社区如何评价.NET 2005与.NET 2003？ [英] How does the community rate .NET 2005 vs. .NET 2003?

问题描述

2005年值得升级吗？

不久前，我读到它真的很慢。这是真的吗？

任何想法都会受到赞赏。


此外，从2003应用程序升级到2005年有多容易？它会破坏

典型的一切，MS对不起，这是你的问题风格？


谢谢，


Shane

解决方案

恕我直言 - 等待第一个服务包。


当然，这可能是在2008年，如果它优先于

VS2003，这是完全可能的，因为下一个最新&最好的

非向后兼容版本的VS / DotNet已经在开发中。


Bob Lehmann


Shane Story <无**** @ nothanks.com>在消息中写道

新闻：ue ************** @ TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl ...

2005年值得升级？
前段时间，我读到它真的很慢。这是真的吗？
任何想法都会受到赞赏。

此外，从2003应用程序升级到2005年有多容易？是否打破了典型的一切，MS对不起，这是你的问题风格？

谢谢，

Shane

我有点破对这个。有很多好的VS2005中的东西....

虽然没有一个真正惊天动地。我认为普遍缺乏

注重细节在最近的所有MS产品中。你可以在Visual Studio中看到它&b>
2005以及Office 2003.它就像他们的质量保证部门那样。
已成为一个大单元测试机器人而不是人类人类

脉冲。

前段时间，我读到它真的很慢。这是真的？
VS2005 *整体* a * bit *比V2003慢......但它比VS2003快了很多

。所以这是一个加号。但是，IDE是有缺陷的，并且有一个没有

已准备好迎接黄金时段。感受到它。 VS2003更加稳定，并且具有更加优雅的感觉。 Web表单设计器是VS中最容易被错误运行并且b / b
的功能不足的垃圾。 Visual Studio团队需要走下大厅，从FrontPage团队中偷走一些人（比如说你想要什么关于FrontPage，它的所见即所得的WYSIWIG设计师是最好的缺口）。这通常是微软x.0......他们似乎永远无法在第一时间做到这一点

左右。他们强化了自己的刻板印象。


哦，是的，F1帮助系统非常残忍且几乎无法使用。我发现

有关如何使用Google进行操作的信息比使用Visual Studio的

帮助系统和MSDN集成更多信息。


我发誓，如果他们花费大量时间推出.1。发布我

只会关于MS和他们的营销驱动开发。

足够了。我希望MS能够在这个时候获得更多。他们

是唯一一家多年来一直坐在BUGS上的公司（无论是大小的b $ b）。 @＃

我们不需要支付

数千美元/年
年

Is 2005 worth the upgrade?
Some time ago, I read it was really slow. Is this true?
Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Also, how easy is it to upgrade from 2003 app to 2005? Does it break
everything in typical, MS "Sorry, that''s your problem" style?

Thanks,

Shane

解决方案

IMHO - Wait for the first service pack.

Of course, that may be in 2008 if it''s anything like the priority placed on
VS2003, which is entirely possible since the next latest & greatest
non-backwards-compatible version of VS/DotNet is already in the works.

Bob Lehmann

"Shane Story" <no****@nothanks.com> wrote in message
news:ue**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...

Is 2005 worth the upgrade?
Some time ago, I read it was really slow. Is this true?
Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Also, how easy is it to upgrade from 2003 app to 2005? Does it break
everything in typical, MS "Sorry, that''s your problem" style?

Thanks,

Shane

I''m a bit torn about this. There are lots of "good" things in VS2005....
though none are truly earth-shattering. I think there''s a general lack of
"attention to detail" in all MS products lately. You see it in Visual Studio
2005 as well as Office 2003. It''s like their Quality Assurance department
has become one big Unit Testing robot and not human beings with a human
pulse.

Some time ago, I read it was really slow. Is this true? VS2005 is *overall* a *bit* slower than V2003.... but it starts up a lot
faster than VS2003. So that''s a plus. But, the IDE is buggy and has a "not
quite ready for prime time" feel to it. VS2003 is WAY MORE stable and has a
more polished feel to it. The Web Form designer is the most bug-ridden and
underpowered piece of trash in all of VS. The Visual Studio Team needs to go
down the hall and steal a few folks from the FrontPage team (say what you
want about FrontPage it''s WYSIWIG Designer is top notch). It is typical
Microsoft "x.0"... they just can''t seem to ever get it right the first time
around EVER. They reinforce their own stereotypes.

Oh yeah, the F1 Help System is pretty attrocious and almost unusable. I find
more info on how to do things using Google than I do using Visual Studio''s
Help System and MSDN integration.

I sweark, if they take a huge amount of time to put out a ".1" release I
will JUST ABOUT HAVE HAD IT with MS and their marketing driven development.
Enough is enough. I expect a lot more from MS at this point of time. They
are the only company that pretty much gets away with sitting on BUGS (both
big and minor) for years at a time. We don''t pay

thousands of dollars a
year for @#

这篇关于社区如何评价.NET 2005与.NET 2003？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！