要的
陈述;它引入了超过14,000个错误。此外，虽然它在Firefox中表现良好，但它对IE来说是难以理解的。那天我花了
试图将错误减少到HTML Tidy
可以在没有中止的情况下完成传递。最后我成功了。没有
错误。它在Firefox和Firefox中显示得很好IE。
但我的问题是，我现在可以为编辑器使用什么？我希望能够使用MS Word轻松插入表行和列，但是我希望
不需要错误，我想要一个HTML代码仍然可以自己修改
。你能推荐什么？
非常感谢。
Trish
Trish写道：
我使用MS Word作为HTML编辑器的经历很糟糕。
不出意外。我已经读过四个最差的HTML''编辑'了：
4. Microsoft FrontPage
3. Microsoft Word
2. Microsoft Excel
1. Microsoft Publisher
它臃肿超过200％所以我几乎无法识别必要的
语句;它引入了超过14,000个错误。
哇！这必须是一个新世界的记录！
此外，虽然它在Firefox中显示得很好，但却无法理解
IE 。
......但这种情况很少见。通常情况下，IE可以理解，并且所有真正的浏览器都会搞砸那里的所有MS膨胀。
我花了一天时间试图将错误减少到HTML的位置
Tidy可以在不中止的情况下完成传球。最后我成功了。没有
错误。它在Firefox和Firefox中显示得很好IE浏览器。
时间永远无法恢复。
但是，我的问题是，我可以为编辑器使用什么现在？
我喜欢（适用于Windows）Crimson Editor ......但就是这样，一个
*编辑*，而不是一个字处理器或代码生成器。它也是您网站的优秀项目经理。
http： //crimsoneditor.com/
然后我再次手工编写代码。
我'' d喜欢能够轻松地插入表行和列
MS Word，但我希望没有错误，我想要一个HTML代码，我可以
仍然可以修改我。你能推荐什么？
尝试Kompozer，这是NVu的持续发展。
http://kompozer.sourceforge.net/
但请记住，没有WYSIWYMG''编辑''产生错误 - 免费
代码。
-
-bts
-Motorcycles无视重力;汽车只是吮吸
Beauregard T. Shagnasty写道：
Trish写道：
>我使用MS Word作为HTML编辑器的经历很糟糕。
不出意外。我已经读过四个最差的HTML''编辑'了：
4. Microsoft FrontPage
3. Microsoft Word
2. Microsoft Excel
1. Microsoft Publisher
>它膨胀超过200％所以我几乎认不出必要
声明;它引入了超过14,000个错误。
哇！这必须是一个新的世界的记录！
我不知道如何为一个有两个段落的网站557 KB和
一个17 KB的背景图片！我认为我的MS Publisher Web Guru再次使用新网站获得
...
http://www.eclipseibizans.com/
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbos...ibizans.com%2F
http://www.eclipseibizans.com/ 的结果 - W3C标记验证器
不是14,000，但807错误是一个非常大的数字。
-
小心，
Jonathan
-------------------
小工作室
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Jonathan N. Little写道：
Beauregard T. Shagnasty写道：
>哇！这必须是一个新世界的记录！
我不知道557 KB的网站有两个段落和
一个17 KB的背景图片！我认为我的MS Publisher Web Guru在一个新的网站上又是
...
http://www.eclipseibizans.com/
哦。我的。 & deity ;.
如果有一个例子说明为什么Publisher是
列表中的第1号，那就是。虽然我将不得不给她一些*功劳：在
至少这个实际上在Firefox或Opera中显示的内容...
运行她的摄影"通过Web Optimizer页面。超过4兆字节
一些未优化的图形。
这个女人需要一个家庭电话。
-
-bts
-Motorcycles无视重力;汽车只是吮吸
I just had a bad experience using MS Word as an HTML editor. It
bloated more than 200% so I could barely recognize the essential
statements; and it introduced more than 14,000 errors. Also, although
it displayed fine in Firefox, it was unintelligible to IE. I spent
the day trying to reduce the errors to the point wherel HTML Tidy
could finish a pass without aborting. Finally I succeeded. No
errors. It displays fine in Firefox & IE.
BUT, my question is, what can I use for an editor now? I''d like to be
able to insert table rows and columns with the ease of MS Word, but I
want no errors and I want an HTML code that I can still modify
myself. What can you recommend?
Thanks a lot.
Trish
Trish wrote:
I just had a bad experience using MS Word as an HTML editor.No surprise there. I''ve read where the four worst HTML ''editors'' are:
4. Microsoft FrontPage
3. Microsoft Word
2. Microsoft Excel
1. Microsoft Publisher
It bloated more than 200% so I could barely recognize the essential
statements; and it introduced more than 14,000 errors.Wow! That has to be a new world''s record!
Also, although it displayed fine in Firefox, it was unintelligible to
IE....but that is rare. Normally, IE can comprehend, and all real browsers
screw up with all the MS bloat in there.
I spent the day trying to reduce the errors to the point wherel HTML
Tidy could finish a pass without aborting. Finally I succeeded. No
errors. It displays fine in Firefox & IE.Time is never recoverable.
BUT, my question is, what can I use for an editor now?I like (for Windows) Crimson Editor ... but that is what it is, an
*editor*, not a word processor or code generator. It is also an
excellent project manager for your sites.
http://crimsoneditor.com/
Then again, I write code by hand.
I''d like to be able to insert table rows and columns with the ease of
MS Word, but I want no errors and I want an HTML code that I can
still modify myself. What can you recommend?Try Kompozer, which is the continuing development of NVu.
http://kompozer.sourceforge.net/
but remember, there are no WYSIWYMG ''editors'' that generate error-free
code.
--
-bts
-Motorcycles defy gravity; cars just suck
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:Trish wrote:
>I just had a bad experience using MS Word as an HTML editor.
No surprise there. I''ve read where the four worst HTML ''editors'' are:
4. Microsoft FrontPage
3. Microsoft Word
2. Microsoft Excel
1. Microsoft Publisher
>It bloated more than 200% so I could barely recognize the essential
statements; and it introduced more than 14,000 errors.
Wow! That has to be a new world''s record!
I don''t know how about 557 KB for a site with two sort paragraphs and
one 17 KB background image! I think my "MS Publisher Web Guru" is at it
again with a new site...
http://www.eclipseibizans.com/
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbos...ibizans.com%2F
Result for http://www.eclipseibizans.com/ - W3C Markup Validator
Not quite 14,000 but 807 errors is a pretty large number.
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:>Wow! That has to be a new world''s record!
I don''t know how about 557 KB for a site with two sort paragraphs and
one 17 KB background image! I think my "MS Publisher Web Guru" is at
it again with a new site...
http://www.eclipseibizans.com/Oh. My. &deity;.
If ever there was an example as to why Publisher is Number 1 on the
list, there it is. Though I will have to give her *some* credit: at
least this one actually displays something in Firefox or Opera...
Run her "Photography" page through the Web Optimizer. Over 4 Megabytes
for a few un-optimized graphics.
This woman needs a house call.
--
-bts
-Motorcycles defy gravity; cars just suck
这篇关于带有所见即所得的HTML编辑器&手动HTML编辑的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
