可访问性文章 [英] Accesibility article

问题描述

我正在上一堂关于网络创作和HTML的课程。我正在努力寻找一篇关于可访问性问题的好读篇文章。我正在努力保持

阅读补充相对较轻的阅读，所以我不想

只是将我的学生指向W3C的网站Accessibilty Guidline文章

（有点重读）。你们中的任何人都可以推荐一个在线文章

，这将解释为什么你需要考虑可访问性和

关于如何实现它的一些基本想法？

I''m teaching a class on web authoring and html. I''m trying to find a
good reading article on accesibility issues. I''m trying to keep the
reading supplements to relatively light reading, so I don''t want to
just point my students to the W3C''s Web Accessibilty Guidline articles
(a little to heavy reading). Can any of you suggest an online article
out there that will explain why you need to think about accesbility and
some basic ideas on how to achieve it?

推荐答案

我在网站提示网站上讨论了一些相关问题：
http://webtips.dan.info/

-

Dan

I discuss some related issues in my Web Tips site:
http://webtips.dan.info/

--
Dan

2004年12月13日星期一，Monte Gardner写道：

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Monte Gardner wrote:

我正在上课网页制作和HTML。我正在努力寻找一篇关于可访问性问题的好阅读文章。我正在努力保持阅读补充相对较轻的阅读，


亲爱的。你问什么似乎是一个看似合理的问题，但

那里没有简单的答案。好吧，我会说 - 这是一个简单的答案 -

，当你知道它是，并且接受它。但是，学习HTML的大多数人都将会产生一种先入为主的压抑因素，即阻止他们接受它。不学习先入为主

，根据经验，/远远比学习全新的东西更难。


这里有很多贡献者，你可以学习来自，但是

你需要按照讨论而不是弹出并询问

一个看似简单的问题...


至于我自己的无能为力的贡献，我最后整理了一些文件

晚上偶然发现半年半的书面批评

我找到了一个所谓的高级课程指南网上课程

页面设计。[1]


基于它的帖子，由goo-gropes存档
http： //groups.google.co.uk/groups?se...6.ph.gla.ac.uk


- 这可能至少有助于定位移动。


[1]在学术界，人们经常注意到标题中带有高级

的书籍充其量只是目标在中学一级，而一些是b $ b与基本水平在标题中可能需要大学学位，

甚至可能是博士学位，甚至能够理解它们，更不用说从他们那里学到任何东西了。

所以我不想只是将我的学生指向W3C的Web Accessibilty Guidline文章


这完全可以理解。他们倾向于在他们感兴趣的细枝中获得

，并且忽视了大的b / b
图片。

在那里，这将解释为什么你需要考虑可访问性
和一些基本的想法如何实现它？

I''m teaching a class on web authoring and html. I''m trying to find a
good reading article on accesibility issues. I''m trying to keep the
reading supplements to relatively light reading,
Oh dear. You ask what appears to be a plausible enough question, but
there''s no simple answer. Well, I''d say there -is- a simple answer -
when you know that it is, and are receptive to it. But most of the
folks learning HTML will come to it with a ballast of preconceptions
that prevent them being receptive to it. Un-learning preconceptions
is, by experience, /far/ harder than learning completely new stuff.

There are quite a few contributors here whom you could learn from, but
you''d need to follow the discussions rather than popping up and asking
an apparently simple question...

As for my own inept contributions, I was tidying-up some files last
night and stumbled across a half-year-old half-written critique of a
course guide that I found for a supposedly "advanced" course in web
page design.[1]

There''s a posting based on it, archived by goo-gropes at
http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?se...6.ph.gla.ac.uk

- which might be helpful at least as a positioning move.

[1] In the academic world it''s often noted that books with "advanced"
in the title are at best aimed at secondary school level, whereas ones
with "elementary" in the title probably need a university degree,
maybe even a PhD, to even be able to understand them, let alone to
learn anything from them.
so I don''t want to
just point my students to the W3C''s Web Accessibilty Guidline articles
That''s entirely understandable. There''s a tendency for them to get
bound up in the minutiae of their interests, and lose sight of the big
picture.
out there that will explain why you need to think about accesbility
and some basic ideas on how to achieve it?

我的基本和我的想法是回到逻辑结构的概念上（即使考虑到HTML在这方面不太理想的事实......）但是它是我们可以访问的最好的东西，实际上是

，所以我们使用它，疣和所有。）


那里真正的WWW - 将从结构中分离出来，没有

无论你是否赞成它，无论那些宝贵的设计师坚持他们的艺术是没有价值，如果他们

不能强加两者，完全按照他们设想的条款。


所以要了解这种脱钩涉及的内容 - 利用它，利用它，

充分利用媒体的优势将

内容传达给最广泛的用户和浏览情境。不要 - 像这些像素珍贵的图形设计师坚持做的那样 - b $ b - 让自己受到它的弱点的支配。


祝你好运

My "basic" idea is to go right back to the concept of logical
structure (even allowing for the fact that HTML is less than ideal
in that regard - but it''s the best thing that we have access to, in
practical terms, so we use it, "warts and all").

The real WWW out there -will- decouple presentation from structure, no
matter whether you''re in favour of it or not, and no matter those
precious designers who insist that their art is worthless if they
cannot impose both, in exactly the terms that they have conceived.

So learn what this decoupling involves - capitalise on it, exploit it,
make best use of the strengths of the medium to communicate the
content to the widest range of users and browsing situations. Don''t -
as those pixel-precious graphic designers insist on doing - put
yourself at the mercy of its weaknesses.

good luck

2004年12月13日12:25:22 -0800，Monte Gardner < Mo *********** @ asu.edu>

写道：

On 13 Dec 2004 12:25:22 -0800, "Monte Gardner" <Mo***********@asu.edu>
wrote:

我正在网上教课创作和HTML。我正在努力寻找一篇关于可访问性问题的好阅读文章。

I''m teaching a class on web authoring and html. I''m trying to find a
good reading article on accesibility issues.

[...]


< http://diveintoaccessibility.org/>


尼克


-

Nick Theodorakis ni ************** @ hotmail.com

联系表格：
http：// theodorakis .net / contact.html

[...]

<http://diveintoaccessibility.org/>

Nick

--
Nick Theodorakis
ni**************@hotmail.com
contact form:
http://theodorakis.net/contact.html

这篇关于可访问性文章的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！