Azure SQL数据库 - 自动故障转移组 [英] Azure SQL Database - auto-failover groups
问题描述
根据 使用自动故障转移组启用多个数据库的透明和协调故障转移 ：
如果添加已具有辅助数据库的数据库在辅助服务器中的数据库，该组继承该地理复制链接。当您在不属于故障转移组的服务器中添加已具有辅助数据库的数据库时，将在辅助服务器中创建
a new secondary。
第一句话使意味着继承链接的地方。在我的测试中，我发现第二句不正确。如果我有地理复制的数据库部分，并且我添加了故障转移组的相同数据库成员，则新的辅助数据库是在辅助服务器中创建的
NOT 。
文档是否有误？
Hi Taiob，
感谢您指出这个问题。解决此问题的最佳方法是更新内容。在每个Azure-Docs或Azure GitHub repo托管文档的底部是反馈部分。使用此通信渠道对文档中的增强功能和错误进行直接反馈
。
当您单击"此页面"按钮或"GitHub"链接时（从下拉菜单中，您可以详细说明您已识别的问题，或者您可能对反馈提供的反馈。当您创建问题时，它会列在以前使用特定文档标识的
打开或关闭的项目列表中。这些在尝试研究问题时也很有用。
As per Use auto-failover groups to enable transparent and coordinated failover of multiple databases :
If you add a database that already has a secondary database in the secondary server, that geo-replication link is inherited by the group. When you add a database that already has a secondary database in a server that is not part of the failover group, a new secondary is created in the secondary server.
First sentence make sense where it is mentioned about inheriting the link. In my test I find second sentence incorrect. If I have a database part of geo-replication and I add the same database member of a failover group a new secondary database is NOT created in the secondary server.
Is the documentation wrong?
Hi Taiob,
Thank you for pointing out this issue. The best means for addressing this is to get the content updated. At the bottom of every Azure-Docs or Azure GitHub repo hosted document is a Feedback section. Use this communication channel to make direct feedback with regard to enhancements and bugs in the document.
When you click on the `This page` button or the `GitHub` link (from the drop-down menu) you are presented with the ability to detail the issue you have identified or with feedback you may have with the feedback. When you create an issue it is listed in the Open or Closed list of items previously identified with the specific document. These also become useful when trying to researching an issue.
这篇关于Azure SQL数据库 - 自动故障转移组的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
