哈德逊vs詹金斯(2012) [英] Hudson vs Jenkins in 2012

查看:87
本文介绍了哈德逊vs詹金斯(2012)的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

在2011年,哈德森(Hudson)和詹金斯(Jenkins)的情况紧随其后(IMHO)-哈德森(Hedson)有点稳定,但詹金斯(Jenkins)的发展要快一些.
2012年的哈德逊vs詹金斯"现在情况如何?

In 2011 situation with Hudson and Jenkins was following(IMHO) - Hudson was a little bit stable, but development of Jenkins was a little bit faster.
What is the situation with "Hudson vs Jenkins" now in 2012?

推荐答案

在稳定性方面,詹金斯(Jenkins)提供了超过一年的

In terms of stability, for over a year Jenkins has offered a Long-Term Support (LTS) version for people who want to be more assured about the stability and support of the software they're installing.

每三个月左右,就会选择一个先前的发行版,Jenkins用户社区认为该发行版运行良好.然后分支该版本,将所有重要的修复程序(经过战斗测试")回移植到Jenkins版本中,然后此发行版将受到各种人员和公司的额外测试.一旦准备好发布,它将成为新的LTS版本.

Every three months or so, a previous release is selected which has been deemed as working well by the community of Jenkins users. This version is then branched, any important fixes (which have been "battle-tested") are backported into this Jenkins version, and then this release gets extra testing by various people and companies. Once it's ready for release, this becomes the new LTS version.

随着新的高优先级修补程序的出现,这些修补程序将反向移植到LTS版本.

As new high-priority fixes come along, these are backported to the LTS version.

众多 Jenkins的大用户坚持使用LTS系列,并根据公众 Jenkins使用情况统计信息,有数千个部署使用它.

Numerous large users of Jenkins stick to the LTS line of releases, and according to the public Jenkins usage statistics, several thousand deployments are using it.

这应该意味着您要下载的LTS版本比从通常的每周发布行中选择的随机版本更加稳定.

This should mean the LTS version you are downloading is even more stable than a random version chosen from the usual weekly release line.

除统计数据外,与Hudson相比,有关Jenkins使用情况,社区规模,其发展水平,新功能添加率,新插件数量和邮件列表活动的情况似乎没有变化(即Jenkins仍然存在) 继续向前).

Beyond the statistics, the situation regarding Jenkins usage, community size, its level of development, rate of new features added, number of new plugins and mailing list activity in comparison to Hudson doesn't seem to have changed (i.e. Jenkins remains ever-further ahead).

基本上,此先前的讨论中提出的大多数观点仍然适用,尽管哈德森最初的公司支持似乎有点消退了.

Basically, most of the points made in this previous discussion still apply, though the initial corporate support of Hudson appears to have subsided a little.

这篇关于哈德逊vs詹金斯(2012)的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆