关于混淆的法律问题。 [英] A legal question about obfuscation.

问题描述

大家好


想象一下这个场景：


- 我的公司开发了一个程序集（一个控件DLL）

- 由于混淆软件过于昂贵，我的公司聘请了一个

顾问并委托他进行组装混淆过程

- 顾问使用他（定期购买和许可）混淆

用于混淆我公司组装的软件

- 我的公司向顾问付款并收回混淆的组件

- 我的公司出售互联网上的混淆程序集（没有混淆软件的许可证）


在您看来，这是法律吗？


谢谢。


John Ti。

解决方案

> ;在您看来，这是法律吗？


意见不算数，除非你是法官。是的，这是合法的。


-

HTH，


Kevin Spencer

Microsoft MVP

专业Numbskull


努力工作是一种药物，

没有安慰剂。


" John T." <无*********** @ gmail.com>在消息中写道

新闻：eV ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl ...

大家好

想象一下这个场景：

- 我的公司开发了一个程序集（一个控件DLL）
- 由于混淆软件太贵了，我的公司聘请了一个
顾问并委托他进行大会混淆过程
- 顾问使用他的（定期购买和许可）混淆软件来模糊我公司的大会
- 我的公司付钱给顾问并收回混淆的程序集
- 我的公司在互联网上销售混淆的程序集（没有混淆软件的许可副本）

在您看来，这是法律吗？

谢谢。

John Ti。

一般来说我会说事情还可以。您最好的选择是与熟悉当地实践（即州/联邦法律）的

律师交谈。


干杯，


Greg Young

" John T." <无*********** @ gmail.com>在消息中写道

新闻：eV ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl ...

大家好

想象一下这个场景：

- 我的公司开发了一个程序集（一个控件DLL）
- 由于混淆软件太贵了，我的公司聘请了一个
顾问并委托他进行大会混淆过程
- 顾问使用他的（定期购买和许可）混淆软件来模糊我公司的大会
- 我的公司付钱给顾问并收回混淆的程序集
- 我的公司在互联网上销售混淆的程序集（没有混淆软件的许可副本）

在您看来，这是法律吗？

谢谢。

John Ti。

我知道Dotfuscator Pro，你的许可证购买适用于每个开发商，

将混淆任何东西。在这种情况下，仍然有合法的许可证为这个家伙购买了b $ b，他们正在混淆你想要的东西。如果他正在使用获得混淆的Dotfuscator的许可证，那么我会认为他在

清楚。对于其他一些混淆软件，它可能会有所不同。

-

KMG Software，Inc。

思考超越，上面和之前
http://www.kmgsoftware.com

" ; John T.写道：

大家好

想象一下这个场景：

- 我的公司开发了一个程序集（一个控件DLL） - 由于混淆软件太昂贵，我的公司聘请了一名顾问并委托他进行汇编混淆过程
- 顾问使用他的（定期购买和许可的）混淆软件来混淆我的公司的组装
- 我的公司向顾问付款并收回模糊的组件
- 我公司在互联网上销售混淆的组件（没有混淆软件的许可副本）

在您看来，这是法律吗？

谢谢。

John Ti。

Hi all

Figure this scenario:

- My Company develops an assembly (a controls DLL)
- Since an obfuscation software is too expensive, my Company engages a
consultant and delegates him the assembly obfuscation process
- The consultant uses his (regulary purchased and licensed) obfuscation
software for obfuscate my Company''s assembly
- My Company pays the consultant and receive back the obfuscated assembly
- My Company sell the obfuscated assembly on Internet (without having a
licensed copy of the obfuscation software)

In your opinion, is this LEGAL?

Thank you.

John Ti.

解决方案

> In your opinion, is this LEGAL?

Opinions don''t count, unless you''re a judge. Yes, it''s legal.

--
HTH,

Kevin Spencer
Microsoft MVP
Professional Numbskull

Hard work is a medication for which
there is no placebo.

"John T." <no***********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:eV**************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

Hi all

Figure this scenario:

- My Company develops an assembly (a controls DLL)
- Since an obfuscation software is too expensive, my Company engages a
consultant and delegates him the assembly obfuscation process
- The consultant uses his (regulary purchased and licensed) obfuscation
software for obfuscate my Company''s assembly
- My Company pays the consultant and receive back the obfuscated assembly
- My Company sell the obfuscated assembly on Internet (without having a
licensed copy of the obfuscation software)

In your opinion, is this LEGAL?

Thank you.

John Ti.

Generally I would say things are ok. Your best option is to talk with an
attorney, who is familiar with local practices (i.e. state/federal laws).

Cheers,

Greg Young
"John T." <no***********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:eV**************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

Hi all

Figure this scenario:

- My Company develops an assembly (a controls DLL)
- Since an obfuscation software is too expensive, my Company engages a
consultant and delegates him the assembly obfuscation process
- The consultant uses his (regulary purchased and licensed) obfuscation
software for obfuscate my Company''s assembly
- My Company pays the consultant and receive back the obfuscated assembly
- My Company sell the obfuscated assembly on Internet (without having a
licensed copy of the obfuscation software)

In your opinion, is this LEGAL?

Thank you.

John Ti.

I know with Dotfuscator Pro, the license you buy is for each developer that
will be obfuscating anything. In this case, there is still a license legally
purchased for this guy, who is obfuscating what you want. If he''s using a
licensed copy of Dotfuscator for his obfuscation, I would think he''s in the
clear. For some other obfuscation softwares it may be different.
--
KMG Software, Inc.
Thinking Beyond, Above, and Before
http://www.kmgsoftware.com
"John T." wrote:

Hi all

Figure this scenario:

- My Company develops an assembly (a controls DLL)
- Since an obfuscation software is too expensive, my Company engages a
consultant and delegates him the assembly obfuscation process
- The consultant uses his (regulary purchased and licensed) obfuscation
software for obfuscate my Company''s assembly
- My Company pays the consultant and receive back the obfuscated assembly
- My Company sell the obfuscated assembly on Internet (without having a
licensed copy of the obfuscation software)

In your opinion, is this LEGAL?

Thank you.

John Ti.

这篇关于关于混淆的法律问题。的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！