是否可以将DirectX 7 DirectPlay文件与为Windows制作的游戏捆绑在一起？ [英] Is it ok to bundle DirectX 7 DirectPlay files with games made for windows?

问题描述

我想在www.blitzbasic.com上使用Blitz3D制作一些游戏和应用程序，并想知道将DirectPlay DLL文件与游戏和应用程序捆绑在一起是否合法。

I want to make some games and apps with Blitz3D from www.blitzbasic.com and wondered if it was legally ok to bundle the DirectPlay DLL files with the games and apps.

原因是停止在某些民族机器上弹出的Windows 10上的"安装DirectPlay"请求者。

The reason is to stop the 'Install DirectPlay' requester on windows 10 which has popped up on some peoples machine.

推荐答案

传统的DirectX SDK EULA允许您使用DirectSetup REDIST但不能复制单个文件。如
中所述
本文，从Windows XP SP2开始，您认为所有内容都是"DirectX"。是操作系统的一部分，DirectSetup不包括DirectPlay。由于我不是律师，因此无法向您提供法律建议，但您应该查看DirectX SDK EULA。
请参阅 Documentation \License Agreements \DirectX SDK EULA.txt 和 directx redist.txt 。

The legacy DirectX SDK EULA allows you to use the DirectSetup REDIST but not to copy individual files. As noted in this article, as of Windows XP SP2 everything you think of as "DirectX" is part of the OS and is not installed by DirectSetup including DirectPlay. I can't give you legal advice as I'm not a lawyer, but you should review the DirectX SDK EULA. See Documentation\License Agreements\DirectX SDK EULA.txt and directx redist.txt.

DirectPlay is考虑遗留问题的原因有很多，包括对网络安全的担忧。 DirectPlay的主要价值在于，当多人游戏的传输协议很复杂时，它提供了抽象（NetBIOS，IP / SPX，调制解调器
头对头，串行，调制解调器上的TCP / IP，TCP / IP） ）。它仅支持Windows 10（通过Windows可选功能）用于旧版游戏的BackCompat。

DirectPlay is considered legacy for a number of reasons including concerns about network security. The primary value of DirectPlay was that it provided an abstraction back when the transport protocol for multiplayer games was complex (NetBIOS, IP/SPX, Modem head-to-head, serial, TCP/IP over Modem, TCP/IP). It's only supported on Windows 10 (via a Windows optional feature) for BackCompat with older games.

这篇关于是否可以将DirectX 7 DirectPlay文件与为Windows制作的游戏捆绑在一起？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！