新闻:亚马逊使用Java / C ++进入Web服务 [英] News: Amazon moves into web services using Java/C++

查看:62
本文介绍了新闻:亚马逊使用Java / C ++进入Web服务的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

来自网络服务方面的大新闻。亚马逊将使用网络服务将b
捆绑在一起。实现该系统的公司将使用Java / C ++(稍后迁移到所有java)。


微软是如何花这么多的非常吹嘘.NET for web

服务,J2EE实际上占据了更大的份额?

http://www.internetnews.com/ec-news/article.php/3077221

解决方案

在comp.lang.java.advocacy asj< ka ******* @ yahoo.com>写道:


:微软花了多少时间来讨论.NET for web

:服务,并且J2EE实际上正在采取更大的切片,这不是很有趣吗饼干?


在微软介入之前,网络服务是IBM的宝贝。

-

__________

| im | yler http://timtyler.org/ ti*@tt1.org


实际上非常有趣。

MS必须进入一个java已经开始7年的市场。我们都知道,在台式机上人们已经使用了多年来最好的产品,但是在服务器,SUN等保守市场上,人们已经说服了人们

他们需要一台昂贵的大型服务器来弥补Java等环境中性能不足的影响。证明他们错了可能需要很长时间才能非常努力,因为当你陷入SUN手中时,你希望被抢劫。作为一个步骤,直到人们完全理解他们自己的好b / b,MS让世界其他地方可以使用

旧通过迫使SUN放弃他们非标准的做事方式来实现Java和昂贵的Java技术。现在人们可以看到.NET中的exaktly同样的东西

的速度是原来的3倍,构建起来要容易10倍,但价格却低得多。


" asj" < KA ******* @ yahoo.com>在消息中写道

news:38 ************************** @ posting.google.c om ...

来自网络服务前端的大新闻。亚马逊将使用网络服务将所有供应商捆绑在一起。实现该系统的公司将使用Java / C ++(稍后迁移到所有java)。

微软是如何花费大量的.NET来推广网络的?服务,J2EE实际上占了更大的份额?

http://www.internetnews.com/ec-news/article.php/3077221



< blockquote>在文章< HL ******** @ bath.ac.uk> ;,, Tim Tyler< ti*@tt1.org>写道

在comp.lang.java.advocacy asj< ka ******* @ yahoo.com>写道:

:微软是如何花费大量的.NET来推动网络的:服务,并且J2EE实际上占据了更大的份额,这不是很有趣吗?

在微软介入之前,Web服务是IBM的宝贝。




结果并非如此。


简单地说,XML规范在二月份成为了W3C的推荐,并且在Dave Winer发布他的有趣的

评论之后不久,下一件大事就是使用XML over HTTP的RPC。在1998年中期的
中,Winer和Don Box正在与微软谈论什么变成了什么?
SOAP,微软甚至试图向IETF提供早期版本

(几乎忽略了它)。


IBM在2000年初参与,仅仅几个月之前

微软宣布了.NET战略并且SOAP已经提交给了W3C。


微软是第一个与Web服务合作的第一个主要参与者(在现在已经被接受的RPC-或者文档样式

通过SOAP或XML-RPC进行通信。)

-

Tom Welsh


BIG news from the web services front. Amazon will use web services to
tie all its vendors together. The company implementing the system will
be using Java/C++ (migrating to all-java later).

Isn''t it funny how Microsoft spent so much touting .NET for web
services, and J2EE is actually taking a bigger slice of the pie?

http://www.internetnews.com/ec-news/article.php/3077221

解决方案

In comp.lang.java.advocacy asj <ka*******@yahoo.com> wrote:

: Isn''t it funny how Microsoft spent so much touting .NET for web
: services, and J2EE is actually taking a bigger slice of the pie?

Web services were IBM''s baby before Microsoft got involved.
--
__________
|im |yler http://timtyler.org/ ti*@tt1.org


Actually it is very funny.

MS had to make their way into an market where java had 7 years start. As we
all know, on the desktop people have used the best product for years, but on
conservative markets like servers, SUN and others had convinced people that
they NEED a big expensive server to compensate for the lack of performance
in enviromnents like Java. Proving them wrong could take a long time and be
very hard since when you get yourself into the hands of SUN you expect to be
robbed. As a step on the way, until people get to fully understand their own
good, MS made it possible for the rest of the world to make some use of the
old and expensive tech in Java by forcing SUN to abandon their non standard
way of doing things. Now people can see that exaktly the same thing in .NET
is 3 times as fast, 10 times easier to build but has a significantly lower
price.

"asj" <ka*******@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:38**************************@posting.google.c om...

BIG news from the web services front. Amazon will use web services to
tie all its vendors together. The company implementing the system will
be using Java/C++ (migrating to all-java later).

Isn''t it funny how Microsoft spent so much touting .NET for web
services, and J2EE is actually taking a bigger slice of the pie?

http://www.internetnews.com/ec-news/article.php/3077221



In article <HL********@bath.ac.uk>, Tim Tyler <ti*@tt1.org> writes

In comp.lang.java.advocacy asj <ka*******@yahoo.com> wrote:

: Isn''t it funny how Microsoft spent so much touting .NET for web
: services, and J2EE is actually taking a bigger slice of the pie?

Web services were IBM''s baby before Microsoft got involved.



That turns out not to be the case.

Briefly, the XML specification became a W3C recommendation in February
1998, and very shortly after Dave Winer published his interesting
comment that the next big thing would be RPC using XML over HTTP. In
mid-1998 Winer and Don Box were talking to Microsoft about what became
SOAP, and Microsoft even attempted to offer an early version to IETF
(which pretty much ignored it).

IBM got involved at the beginning of 2000, only a few months before
Microsoft announced the .NET strategy and SOAP was submitted to W3C.

Microsoft was emphatically the first major player to become involved
with Web services (in the now accepted sense of RPC- or document-style
communication over SOAP or XML-RPC).
--
Tom Welsh


这篇关于新闻:亚马逊使用Java / C ++进入Web服务的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆