K& R勘误表？ [英] K&R Errata?

问题描述

我正在寻找Kernighan错误的完整列表&

Ritchie'的The C Programming Lanuage：2nd Edition（ANSI C）

另外，使用勘误表完成列表的最佳方法是什么？我不想再一次回到勘误表，因为这可能会减慢我的学习成果但是我也不想学习一些不是'n'的东西。 't

100％准确。


Zach

解决方案

Zach写道：

我正在寻找Kernighan错误的全面列表&

Ritchie'sThe C Programming Lanuage：2nd版（ANSI C）

最好转到消息来源：


< http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm /cs/cbook/index.html>


Brian

默认用户写道：
< blockquote class =post_quotes>
Zach写道：

>我正在寻找Kernighan&
里奇的全面错误列表''C Programming Lanuage：2nd Edition（ANSI C）"

最好去消息来源：


< http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm /cs/cbook/index.html>

刚拿到我的K& R2英文版。有没有人知道上面的勘误表

是否包含有关附录A：参考资料

手册之间不一致的修复方法。和实际的最终ANSI C89 / ISO C90（或更好，C95）？


谢谢。

关于勘误表：


" 53（§2.12）：表格下的注释应该说&以及+ - *作为一元运算符具有更高的优先级。

有人可以说该表下的整个注释文本应该是什么吗？

I am looking for a comprehensive list of errors in Kernighan &
Ritchie''s "The C Programming Lanuage: 2nd Edition (ANSI C)"

Also what is the best way to work through the list with the Errata? I
don''t want to constantly refer back to the Errata since that may slow
down my learning but I also don''t want to learn something that isn''t
100% accurate.

Zach

解决方案

Zach wrote:

I am looking for a comprehensive list of errors in Kernighan &
Ritchie''s "The C Programming Lanuage: 2nd Edition (ANSI C)"

Best to go to the source:

<http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/cbook/index.html>


Brian

Default User wrote:

Zach wrote:

>I am looking for a comprehensive list of errors in Kernighan &
Ritchie''s "The C Programming Lanuage: 2nd Edition (ANSI C)"

Best to go to the source:

<http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/cbook/index.html>

Just got my English copy of K&R2. Does anyone know if the above errata
contain fixes regarding inconsistencies between "Appendix A: Reference
manual" and the actual final ANSI C89/ISO C90 (or better, C95)?

Thanks.

About the errata:

"53(§2.12): The note under the table should say & as well as + - * has
higher precedence as a unary operator."
Can someone say what the entire note text under that table should be?

这篇关于K&amp; R勘误表？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！