Rhomobile的与PhoneGap的注意事项 [英] Rhomobile vs. Phonegap considerations

问题描述

我的PhoneGap和Rhomobile的辩论之间跨平台移动应用开发。我是一个web开发与红宝石的经验，以及传统的Web技术（HTML，CSS和JavaScript）。本申请的后端将通过网络浏览器进行访问，并内置有导轨。这些平台之间进行选择时什么是我的首要顾虑？其中你会建议我去？为什么？

I'm debating between Phonegap and RhoMobile for cross platform mobile application development. I'm a web developer with experience in Ruby as well as the traditional web technologies (HTML, CSS, and Javascript). The backend of this application will be accessed via a web browser and built with Rails. What are my chief concerns when choosing between these platforms? Which would you recommend I go with and WHY?

感谢您

推荐答案

我只想补充一点，这些是罗得岛的主要差别与PhoneGap的（或钛）：

I will just add that these are the major differentiators of Rhodes versus PhoneGap (or Titanium):

• 在罗德是一个MVC（模型视图控制器的）模式
支持的唯一框架
• 在罗德与同步和对象关系管理的唯一框架，因此非常适合数据密集型应用
• 在罗德是一个应用程序生成的唯一框架
• 在罗兹更广泛的操作系统支持（其中唯一一个支持Windows Mobile的的）
• 在罗德支持更多的设备功能。这是近场通信支持的唯一框架，实时的基于硬件的吧code扫描和签名采集
• 在罗兹真正的全IDE与一个集成的调试器，以及独立于设备的模拟器（ PhoneGap的东西不的）

• Rhodes is the only framework with support for a MVC (Model View Controller) pattern
• Rhodes is the only framework with both synchronization and an Object Relational Manager, making it ideal for data intensive applications
• Rhodes is the only framework with an app generator
• Rhodes has broader OS support (including the only one with support for Windows Mobile)
• Rhodes supports more device capabilities. It is the only framework with Near Field Communications support, realtime hardware-based barcode scanning and signature capture
• Rhodes has true full IDE with an integrated debugger and a device independent simulator (something PhoneGap does not)

如果你去谷歌组，我想你会看到一些bug报告那里。但阅读的内容和执行RhoStudio教程（这应该不到一个小时投资）后作出自己的判断。同时回归测试在所有罗德签入连续执行。

If you go to the google group, I think you will see that few bugs are reported there. But make your own judgement after reading the content and executing the RhoStudio tutorial (which should take less than an hour of investment). Also regression testing is executed continuously on all Rhodes checkins.

如果您通过创建具有HTML的本机应用程序，并提出一些设备拨打电话的能力，判断框架，PhoneGap的和罗德都pretty的大致相同。而且都有一些问题与缺陷，因为这种低杆是相当简单的。

If you judge the framework by the ability to create a native app with HTML and make some device calls, PhoneGap and Rhodes are both pretty much the same. And both have few issues with bugs, as this low bar is fairly simple.

以上（这是我总结为现代发展技术信息密集型应用）中列出的微分具有内在的复杂性给他们。随着社会的帮助下，从我们的新东家摩托罗拉大型专用QA人员，这些差异化功能都已经相当成熟了，也不要在其他产品的存在。

The differentiators listed above (which I summary as "modern development techniques for information intensive apps") have an inherent complexity to them. With the help of the community and a large dedicated QA staff from our new owner Motorola, these differentiator features are all now quite mature, and do not exist in other products.

这篇关于Rhomobile的与PhoneGap的注意事项的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！