CI：哈德逊与.net VS CruiseControl.Net [英] CI: Hudson with .Net vs CruiseControl.Net
问题描述
我的.NET店希望整合CI服务器的工作。从我所看到的，赫德森似乎是最流行的选择。考虑到我们是一个.NET只有店，将哈德森present任何障碍的CC.NET不会？
I work for a .net shop looking to integrate a CI server. From what I've seen, Hudson seems to be the most popular choice. Considering we are a .net only shop, will Hudson present any hurdles that CC.NET will not?
推荐答案
我不能想到一个单一的东西哈德森处理不当的能够做我们的C＃开发，即使MSTest的基础测试，你现在可以运行和趋势图形上他们与新的插件或my方法它适用于多个组件。
I cant think of a single thing that Hudson hasnt been able to do for our C# development, even with MSTest based tests, you can now run and trendgraph on them with the new plugin (only works if you are testing ONE assembly) or my method which works on multiple assemblies.
我想这将是很好的唯一的事情，将产生code覆盖数据和报告的，不知道CC.net做到这一点。
I suppose the only thing that would be nice, would be to generate code coverage data and report on that, not sure if CC.net does that.
此外，哈德森似乎有更强大的社区支持。我从来没有听说过有人捡CC.net了哈德森，如果他们当初的选择。
Also, Hudson seems to have much stronger community support. I've never heard of someone picking CC.net over Hudson if they had the choice.
我们用它来
- 在部署Windows服务
- 在部署Web服务
- 运行MSTests和放大器;任何JUnit测试显示尽可能多的信息
- 在跟踪低，中，高的任务 的
- 趋势图形警告和错误
这些东西可能不是什么新的哈德森，但我觉得有必要重新强调，哈德森可以处理这一个.NET项目，没问题。
These things may not be anything new to Hudson, but I felt the need to re emphasize that Hudson can handle this with a .net project, no problem.
下面是一些建于.NET的东西，哈德森支持
Here are some of the built in .net stuff that Hudson supports
- MSBuild
- NAnt
- MSTest (two methods, linked above)
- Nunit
- Team Foundation Server
- fxcop
- stylecop
- compiler warnings
- code tasks
此外，上帝保佑你正在使用Visual源安全，它支持以及。我建议你看看 Redsolo的构建.NET项目文章使用哈德森
Also, god forbid you are using visual source safe, it supports that as well. I'd recommend you take a look at Redsolo's article on building .net projects using Hudson
这篇关于CI：哈德逊与.net VS CruiseControl.Net的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
