好的进修网站 [英] Good refresher site
问题描述
我曾经在大约10年前用C编码，但是因为
而没有做任何事情。什么是那些每天编码
且需要回到C的人最好的复习网站？
干杯，
TF
I used to code in C about 10 years ago but haven''t done anything since
than. What''s the best refresher site out there for someone who codes
daily and needs to get back into C?
Cheers,
TF
推荐答案
3月12日下午3:50，gjr ... @ googlemail.com写道：
On Mar 12, 3:50 pm, gjr...@googlemail.com wrote:
我曾经在大约10年前用C编码但是因为
而没有做任何事情。对于那些每天编码
且需要回到C的人来说，最好的复习网站是什么？
I used to code in C about 10 years ago but haven''t done anything since
than. What''s the best refresher site out there for someone who codes
daily and needs to get back into C?
我通常只需要一本好的参考书来回答问题
。 K& R2一般被认为是好的，但在线我也会使用：
一个相当有用的C库参考：
http://www.acm.uiuc.edu/webmonkeys/book/c_guide/
和comp.lang.c常见问题解答：
http://c-faq.com/
I usually just need a good reference book in order to answer questions
as they come up. K&R2 is generally thought to be good, but online I
also use:
A reasonably useful C library reference:
http://www.acm.uiuc.edu/webmonkeys/book/c_guide/
And the comp.lang.c FAQ:
http://c-faq.com/
bluejack写道，2007年12月12日23： 27：
bluejack wrote, On 12/03/07 23:27:
3月12日下午3:50，gjr ... @ googlemail.com写道：
On Mar 12, 3:50 pm, gjr...@googlemail.com wrote:
>我以前在大约10年前用C编码，但是因为
而没有做任何事情。对于那些每天编码并且需要重新进入C的人来说，最好的复习网站是什么？
>I used to code in C about 10 years ago but haven''t done anything since
than. What''s the best refresher site out there for someone who codes
daily and needs to get back into C?
我通常只需要一本好的参考书来回答问题
。 K& R2一般被认为是好的，但在线我
也使用：
I usually just need a good reference book in order to answer questions
as they come up. K&R2 is generally thought to be good, but online I
also use:
K& R2很好。
K&R2 is good.
一个相当有用的C库参考：
http://www.acm.uiuc.edu/webmonkeys/book/c_guide/
基于快速查看我是''我不相信，但它可能解释了我们看到的可怕术语的一些原因。例如，它讨论了类型转换。
事实上，看起来有点进一步看起来似乎充满了错误。
至少其中一些是相当基本的我的看法。例如：
|枚举标识符{enumerator-list};
|标识符是识别的句柄，是可选的。
| Enumerator-list是要创建的变量列表。他们将是
|常数整数。每个变量都赋予前一个
|的值变量加1.第一个变量的值为0
我无法想象任何可以认为枚举的方式
变量。它还使用变量一词。各种其他的
有问题的方法。
Based on a quick look I''m not convinced, however it might explain some
of the horrible terminology we see. For example, it talks about typecasting.
In fact, having looked a bit further it seems riddled with errors at
least some of which are fairly fundamental in my opinion. For example:
| enum identifier {enumerator-list};
| Identifier is a handle for identification, and is optional.
| Enumerator-list is a list of variables to be created. They will be
| constant integers. Each variable is given the value of the previous
| variable plus 1. The first variable is given the value of 0
I cannot imagine any way that the enumerations can be considered
variables. It also uses the word "variables" in various other
questionable ways.
和comp.lang.c常见问题：
http://c-faq.com/
这是件好事参考。
-
Flash Gordon
That is a good reference.
--
Flash Gordon
3月12日下午5:58，Flash Gordon< s ... @ flash-gordon.me.ukwrote：
On Mar 12, 5:58 pm, Flash Gordon <s...@flash-gordon.me.ukwrote:
bluejack写道，2007年12月12日23:27：
bluejack wrote, On 12/03/07 23:27:
一个相当有用的C库参考：
http://www.acm.uiuc.edu/webmonkeys/book/c_guide/
基于快速浏览我不相信，但是它可能解释了我们看到的可怕术语的一些原因。
Based on a quick look I''m not convinced, however it might explain some
of the horrible terminology we see.
好吧......也许是一个合理的*糟糕的*参考。 :)当我需要
找到执行X的调用时，我会使用它。 （我不会把所有这些东西都存放在本地
内存中。）如果你知道更好的参考资料，那么
请分享！
-b
Ok... maybe a reasonably *bad* reference. :) I use it when I need to
find "the call that does X". (I don''t store all that stuff in local
memory.) If you know of a better reference for that sort of thing,
please share!
-b
这篇关于好的进修网站的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
