如果...会更容易阅读 [英] would C be easier to read if...
问题描述
一些语法并没有太多超载...
如果指针取消引用和指向类型的指针只是在思考
单独的语法（即对其中一个使用''*'之外的字符）它会使得b / b $ b更容易阅读。你不会得到这样的东西：
pthread_create（& thread，NULL，（void *（*）（void *））ThreadProc，（void
*）参数）;
some of the syntax wasn''t overloaded so much...
Was just musing that if pointer de-referencing and pointer-to-type had
seperate syntax (ie use a character other than ''*'' for one of them) it would
make things much easier to read. You wouldn''t get stuff like:
pthread_create(&thread, NULL, (void *(*)(void*))ThreadProc, (void
*)parameter);
推荐答案
Robert Smith写道：
Robert Smith wrote:
一些语法并没有太多超载...
如果指针取消引用和指向类型指针那么只是在思考
单独的语法（即对其中一个使用''*'以外的字符）它会使得b / b $ b更容易阅读。你不会得到这样的东西：
pthread_create（& thread，NULL，（void *（*）（void *））ThreadProc，（void
*）参数）;
some of the syntax wasn''t overloaded so much...
Was just musing that if pointer de-referencing and pointer-to-type had
seperate syntax (ie use a character other than ''*'' for one of them) it would
make things much easier to read. You wouldn''t get stuff like:
pthread_create(&thread, NULL, (void *(*)(void*))ThreadProc, (void
*)parameter);
肯定要么'ThreadProc`已经是正确的类型，在这种情况下
演员可以而且应该被丢弃，或者它不是'不，在这种情况下
演员阵容是一个等待显示的bug，而'ThreadProc`应该是
固定。
是吗？
-
我徒劳无功。它不会这样做。 /傲慢与偏见/
Hewlett-Packard Limited Cain Road，Bracknell，注册号：
注册办事处：Berks RG12 1HN 690597 England
Surely either `ThreadProc` is already the right type, in which case
the cast can and should be discarded, or it isn''t, in which case
the cast is a bug waiting to manifest and `ThreadProc` should be
fixed.
Yes?
--
"In vain I have struggled. It will not do." /Pride and Prejudice/
Hewlett-Packard Limited Cain Road, Bracknell, registered no:
registered office: Berks RG12 1HN 690597 England
Chris Dollin写道：
Chris Dollin writes:
> Robert Smith写道：
>Robert Smith wrote:
> pthread_create（& thread，NULL，（void *（*）（void *））ThreadProc，（void
*）参数）;
>pthread_create(&thread, NULL, (void *(*)(void*))ThreadProc, (void
*)parameter);
肯定要么'ThreadProc`已经是正确的类型，在这种情况下
演员可以而且应该被丢弃，或者它不是'不，在这种情况下
演员阵容是一个等待显示的bug，而'ThreadProc`应该是
固定。
是？
Surely either `ThreadProc` is already the right type, in which case
the cast can and should be discarded, or it isn''t, in which case
the cast is a bug waiting to manifest and `ThreadProc` should be
fixed.
Yes?
希望''参数''是一个非常量指针，所以void * cast
也可以删除。
你需要用不可读的
类型转换来填充代码的时间，键入dede违规类型可能是有意义的。
-
Hallvard
And hopefully ''parameter'' is a non-const pointer so the void* cast
can be dropped too.
The times where you do need to clutter the code with unreadable
type casts, it may make sense to typedef the offending type.
--
Hallvard
" Robert Smith" < so ***** @ somewhere.comwrites：
"Robert Smith" <so*****@somewhere.comwrites:
一些语法没有超载这么多......
只是沉思，如果指针取消引用和指向类型的指针具有单独的语法（即对其中一个使用*之外的字符），它会
使事情更容易阅读。你不会得到这样的东西：
pthread_create（& thread，NULL，（void *（*）（void *））ThreadProc，（void
*）参数）;
some of the syntax wasn''t overloaded so much...
Was just musing that if pointer de-referencing and pointer-to-type had
seperate syntax (ie use a character other than ''*'' for one of them) it would
make things much easier to read. You wouldn''t get stuff like:
pthread_create(&thread, NULL, (void *(*)(void*))ThreadProc, (void
*)parameter);
所有* s都有相同的含义，不是吗？如何更改符号帮助
？
-
Ben。
All the *s there have the same meaning, don''t they? How would
changing the symbol help?
--
Ben.
这篇关于如果...会更容易阅读的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
